Nov 04

Straight to the heart of it

Rush really does seem to get the Trump Rebellions.

TRUMP: Our country has no spirit. Our country has no gravitas. Our country doesn’t feel good about itself. And the primary reason is we have no victories. As an example, this horrible deal that we signed with Iran where we’re giving $150 billion and we lose everything. We lose everything. It’s a laughingstock of a deal. We have no victories. We need some pomp and circumstance. We need spirit. We need a cheerleader. I thought… Seven years ago when Obama got elected the one thing I thought that he would be a great cheerleader for the country; he’s not. He’s been a great divider for the country. He’s been one of the great dividers of all time.

RUSH: You think that doesn’t resonate with people that hear that? Every word of that has people — if not for real, euphemistically — standing up and cheering. We don’t have any victories. Look, we just had the World Series. The Kansas City Royals just won the World Series for the first time in 30 years, and only the second time. Big parade in Kansas City today. You know what it means. Whenever you’re part of a team — and a lot of people never get to experience this. Most people will never know what it feels like. 

They can only imagine. To be on a championship team — be it the Super Bowl, be it the World Series, be it the Stanley Cup, be it something in college or even high school — it’s so rare. But, boy, if you’re a fan of that team, you feel like you’re on it just the same, and you get just as big a thrill, maybe bigger than some of the players get. But it is a high. It is almost euphoric, this winning. And he’s right!  We’re not winning anything. We’re taking it on the chin no matter where you look. We’re taking it on the chin on our own border.
 
We’re taking it on the chin against terrorism. We are losing our culture. We are losing institution after institution that made and defined this country’s greatness. All of these things are under constant attack. It’s not that they’re rotting away or withering away. We are losing contests for them! There are people inside and outside this country who detest America, who detest American culture, who detest the founding, and they are hell-bent to change it and reform if and transform it — and they’re winning! And people opposed to that having no to cheer for.

The Republican Party hasn’t given ’em anything to cheer for. The Republican Party has misled them and lied to them and fooled them. There is no apparent opposition to any of this. And here comes Trump. And not even some of the Republican presidential candidates will stand up to what’s happening. The farthest they’ll go is to admit, “There’s problems and we need to fix them and I’m the guy that can do it and I can make it better.” But nobody besides Trump is actually identifying them.

Well, Ted Cruz. Ted Cruz is. More and more, people starting to think the dark horse out there that everybody actually does need to keep their eye on, because Ted Cruz would implement everything Donald Trump is talking about here, to one degree or another. But the facts that he’s right that we don’t have any winners. We’re not cheering anything. We’re being made to feel guilty for America, we’re being made to apologize for America, and it’s coming from the top. It is Obama who is leading the decline and seemingly happily.

It is Obama who says that he’s the guy to manage it. The Democrat Party is telling everybody, “This is a new reality here. This is the new normal, and you the better get used to it. The old days of American prominence? Those were artificial. We didn’t deserve those days! Those were phony. We didn’t really have that kind of prosperity. It was an illusion because we’d stolen all this from everybody around the world, and now the rest of the world wants back what we’ve stolen and by God, we’re gonna give it to ’em!

When you look at the Democrat Party and the whole Republican political establishment bending over backwards not to anger the illegals — to cater to, to pander to the illegals. Meanwhile, the illegals are not the ones that get to say what happens in this country; citizens are! But the citizens are being ignored.  It’s worse than that. The citizens are not being ignored per se; the citizens are being purposely told to shut up, that we don’t know what we’re talking about, and that we are the reason this is all happening, because we have participated in all these behaviors that equaled American guilt.

So when Trump stands up and says, “Our country has no spirit,” he’s exactly right. 

He certainly is. And liberals, both in the Democrat Socialist Party and the GOP, hate him for it.

FacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Nov 04

Bitch slap

Get bent, Social Justice Warriors.

I feel as if I’m taking the “wrong” side here, but someone has to say it – I don’t have to be taught to not be a rapist. That much comes naturally to me, as I am sure it does to the overwhelming majority of people you and I know. Brand me a bigot, a misogynist, a rape apologist, I don’t care. I stand by that.

I’m not denying there have been tragic cases of rape and abuse on campuses in the past, but do you really think the kind of people who lacks empathy, respect and human decency to the point where they’d violate someone’s body is really going to turn up to a consent lesson on a university campus? They won’t. The only people who’ll turn up will be people who (surprise, surprise) already know when it’s okay to shag someone. No new information will be taught or learned. It will just be an echo chamber of people pointing out the obvious and others nodding along, thinking the whole time thinking that they’ve saved the world.

Self-appointed teachers of consent: get off your fucking high horse. I don’t need your help to understand basic human interaction. Secondly, go and do something. Real people need your help and they deserve better than you. Next time you consider inviting me or anyone else to another bullshit event like this, have a little respect for the intelligence and decency of your peers. You might find that’s a more effective solution than accusing them of being vile rapists-in-waiting who can only be taught otherwise by a smug, righteous, self-congratulatory intervention.

Gee, wonder why the famous “not all Muslims” formulation when it comes to terrorist attacks committed by Muslims in the name of Islam is one the SJWs absolutely reject when it comes to men and rape?

Nov 04

Malignant jug-eared narcissistic has panties in a wad

Okay, to hell with fair use, I’m just going to “excerpt” the whole damned thing. It’s just that good, a surgical strike on pResident Pissypants that manages to eviscerate His Awesomeness cleanly, no fuss, no muss.

Video: Man who can handle CNBC but not Putin wonders how Republicans will handle Putin if they can’t handle CNBC

Never before did I think Obama really might believe he’s had the upper hand on Russia lately but I don’t know how else to interpret this soundbite. It was Putin who came to Obama’s “rescue” two years ago with a plan to disarm Assad after O had boxed himself in on his “red line” threats to bomb Syria over WMD use. It was Putin who invaded Crimea and is now threatening the Baltic states knowing that NATO and its backbone force of American troops are a shadow of what it once was. It was Putin who answered Obama’s calls for new leadership in Syria by doubling down with military support for Assad, forcing the U.S. to back off its demands for immediate regime change. Putin is kicking sand in his face and any commander-in-chief even vaguely in touch with reality would be loath to acknowledge it knowing how that would make him appear. Either this guy has lost touch now that he’s slipped into de facto retirement and honestly thinks he’s “handling Putin” or he figured he could get away with this knowing that a friendly crowd would guffaw even at a perfectly apt Republican criticism just because that’s what partisans do.

But that’s only half the weirdness. The other half is the fact that Obama himself has whined plenty of times about unfriendly media, most notably Fox News. He joined Hillary and the rest of the Democratic primary field in 2007 by boycotting a debate hosted by Fox because the left demanded it. Two years later, as president, the administration tried to muscle Fox out of a series of interviews with “pay czar” Ken Feinberg even though all members of the White House press pool were otherwise invited to participate. Only when the other networks threatened to boycott the interviews too did Team O relent. Anyone who watched that CNBC trainwreck and has watched debates hosted by Fox knows that Bret Baier and Chris Wallace would have been more respectful of Democratic candidates than John Harwood and Becky Quick were of the Republicans. Obama’s house is awfully glassy for him to be throwing this particular stone. In fact, I’m not sure what he means when he says the GOP couldn’t handle CNBC. They couldn’t? Nearly everyone on stage challenged the moderators over the course of the night. If they had meekly played along and then complained about the debate afterward, that would have been grounds for claiming that Republicans had buckled before a hostile adversary. But they didn’t.

What you’re really seeing here, I think, is Princess’s ego showing. The charge that Putin is kicking sand in his face stings because it’s obviously true, and he didn’t pause in his annoyance before hitting back to consider whether maybe he wasn’t a gigantic hypocrite in doing so. Simple as that.

Every word of it is true, the only quibble I have being the supposition that pausing to take any prospective hypocrisy into consideration would have altered his reaction one iota. Obama is a punk–Putin’s bitch, a gutless pussy who only displays any backbone at all when dealing with his domestic enemies…and even then, hides behind his demented disciples’ shrieks of “RACIST!!” to slink around and do his dirty work like the cringing coward he really is. Sure, he’s got brass, insolence, and gall, but those things aren’t any more synonymous with courage than cunning and guile are with intelligence.

Nov 04

INCREDIBLE: Liberal learns humility, humanity!

Man bites hell out of dog.

Critics say that his moral certainty is one of Singer’s most significant flaws—that he is too demanding, too impersonal, and too dismissive of the way people actually relate to one another. In its rawest form, Singer’s philosophy condemns people for caring more about their families than about strangers. “People do have special relationships with their families, their communities, and their countries,” Alan Ryan, the warden of New College, Oxford, told me. Ryan has written extensively on John Stuart Mill and he taught for many years at Princeton. “This is the standard equipment of humanity, and most people, in all of human history, have seen nothing wrong with it…[H]uman beings just aren’t put together the way that [Singer] wishes they were.”

“Peter is a perfectly sincere man,” McDonald told me. “But he thinks real life is not as important as intellectual life. So he can be very compelling when he talks about the intelligence and the feelings of a pig. But he is somehow not as quick to understand what our problems and possibilities might be. He has all these big ideas, but he has never really gotten his hands dirty. Peter needs to get a little more involved in life if he wants to understand it.”

About as perfect a description of liberal-fascism and its acolytes as you’re ever going to find. But here’s the truly delicious part, where ivory-tower-eggheadism meets cold, hard reality, and blows completely apart:

When Singer’s mother became too ill to live alone, Singer and his sister hired a team of home health-care aides to look after her. Singer’s mother has lost her ability to reason, to be a person, as he defines the term. So I asked him how a man who has written that we ought to do what is morally right without regard to proximity or family relationships could possibly spend tens of thousands of dollars a year for private care for his mother. He replied that it was “probably not the best use you could make of my money. That is true. But it does provide employment for a number of people who find something worthwhile in what they’re doing.”

…Singer has responded to his mother’s illness in the way most caring people would. The irony is that his humane actions clash so profoundly with the chords of his utilitarian ethic.

That doesn’t surprise Bernard Williams. “You can’t make these calculations and comparisons in real life. It’s bluff.” Williams told me, “One of the reasons his approach is so popular is that it reduces all moral puzzlement to a formula. You remove puzzlement and doubt and conflict of values, and it’s in the scientific spirit. People seem to think it will all add up, but it never does, because humans never do.”

Singer may be learning that. We were sitting in his living room one day, and the trolley traffic was noisy on the street outside his window. Singer has spent his career trying to lay down rules for human behavior which are divorced from emotion and intuition. His is a world that makes no provision for private aides to look after addled, dying old women. Yet he can’t help himself. “I think this has made me see how the issues of someone with these kinds of problems are really very difficult,” he said quietly. “Perhaps it is more difficult than I thought before, because it is different when it’s your mother.”

Neo-neocon adds, simply: “Duh.” Which is a perfect response to those perfect “liberals” when reality finally catches up to them and gives them a good, hard wedgie–as it always will, and must. Always remember, too: their rules apply only to you and me, never to them. Because they’re just so darned exceptional, see, and the rest of us would be hopelessly lost without them to guide us, mold us, shape us, and improve us.

(Via Ed)

Nov 03

All you’ll ever need to know about gun control

And gun grabbers, in one convenient illustration. Also, this.

Nov 03

Moslem reformation?

Or: Can there be a decent Islam?

And it’s fair to remember that the bloodshed of Christendom’s Thirty Years War was equally nightmarish to what’s going on now in the Middle East and that that scorched-earth conflict did, in fact, mark the turning point of the Reformation. As Catholics and Protestants fought it out in the loosely joined principalities of the Holy Roman Empire, the Great Powers of Europe rushed in to stake their claims and spread their influence. The result was a fight that lasted from 1618 to 1648 and laid most of the empire waste. When it was over, the survivors signed on to the so-called “Peace of Westphalia,” a series of treaties that recognized the sovereignty of nation states and the rights of those states to practice what religion they would like, with freedom for minority believers to practice their faiths in private. These tenets were the foundation of the modern political world.

Is that what’s unfolding in the Middle East?

The current chaos in the Levant did not just happen. It has its internal causes but no small amount of the horror can be laid at the door of Barack Obama too. From his re-establishment of relations with the tyrant Bashar Hafez al-Assad to his surrender of George W. Bush’s victory in Iraq, to his standing by with his thumb up his brain while peaceful protestors took to the Syrian streets and the country then descended into civil war, to his weak sauce bombing campaign, Putin stealing his lunch at the UN and Obama’s puny U.S. response — through it all, President Right-Side-of-History has been on the wrong side of every decision. And so yes, now, the current mess looks remarkably like the Thirty Years War with its religious underpinnings, warring states and over-involved mega powers. And so it does indeed raise the question of whether it will be the turning point in Islam’s reformation, leading to an enlightened Westphalia-style peace.

One can hope. But the tenets of Westphalia grew out of Christian thinking and Christian religion. Christians were appalled by the bloodletting of the the Thirty Years War precisely because it violated the central preachings of the Prince of Peace: Love your enemies; bless them that curse you; do good to them that hate you. The outline for modern statehood and separation of church and state were written into the Gospels: Judge not lest ye be judged; render under Caesar that which is Caesar and unto God that which is God’s, and so on.

Does the same hope lie in the tenets of Islam?

To ask the question is to answer it, for anyone who’s ever read any of the Moslems’ Little Murder Books or knows any of their history at all. Read all of it; I’d dearly love to include Klavan’s last line, but fair use disallows it.

Nov 03

Trump derangement syndrome in full flower

Okay, it’s becoming just sad now.

Rubio and Cruz atop the GOP
And Republicans could do a lot worse.

‘Ted Cruz is only going to be popular,” a lefty correspondent sniffs, “in those places where the Osmonds are still popular.” If that is true, then the news for Senator Cruz could not possibly be better, inasmuch as this puts Nevada into play: Donny and Marie signed up for a six-week stint in Las Vegas back in 2008, and extended, and extended, and will be performing in the showroom now named for them until the end of 2016, at least. Good tickets for the reliably sold-out show are $260 each — no laughing matter when one considers that the Osmond demographic includes some pretty large families. It can be hard to see it from Williamsburg or Petworth, but the culture isn’t (only) what the hipsters think it is. If Senator Cruz proves as popular as Shania Twain and NASCAR, he won’t just be president — he’ll be president-for-life.

And that is of some interest, given that Wednesday’s debate very much left the impression that this is a Ted Cruz–Marco Rubio race.

About those other guys…

Yeah, about them. Including most especially the one who still–STILL–leads Rubio and the other deeply-buried also rans by a mile in just about every poll and poll aggregate, and the only other guy who could honestly be said to be in the running with him, both of which you try to wave away with a bit of pedantic harrumph-harrumphing and a lot of blithe self-delusion.

Remember a couple of weeks ago when I suggested that the next step for the GOPe no-hopers and Trump-haters was to start pretending that he wasn’t even there, and to start talking about their preferred business-as-usual crawly things as if they were actually winning instead of being perennially stuck in sixth or seventh place, rolling about in the muck fighting over their measly four to six percent?

Yeah. That. Not that I’m saying I consider Cruz to be one of those crawly things, mind. But still.

Update! Next up from the GOPe: it’s Dewey MITT BY A LANDSLIDE! No, really, you guys! Guys…?

Nov 03

Making it explicit

Deep down, we already knew it anyway.

President Obama announced on a trip to Newark today that he’d be using his executive powers to make it easier for the federal government to hire people with criminal records.
Obama called it action to “ban the box for the most competitive jobs at federal agencies.”

“Now, the federal government is a big employer, as you know, and like a lot of big employers, on many job applications there’s a box that asks if you have a criminal record. If you answer yes, then a lot of times you’re not getting a call back,” he said.

“We’re going to do our part in changing this. The federal government, I believe, should not use criminal history to screen out applicants before we even look at their qualifications. We can’t dismiss people out of hand simply because of a mistake that they made in the past.”

Bill quips:

This makes perfect sense, once you understand that the federal bureaucracies are, themselves, vast criminal enterprises.  Al Capone did not look for new hires among Methodist church choirs.

True enough, but there’s more to it than just that. I’ve long seen government, federal especially, as a basic con game: a jobs-n-welfare program for people too stupid, lazy, or incompetent to hold real, productive jobs in any kind of free market economy.

That’s based on years as a truck driver making deliveries to government offices; once you’ve seen bureaucrats in their natural environments–running around all tense and tight-assed with pursed-lip frowns as they nervously contemplated how many rules I might have been breaking by even being there at all, spending hours trying to find the one person in the joint who was fully legally authorized to sign for some piece of trivial junk mail or other when they could have just done it themselves without repercussion or retribution; as hidebound, sorry, and shiftless a lot as you could possibly dream up in a lifetime of assuming the worst about your fellow man–and accomplishing exactly not jack shit for all that hand-flapping wasted effort, you know it for what it is.

And yeah, it’s criminal for sure. Might as well throw a few bona fide, for-real ex-cons into the mix too, right?

Nov 03

Radicalized losers

I think this problem is far more pervasive than just the occasional school shooter.

What drives a young man to pick up a gun and target the innocent, and how does he see himself in that moment of horror? Is he crazy, just lashing out — or does he see himself as a hero, deprived of acceptance by those around him, and finally able to give his life meaning by becoming a gruesome sort of martyr?

“Western societies are producing more and more of these Lost Boys, the fail-to-launch young men who carry weighty social grudges,” wrote The Federalist’s Tom Nichols, a professor of national security affairs at the U.S. Naval War College, and an adjunct professor in the Harvard Extension School. Nichols marveled at “the combination of immaturity and grandiosity among these young males.”

Immaturity and grandiosity — could two other words better describe a certain cultural image of the unrestrained American male? Seth Rogen, in all his clumsy glory, may seem like a couch potato, but he has a sweet side and maybe a trick up his sleeve. While films often make a point to show women as impressive and put together, men do not see the same treatment.

For many of these frustrated young men, violent or eye-catching acts are a “shortcut to glory,” Nichols argues. Many see the world into a dualistic struggle between good and evil — not on the spiritual plane or on the moral level within individuals, but as a fight between their group and a hated other. Roof chose the lens of white supremacy, many choose jihad, and Chris Harper-Mercer elected the anti-religious views of a militant atheism.

In each case — bloody or not — the frustrated man finds a path to eternal significance, fighting against the people he deems responsible for his struggles or whom he simply identifies with the enemy.

He’s onto something here with his unmanly-men thesis; Progressivism has infantilized Americans as a matter of nefarious strategy, which in turn makes it easier to “fundamentally transform” us from sturdy independent sorts into hapless dependents compliant enough to allow them to get on with their social-engineering experiments without much resistance. The answer, as with almost all of our current problems, is to refute and roll back liberalism and re-establish Constitutional governance–simple-enough sounding, and anything but in practice. Read all of it.

Nov 03

Build them or perish

It’s “impractical,” “too expensive,” and “impossible” when conservatives (or Donald Trump) suggest it, and just never you mind the stark contrast between believing it impossible to get rid of 11 million illegal aliens and the permanent liberal delusion of ridding the nation of 350 million guns in the hands of people absolutely unwilling to submit to confiscation. But despite the best efforts of the world’s Leftists, many in the West are still determined that our civilization will not go gently into that good night, and sooner or later–damned near too late, if past American wartime practice is any guide–both here and elsewhere, the fences WILL be built.

Austria, a strong critic of fences built to cope with Europe’s migrant influx, on Wednesday announced it is joining other nations that have either already erected border barriers or are planning to do so. Austrian Interior Minister Johanna Mikl-Leitner insisted the move was aimed solely at bringing order to the unrelenting influx of people entering the country, telling parliament there were no plans “to build a fence around Austria.”

Still the project is a major shift for the country, which has preached the sanctity of unimpeded internal EU borders since the migrant crisis intensified earlier this year, and Mikl-Leitner herself used the world “fence” in earlier comments announcing construction plans at the border.

Slovenia, the main entry point into Austria, also said it was ready to build a fence, while Hungary has been championing the success of its razor-wire border fences with Serbia and Croatia and plans another one with Romania. Greece already erected a barbed wire fence three years ago on a section of its border with Turkey not separated by a river. Bulgaria also has fenced off parts of its boundary to Turkey, while some Baltic states plan to erect fences on border segments with Russia.

Walsh says:

When reality bites hard enough, high-minded principles go out the window.

Meanwhile, Germany — the country that started the entire “crisis” — has announced that the flood of Afghans pouring into the country of Beethoven and Einstein in order to contribute to its vibrant diversity will likely be sent home. ”People who come to us as refugees from Afghanistan cannot all expect to be able to stay in Germany,” says the German interior minister.

Angela Merkel will go down as one of the greatest villains in European history.

Or one of its greatest dupes and buffoons.

Nov 03

Steyn memorializes Fred

Shoulda guessed he’d have known him personally, if not all that well.

Rest in peace, Fred Thompson. He was a great American who lived a richer life than most of either his fellow senators or fellow actors. It was always fun when you’d stumble across him grilling someone on TV in that distinctive Tennessee drawl and it took you a moment to figure out whether it was a movie or a Congressional hearing. It happened to me a couple of months back when I came across the hugely enjoyable No Way Outwith Kevin Costner, Sean Young, Gene Hackman…and there’s Senator Thompson doing his shtick as director of the CIA. He would have made a very good CIA director. He succeeded at everything he did – law, acting, politics – until he decided to run for president. He would have been a very fine president, too, but he was not, in 2007, the best campaigner, which is a loss to America and to the world.

Amen to that. “A sharp mind in a sharp suit” indeed.

Nov 02

Annnnd here we go again

Dipping a toe at a time into yet another half-assed, halfheartedly fought, and never-to-be-won “war.”

President Obama is directing the Pentagon to send special forces into Syria to advise theSyrian opposition in its fight against ISIS, the White House said today.

The change will station U.S. special operations forces on the ground for the first time in Syria in its fight against the Islamic State after thousands of airstrikes in the past year produced mixed results, although their mission is expected to be primarily advisory.

The White House said Obama has authorized somewhere around 50 special operations forces to go into Syria to work with the rebel group known as the Syrian Arab Coalition. These forces will work along the Syrian border and not on the front lines with the rebel groups. They will provide training, assistance and advise just as U.S. troops are doing in Iraq.

And just as they did in Vietnam, the model for how America must fight–and lose–its wars of choice ever since.

50 guys? Really? Wow, the threat from IS must be dire indeed if the Liar In Thief is willing to commit a whole 50 pairs of boots on the ground to…well, whatever it is he wants us to think he’s doing over there.

“I certainly wouldn’t underestimate the capability and capacity of our U.S. special operations forces to be an important force multiplier anywhere around the world they’re deployed, and the president does expect that they can have an impact in intensifying our strategy for building the capacity of local forces inside of Syria to taking the fight on the ground to ISIL in their own country,” Earnest said, using the government’s acronym for ISIS.

Okay, can anybody out there explain to me the practical meaning of whatever it was he just said? If self-serving bafflegab and bullshit were men and materiel, we’d have conquered the entire world already.

Of course, the real missing link here is national will; without that, what we’re doing doesn’t even rise to the level of mere jerking off. And there is absolutely no, nada, zero national will to fight and win against Islam, which would be a damned difficult proposition even if the will was there. We’re too pusillanimous and gutless to call the enemy by his proper name, or admit that we have enemies at all, much less do the hard, the dirty, and the necessary to vanquish him utterly. And vanquishing him utterly is the only thing that’s going to work. Thus we get mealy-mouthed, pie in the sky bullshit like this from our benighted National “Command” “Authority”:

“The president has been quite clear that there is no military solution to the problems that are plaguing Iraq and Syria. There is a diplomatic one,” he said. “The president has put in place a multifaceted strategy to degrade and destroy ISIL and this military component to that strategy is an important part of the president’s top priority, which is the safety of the American public.”

Yeah. Right. So critically, vitally, crucially important he’s willing to send all of fifty (50) SpecWarriors under Welcome-Wagon ROEs to “engage” from an unspecified distance the most ruthless, cruel, inhuman, and deadly enemy imaginable, hiding behind a handful of inept kleptocrats who’ll cut and run at the first audible mouse fart and turn their weapons over to the enemy.

“The world’s lone superpower”? What we are is a bad joke, an international laughingstock using a hollowed-out military still resting on its WW2 laurels to big-mouth and blunder our way through a deadly-dangerous wilderness where civilized rules do not apply, and human life is without value. We come at them in the same old way, and they defeat us in the same old way: by literally handing us our heads.

As I’ve said before, I feel sorry for our men and women in uniform, many of whom are fine, capable professionals with a courage and integrity wholly absent from much of the populace they’re sworn to protect. They’re putting their lives on the line for a nation–and especially a national “leadership”–not worth a single drop of their honest sweat, much less blood. This bit is especially amusing, if only in a dark, bitter way:

During his 2013 address promising that he would never put boots on the ground in Syria, Obama said one major reason for his firm, no-troops-in-Syria policy is that Americans are “sick and tired” of aimless, unending wars in the Middle East. He even cited a combat veteran who told him that the nation was suffering from war exhaustion.

“One man wrote to me that we are ‘still recovering from our involvement in Iraq,’” Obama said. “A veteran put it more bluntly: ‘This nation is sick and tired of war.’”

In announcing the seismic change in Syria policy, White House officials failed to offer any evidence that the nation was no longer “sick and tired” of war. In fact, officials told NBC News that Obama’s new policy of deploying boots on the ground in Syria wasn’t a change in policy at all:

The move will be described as a “shift” but not a “change” in U.S. strategy against ISIS, according to another senior U.S. official. The official said the special operations forces will be stationed in northern Syria and work alongside groups with a “proven track record” of fighting ISIS.

The official quoted by NBC did not specify who these groups with “proven track record[s]” of fighting ISIS actually were. Despite spending $500 million in an effort to supply and train Syrian rebels, one senior American military official recently told Congress that only “four or five” anti-ISIS fighters were actually trained via the program.

The Obama administration is yet to publicly identify the precise, measurable goals it attends to achieve through its deployment of American combat troops in Syria.

Tell me, who’s supposed to be the “junior varsity” here again? Until this country decides it might actually have legitimate national interests, and that it isn’t too distasteful and offensive to their delicate sensibilities to defend those interests by use of necessary force, it needs to bring every last one of its troops back home. This mindless floundering and flouncing about in a war zone is way worse than just a waste of time.

Nov 02

Own it

Assigning blame for Lena Dunham.

You look at this squirrelly self-satisfied jelly roll and her mediocre talent and her bold literary tales of fingering her little sister and wonder who the hell is backing her? It’s New York. In certain parts of the city, the parts that matter in terms of media influence, she is invoked like Jesus at a Huckabee family reunion. New Yorkers love to hype their multicultural international immigrant United Colors of Benetton We Pals PBS melting pot. It’s all bullshit. New York is a roughly assembled federation of disparate clans the whitest and most assuredly self-righteous among them adoring Lena Dunham as cutting edge and fresh. Smell her. That’s not fresh.

Rancid, more like, and well past its sell-by date. If you have a strong stomach, go scope the pic of the disgusting slob and contemplate for a moment that she is exactly what Peak Progressivism looks like.

Nov 02

Great one gone

Just might have been the last of a vanishing breed.

Fred Thompson, a former U.S. senator from Tennessee, GOP presidential candidate, Watergate attorney and actor who starred on the television drama “Law and Order,” died on Sunday in Nashville. He was 73.

Mr. Thompson died after a recurrence of lymphoma, according to a prepared statement issued by the Thompson family. Mr Thompson, who had recently purchased a house in Nashville to return to Tennessee, was first diagnosed with cancer in 2004.

“It is with a heavy heart and a deep sense of grief that we share the passing of our brother, husband, father, and grandfather who died peacefully in Nashville surrounded by his family,” the Thompson family’s statement reads.

“Fred once said that the experiences he had growing up in small-town Tennessee formed the prism through which he viewed the world and shaped the way he dealt with life,” his family said. “Fred stood on principle and common sense, and had a deep love for and connection with the people across Tennessee whom he had the privilege to serve in the United States Senate. He enjoyed a hearty laugh, a strong handshake, a good cigar, and a healthy dose of humility. Fred was the same man on the floor of the Senate, the movie studio, or the town square of Lawrenceburg, his home.”

The REAL tragedy is that he didn’t win in his bid for president in 2008–although, with his integrity and sense of honor and patriotism intact, he’d probably be ill-suited to lead the kind of eye-gouging, bare-knuckles battles that will have to be fought if liberty is ever to prevail against the Goosesteppin’ Left. Those fights are going to require admitting that they’re not any sort of Loyal Opposition at all, but a dastardly enemy of Constitutional government who will stop at nothing to win; they’re going to require getting down in the gutter with them and fighting every bit as dirty as they do. I don’t think Fred would have been at all comfortable confronting that fact, sad as it is, and I’m as sure as I can be that he wouldn’t have been happy about it. But then, neither is anybody else, really.

That said, if there was anybody in the Senate–hell, in Mordor on the Potomac period (quote: “After two years in Washington, I often long for the realism and sincerity of Hollywood”)–who understood the meaning and intent of the Constitution better than Fred, and who could articulate it in a more plainspoken, common-sense way, I don’t know who it would be. Bless him; may he rest in peace. I’ll use an old category from 2008 one last time for this post; it’s a reminder of a might-have-been that might have made a world of difference to us. And I’ll let Fred have the last word:

“Maybe I needed to be reminded of what an old-timer told me years ago after I’d had some success: ‘Just remember, son, the turnout at your funeral is still going to depend a hell of a lot on the weather.'”

Farewell, Fred. The nation needed as many of your kind as it could get, but unfortunately we only had just the one.

Nov 01

“This is a lawless generation, a lawless administration where criminals go free and Americans fear their government”

Right on the merits. Wrong on the remedy.

Late last Friday the Department of Justice announced attorneys would not be issuing criminal charges to Lois Lerner, the former head of tax exempt organizations at the IRS and the woman at the center of the IRS targeting scandal.

It was no surprise DOJ announced it wasn’t pressing charges, because after all, considering DOJ attorneys colluded with Lerner on efforts to throw at least one conservative leader in jail to send a message, they’d also have to bring charges against themselves.

“We’re still in court fighting it out. The irony even in our court case is that the same attorneys that closed the investigation are also defending the IRS against us in court. This is a lawless generation, a lawless administration where criminals go free and Americans fear their government,” True The Vote President and Founder Catherine Engelbrecht said during an interview with Fox News yesterday. “It certainly makes a mockery out of everything we’ve been through over the past two years.”

It makes a mockery out of everything this country is supposed to stand for, and to be.

“By failing to indict Lois Lerner, the Obama Justice Department – or, should we say, the Obama Injustice Department – is making a mockery of this ‘investigation,’ when countless American citizens, by Ms. Lerner’s own admission, were persecuted by the Internal Revenue Service. This is a woman, after all, who looked into the camera at a national television audience and directly at a congressional committee and refused to answer their questions for fear of incriminating herself,” Tea Party Patriots President Jenny Beth Martin said in a statement. “This is just the latest evidence that the Justice Department, whether under Eric Holder or Loretta Lynch, has simply become the political hatchet-men for President Obama and his cronies throughout the Administration. Clearly, we cannot rely on the Department of Justice to provide justice. Consequently, we continue to urge Congress to vigorously investigate the IRS, Ms. Lerner, and their illegal persecution of law abiding American citizens. If Speaker-To-Be Paul Ryan wants to earn support from grassroots activists across the country, he will not let Congress rest until justice is done.”

It is to laugh. If you’re expecting justice from Congress–or from any other tentacle of this tyrannical Leviathan-state–you are doomed to eternal disappointment. Under this or any illegitimate government, the only justice–and the only real freedom–you’ll ever get is what you make for yourself.

What these people fail to realize is that a near-open war is being waged against them by the Left, using the government the Left controls as one of their many weapons. To go begging to that same government to petition for redress of grievances the government is committing against them is the height of folly. Might as well crawl to an imam and beg him to put a stop to your beheading once you’re out on the sand on your knees, in your little orange jumpsuit, with the knife at your throat.

Nov 01

Is Bernie Sanders the perfect “liberal”?

Well, he’s shockingly un-awful on the 2A. But on Pisslam? Yeah, I do believe he is.

Once again, the party of treason is leading the fight not against those who are waging a holy war to destroy us, but against those who oppose jihad terror.

The Hill reported that “Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) 16% (I-Vt.) on Wednesday invoked his ancestors’ deaths in Holocaust concentration camps as he embraced a Muslim student and promised to lead the fight against racism.” His ancestors’ deaths in Holocaust concentration camps he is likening to the fictional construct of “Islamophobia”? What craven pandering.

“Let me be very personal if I might. I’m Jewish, my father’s family died in concentration camps,” Sanders said. “I will do everything that I can to rid this country of the ugly stain of racism that has existed for far too many years.”

It’s ironic that Sanders would invoke the Holocaust in saying that he would fight against “Islamophobia,” since during World War II, the Islamic world aligned with Hitler. Haj Amin al-Husseini, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem and effectively the leader of the Muslim world, raised Muslim armies for Hitler, waged war on behalf of the Nazis in Iraq, and conducted pogroms against the Palestinian Jews in the British Mandate of Palestine.

Let’s see: self-loathing Left-wing Jew? Check. Identifying not with his own country, but with its enemies? Check. No real knowledge of history at all? Check. The precious little he does think he knows isn’t so, per Reagan’s great line? Check. Arrogance in all that ignorance? Check. Disingenuous blather about “uniting” us while dismissing anyone who disagrees with him as “racist” (NOTE TO LIBTARDS: Islam is NOT a race)? Check. Nonsensical stupidity as the only “solution” to a problem that exists only in his empty head? Check. “The personal is political”? Check. Obsessed with his own delusions, neuroses, and fears while blithely skating past the real issue? Check. Making common cause against his own country with people who will be sure he’s the first to be put up against a wall should the worst happen and they actually come to power? Check. A near-total incomprehension of the Constitution? Check.

Yep, I do believe he covers all the bases. He is the Alpha and Omega of the misbegotten mess liberalism has become. He really, really, really needs to be their nominee; he represents their wooly-pated worldview much better than Hillary ever could.

Oct 30

More trainwrecks, please

On reflection, I think the debate the other night was less of a fiasco and more of an example of the way things really ought to be. Hats off to Ben Carson and his campaign for taking the liberal/GOPe bull by the horns anyway, though:

In an interview shortly after the debate, Barry Bennett, manager of the Ben Carson campaign, called the session here in Colorado “unfair to everyone” and said the current debate structure should not remain in place. “I think the families need to get together here, because these debates as structured by the RNC are not helping the party,” Bennett said. “There’s not enough time to talk about your plans, there’s no presentation. It’s just a slugfest. All we do is change moderators. And the trendline is horrific. So I think there needs to be wholesale change here.”

Bennett said he will call Donald Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski Thursday to propose a unified call for change. “Corey and I talk regularly, so I will talk to him,” Bennett said. “I will call Frank Sadler (Carly Fiorina’s campaign manager), I will call those guys and say listen, we can choose our own network and our own format. We don’t need to be led around like prize steers.”

“I think at this point, if five or six of us get together, who generate the largest portion of the audience, we can force change,” Bennett said.

He’s not wrong about that, admittedly. But I have to say that after mulling it over a bit, I’m a lot closer to being in Tracinski’s corner.

Instead of being a chance for the Republican candidates to debate each other, the CNBC debate ended up pitting the candidates in a debate against the mainstream media.

And that’s what was awesome about it.

A presidential primary is not just an opportunity for candidates to stand around giving their policy positions or telling us the heartwarming and inspirational stories of their upbringing. It’s about putting them to the test and seeing if they can handle some of the real challenges of the job. Can they think on their feet and keep their cool? Can they make a personal connection with the average American? Can they handle stress and make decisions on the fly?

Last but not least—can they deliver a smackdown to the lamestream media?

Was the debate a train wreck? Well, modern American politics are a train wreck. Might as well search for a candidate who knows how to make his way through it.

Yep. The Praetorian Media depends for the success of their charade of fairness and objectivity on the cooperation and acquiescence of the GOP. For many years now, they’ve been able to count on that. The other night, some of the candidates withdrew that cooperation and instead began the process of crippling the Leftards and their ridiculous, nonsensical arguments by rejecting their premises outright–something I’ve argued for here way more than just once.

What I’d like to see is the truly conservative candidates continuing to be assaulted by supposedly disinterested debate “moderators” who are nothing of the sort–and the candidates turning the tables on them and ripping them to shreds for everyone watching to see. It worked beautifully for Newt Gingrich last time around, as I’ve also mentioned several times. There are a lot of people out there, probably way more than we even realize, who are hungry for just such a confrontation between real Americans and the Lying Left, and the political arena is where we’re supposed to see that conflict played out. Instead, we’ve gotten Opposition Kabuki, with the GOP rolling onto its collective belly and letting Leftymedia get away with pretending to an objectivity they don’t possess to even a slight degree.

Well, it’s time for that to stop. If conservative candidates are going to go along with GOPe collusion in these debates and let liberals run the damned things, they should show up knowing who it is they’re really debating–and how to take the fight to them for a win. It’s just another useful thing even people who don’t like him can thank Donald Trump and his outspoken pugnaciousness for inspiring and instigating.

Update! Steyn on Christie’s handling of the “shouldn’t we in fact be regulating EVERYTHING?” fantasy football question:

He was particularly good when he shoved that stupid fantasy football question down the throats of those guys. I mean, for a start, when you come out sneering, you can’t then do the cute questions, because nobody likes you. You know, you’ve come out as an unfair, biased, petty, sneering moderator, so I’m not going to play cute, little games about fantasy football as if I was a guy sitting at a bar sharing a beer with you, because I just want to break the glass over your head and ram it up into your face. And they’re quite right, Christie was quite right to hurl that question back at him. And again, by comparison with Jeb Bush playing along with the stupid question, it illustrated the strengths of those candidates who could think on their feet, and the weakness of those who can’t think on their feet.

Although I did just say we had Trump to thank for the newfound willingness of GOP candidates to stand up for themselves a bit, Christie laid the groundwork for this long-overdue insurrection back when he was first elected governor. He didn’t brook a whole lot of Lefty nonsense back then–and they hated him for it, and kept predicting his imminent downfall because of it, just as they’ve done right along with Trump. He’s certainly not nearly as popular now as he was then, not even with me. But his willingness to punch back twice as hard at “journalists” and other Progressivist reprobates ain’t the reason for it, I don’t think.

Oct 30

Halloween, we hardly knew ye

This is funny, as you would expect from Dave Barry. But then again, well, it ain’t.

But getting back to Halloween: It’s still one of the most fun holidays of the year, as well as one of the most traditional, tracing its origins back more than 2,000 years to the Druids, an ancient religious cult that constructed Stonehenge as well as most of the public toilets in England. The Druids believed that one night each year, at the end of October, the souls of the dead returned to the world of the living and roamed from house to house costumed as Power Rangers.

And thus it is that to this day, youngsters come to our door on Halloween night shouting: “Trick or treat!” According to tradition, if we don’t give the youngsters a “treat, ” their parents will “sue” us. That’s why most of us traditionally prepare for Halloween by going to the supermarket and purchasing approximately eight metric tons of miniature candy bars, which we dump into a big bowl by the door, ready to hand out to the hordes of trick-or-treaters.
The irony, of course, is that there ARE no hordes of trick-or-treaters, not any more. We in the news media make darned sure of that. Every year we publish dozens of helpful consumer-advice articles, cheerfully reminding parents of the dangers posed by traffic, perverts, poisoned candy, and many other Halloween hazards that parents would never think of if we didn’t remind them (“Have fun, but remember that this year more than 17,000 Americans will die bobbing for apples”).

The result is that many children aren’t allowed to go trick-or-treating, and the ones who ARE allowed out come to your house no later than 4:30 p.m., wearing reflective tape on their Power Rangers costumes and trailed at close range by their parents, who watch you suspiciously and regard whatever candy you hand out as though it were unsolicited mail from the Unabomber.

So for most of Halloween, your doorbell is quiet. This means that you pass the long night alone, hour after hour, just you and the miniature candy bars. After a while they start calling seductively to you from their bowl in their squeaky little voices. “Hey, Big Boy!” they call. “We’re going to waste over here!”

Halloween was great fun when I was a kid, but now that I think of it I can’t remember the last time I saw even one trick or treater in any of the various neighborhoods I’ve lived in over the years. It’s transitioned in my lifetime from being all about kids having some mostly harmless fun (unless you’re from Detroit) to being about adults getting loaded and women having an excuse to dress slutty–and in a lot of cases, living it out for a night. Neither of which I’m necessarily opposed to, mind. But it truly is sad how we’ve allowed the media and the nanny state to spook us right out of a lot of the good fun Halloween used to represent. But then, sucking the joy right out of life and keeping everyone cowed and dependent on them is what they’re all about.

(Via Debby Witt)

Update! Killjoys.

Oct 29

The ever-changing tune

Okay, I know I was just ranting about the liars of the GOP and all. But let’s sit back and allow the Father Of Lies to give us a lesson in how it’s really done.

President Obama on Tuesday dismissed the notion that he is seeking to take away people’s firearms as he delivered his latest call for stronger gun laws.

Speaking to police chiefs in Chicago, Obama sought to rebut the argument made by conservatives, which he said is designed to stoke fear.

“Some of you are watching certain television stations or listening to certain radio programs, please do not believe this notion that somehow I’m out to take everyone’s guns away,” he told the International Association of Chiefs of Police.

“Every time a mass shootings happens, one of the saddest ironies is suddenly the purchase of guns and ammunition jumps up because folks scared into thinking that, ‘Obama’s gonna use this as an excuse to take away our Second Amendment rights,’” he added. “Nobody’s doing that.”

Nobody but you, and everyone who thinks like you. Anyone remember this, from all of a couple of weeks ago?

“We know that other countries, in response to one mass shooting, have been able to craft laws that almost eliminate mass shootings,” the president said. “Friends of ours, allies of ours — Great Britain, Australia, countries like ours. So we know there are ways to prevent it.”

And this, from even further back in antiquity?

Couple of decades ago, Australia had a mass shooting, similar to Columbine or Newtown. And Australia just said, well, that’s it, we’re not doing, we’re not seeing that again, and basically imposed very severe, tough gun laws, and they haven’t had a mass shooting since.

Our levels of gun violence are off the charts. There’s no advanced, developed country that would put up with this.

And there’s no truly free, self-respecting polity that would put up with the likes of you anywhere near the levers of power. No, nobody’s trying to take anyone’s guns away. Except when they are.

My GOD, the balls on this scurrilous douchebag.

Oct 29

Fooled again

A very good question for these collusionists: what the hell did you think was gonna happen, anyway?

After the GOP did its post-2012 “autopsy” one of the things we were promised was debate moderators who weren’t all barking DNC-inspired questions like trained chihuahuas.

What we got was Wednesday’s atrocity, a liberal hack fest that was so egregious even left-leaning Vanity Fair was quick to criticize it.

Even more bizarre than the fact that someone as incompetent as John Harwood has been able to hold down any kind of job was Reince Priebus hitting social media to complain, as he is the one responsible for approving tonight’s disaster.

Then Priebus promised to do what he already promised to do.

Yeah, well, as Glenn likes to say about a certain other someone: every GOP promise comes with an expiration date, you know.

The giant debt ceiling increase rolled together with a budget deal was introduced at 11:36 p.m. Monday, in the dead of night, several congressional sources confirm to Breitbart News.

The text is 144 pages long and increases the debt ceiling beyond when President Barack Obama leaves office, all the way until March 2017.  It also, according to Politico, increases spending by $50 billion this year and $30 billion more the following year.

As AP reports, House Speaker is pushing for a Wednesday vote, this would be yet another instance in which he has broken his promise to give members and the public three full days—72 hours—to read legislation before voting on it.

Hey, if you like lies, big government, false promises they have no intention of keeping, and out of control spending in perpetuity–but want to pretend otherwise–the GOP’s your party. Otherwise: not so much.

Update! Cruz takes it to ’em, for all the good it will do.

CRUZ: The questions that have been asked so far in this debate, illustrate why the American people don’t trust the media. This is not a cage match. And if you look at the questions, Donald Trump, are you a comic book villain? Ben Carson, can you do the math? John Kasich, can you insult two people over here? Marco Rubio, why don’t you resign? Jeb Bush, why have your numbers fallen? How about talking about the substantive issues — 

QUINTANILLA: Does this count? Do we get credit for this one?

CRUZ: And Carl, I’m not finished yet. The contrast with the Democratic debate, where every fawning question from the media was, which of you is more handsome and wise?

CNBC: Let me say, you have 30 seconds left to answer should you choose to do so.

CRUZ: Let me be clear. The men and women on this stage have more ideas, more experience, more common sense, than every participant in the Democratic debate. That debate reflected a debate between the Bolsheviks and the Menchavicks. Nobody watching at home believes that any of the moderators have any intention of voting in a Republican primer. The questions being asked shouldn’t be trying to get people to tear into each other, it should be what are your substantive — 

CNBC: I asked you about the debt limit and got no answer.

Oh, you got an answer all right, you lying-Left piece of shit. You just didn’t like it very much. That’s okay though, real Americans don’t like you very much either. But as I said before: what the hell did the GOP think was going to happen here? They keep complaining about this crap, they keep promising to end it–which they could, simply by refusing to go along with it and going elsewhere to debate–and they keep crawling right back. Why, one might almost conclude that there’s a larger, hidden agenda here or something–an agreement to cooperate in dragging America ever leftward, say. If one was paranoid and cynical and such, I mean.

Updated update! More from McCarthy:

While expressing outrage over the mockery the moderators made of the debate, RNC Chairman Reince Priebus conveniently neglected to mention that the deal to have CNBC run the show was cut by none other than … Reince Priebus — notwithstanding its vow to avoid more Candy Crowley debacles, the RNC keeps going back to the same Democrat-media well. 

They certainly do. Then they whine about it afterwards, as if they were totally helpless to do anything at all about it, which is patently untrue, all of which ought to sound pretty damned familiar from these frauds. Gee, wonder why? Maybe the only possible answer is just to keep electing more Republicrats, people! They’ll get things turned around one of these days, you bet.

Oct 29

Islamic Blitzkrieg

An idea whose time has probably come:

The question is: can the Europeans rediscover the Will to survive?

As of now, the future belongs to the would-be Eurabians. They have the Passion.

Two more questions arise…

How soon before the Throne of Charlemagne is blown-up?

Is there a modern Charles Martel or Alfred The Great out there?…or, as a last resort, Vlad The Impaler?

SIDENOTE: People like the Koch Brothers should really be forming paramilitary units for the purposes of rescuing what European Treasures they can, such as the aforementioned Throne, the Mona Lisa, Michelangelo’s David and Pieta, Magna Carta, etc..

Steyn adds:

Given the number of actual flesh-and-blood people being slaughtered by ISIS, some folks say they can’t see the point of complaining about the destruction of architectural and artistic treasures. But there is method to the Islamic State’s madness. As part of its cultural totalitarianism, Islam has a long track record, wherever it sets foot, of obliterating the pre-Islamic past. Why? To ensure there’s nothing to go back to. There can be no return to greatness, because there is no longer any record of that greatness – only a void that Mohammed filled. In the past, there is desert. In the present, there is only Islam. And so, in the future, for want of any alternative, there can only be Islam.

Oh, there’s a method to their madness, all right. Which is all the more reason to stop them in their tracks–while we still can.

Update! Better have our modern-day Martel, should he ever arrive, get to work on protecting the Jewish trees too.

None of those things are obstacles to peace. If they were, surely the media would have told us so.

The real threats are the fig, palm and carob trees around a hiking path near Jerusalem. The true threat to peace comes from the pine trees that shade the kids playing in the water in a Ma’ale Adumim park.

The pine tree, you see, is a Jewish tree.

As anti-Israel activist Michael Davis accuses, “This foreign tree displaced the olive trees of the indigenous population.” The “indigenous” population he mentions were the Muslim conquerors while the “foreigners” are the Jewish indigenous population who were planting the “foreign” Jerusalem pine trees that are mentioned in the Bible by that notorious foreigner, the Prophet Isaiah.

The trees of Israel were displaced not by the Jews, but by the Ottoman Caliphate building a railroad to the Muslim holy cities of Mecca and Medina. Charcoal for Allah’s magic railroad consumed what few forests existed in Israel under Muslim rule and every tenth fruit bearing tree. Then the Zionists, in addition to planting trees, also thumbed their noses at the Caliphate and blew up its holy railroad.

No one cuts down forests for charcoal and the train no longer runs through Israel to Medina anymore.

 But facts, like trees, are obstacles to peace. And if we’re ever going to have peace, we need to do something about the Jewish facts and the Jewish trees. And the Jews who produce facts and trees.

Those darn pesky Jews. And facts. Read the rest; it’s an examination of one of the more bizarre eructations of idiocy from one of the premier sources of bizarreness and idiocy in the world today: Islam. And bizarre and idiotic as this tree business is, since it’s Islam, you know there’s room for expansion on the theme:

The Muslim resistance fighters of Hamas recently arrested a dolphin who was caught spying for the Jewish State. Hezbollah busted an eagle working for the Jews, Sudan took down a spy vulture and Egypt arrested a Zionist duck (or possibly a Zionist stork). Iran nabbed 14 squirrels for spying for Israel.

And with squirrels, it’s just a hop and a skip to the trees.

And from there to the loony bin, I guess.

Oct 29

“…Something he said will ‘haunt his dreams forever.'”

Mine too.

Police are calling this a crime of the unthinkable, something that most people would never imagine doing. On Monday, police were called to a Louisiana Walmart under the suspicion that a customer was shoplifting food. According to the complaint, a Walmart worker radioed security about a suspicious woman in the meat aisle. Security cameras filmed 33-year-old Shaniqua Johnson shoving sausages under her shirt. CCTV footage then shows the woman walking to the bathroom, where she remained for at least 30 minutes.

The male security guard says he knocked on the bathroom door several times but the woman did not respond. He then announced he was entering. What he found behind the door of the unlocked stall is something he said will “haunt his dreams forever.” The security guard reports when he entered the stall, Johnson was inappropriately pleasing herself with a Jimmy Dean package of sausage. He said that when he entered “She didn’t even stop. She just stared at me and kept going.”

Go take a gander at the picture of the poor thing, and then ask yourself: what the hell else was she supposed to do? Although honestly, I have to say I feel even more sorry for the sausage. It’s the real victim here.

(Via razorbacker)

Oct 29

No bacon please, we’re Moslems

Matt wonders about the recent removal of The Other White Meat from prison menus:

The inmates just don’t like pork they claim.

Sure prison kitchens can probably manage to fuck up pork products to some degree but still. Consider me highly skeptical about this new stealth halal prison cuisine.

Well, I’d say there’s probably a lot of truth to the notion that most prisoners “just don’t like” pork. But there’s a perfectly logical reason for that too:

The statistics are staggering, and woefully out of date. One out of three African-American inmates in U.S. prisons convert to Islam while incarcerated.

This statistic is no longer limited to African-Americans in prison. The Huffington Post reported an estimated 35,000 – 40,000 inmates convert to Islam each year, and that 15 percent of the total U.S. prison population or 350,000 inmates are Muslim.

This is more than 18 times the national representation of Muslims in America, reported to be 0.8 percent. Prisons are churning out converts to Islam who are taught they are righteously entitled to control the religion, speech, and dress of family, co-workers and strangers.

And in turn, there’s a reason for that as well:

The key to conversion success is clear. Our government has been contracting and paying Muslim Brotherhood front groups, such as GSISS (The Graduate School of Islamic and Social Sciences) and ISNA (Islamic Society of North America) to screen and assign Muslim prison chaplains for at least 8 years.

While Egypt and Saudi Arabia have banned the Muslim Brotherhood, classifying it as a terror group, the White House, U.S. prisons, and the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security continue to work with Muslim Brotherhood groups.

But hey, in much the same fashion that Republicrats call for defeating the Democrat Socialists by “reaching across the aisle,” “working with the Democrats,” and looking for ways to make “bipartisan compromises” with them, our masters are certain that the way to win our supposed “war” against Moslem terrorism is by “working with,” umm, Moslem terrorists. The Moslem Brotherhood, like the Iranians, are our “partners in peace,” don’tchaknow.

Personally, I’d be fine with taking a page from Sheriff Joe and feeding them nothing but rancid, greenish bologna sandwiches and other “surplus” foods sourced from disreputable suppliers. If they eat, fine. If they don’t…hey, that’s fine, too. It’s prison, people. It ain’t supposed to be a holiday at the Ritz.

Oct 28

Police brutality?

Or just deserts for thuggish intransigence?

While I hardly claim to have grown up (or live) on the wrong side of the tracks, I’ve seen multiple police interventions in my 46 years on this planet — including in my own high school in the 1980s — and I’ve never seen the police be gentle when a person resists arrest. The use of physical force is never elegant, it’s always potentially dangerous, and it’s always easy to critique from a distance. Lawlessness typically leaves a police officer with options that simply don’t look good on camera.

As for the Vox critique of police officers in public schools – which writer German Lopez called “outsourcing discipline to the police” – let’s not forget that in this instance the school appealed to the officer only after a teacher and an administrator failed to get results. I’ve known multiple public-school teachers who were grateful for police assistance after spending years getting punched, kicked, bitten, and otherwise physically abused by their students. I distinctly remember seeing my own teachers tossed around like rag dolls by angry students during raging hallway brawls. At some schools, even small children will attack and harm their teachers.

America’s opinion and law-making classes – walled off in doorman-fronted buildings, gated communities, and generally growing up in the best educational environments – are making judgments about behaviors and police reactions that are utterly alien to their experience. Having little to no exposure to physical conflict, they have no idea how difficult it is to move an unwilling person, and having blessedly lived in the absence of physical fear, they have no real idea how a human being responds to physical danger. But that won’t stop them from opining about police conduct, condemning cops because they’re insufficiently graceful when exerting physical force on a defiant person, and then being self-righteously certain that dissent from their authoritative view is motivated by hate and bigotry.

The arrested student at Spring Valley High School should have left her seat when her teacher demanded that she leave. She should have left when the administrator made the same demand. She should have left when Fields made his first, polite requests. She had no right to stay. She had no right to end classroom instruction with her defiance. Fields was right to move her, and he did so without hurting her. The fact that the incident didn’t look good on camera doesn’t make his actions wrong. Unless additional evidence emerges, the Spring Valley video is going viral for all the wrong reasons.

Y’all already know I am by no means a knee-jerk defender of the cops, but here’s the plain truth: the arrested “student” ought to have known better. She was a disruptive, defiant, out of control, quite likely dangerous dumbass. She was also black, which doesn’t really have much bearing on the case except for the fact that most of the troublemakers in public schools, as with most of the people committing crimes in urban areas, are–and THAT inconvenient truth, along with her moronic behavior here, gives some insight into what her overall character and attitude is likely to be like, and what her response to reasonable attempts to discipline her is likely to be as well.

Who does she consider to be her peers; whose respect and admiration does she seek? Are her role models the “good-doing” kids who study and work hard, respect and revere their parents (who themselves are usually derided in ghetto culture as sellouts and Uncle Toms), and don’t skirt the edges of criminality until finally graduating into urban-culture-approved Thug Life? Or are they the petty criminals and gang-bangers for whom school is nothing more than a holding pattern until their matriculation into the world of lawlessness, violence, and our revolving-door justice system? Those insights in turn will determine how legal authority deals with her for the rest of her life, unless she smartens up and turns herself around.

Bottom line: tough shit for her. She got what she had coming. If her parents had given her a good, righteous ass-kicking long ago, she probably wouldn’t have taken the one in the video (although that’s by no means a certainty; she may well be just that hopelessly stupid). She will most likely get a lot worse in the coming years, and she’ll be bringing it on herself via her own dull-witted intransigence. She’ll prey on society until she’s removed from it, a parasite on the very people upon whose mild tolerance and good will she depends for her subsistence.

That there are so many blank fools like her in the public schools–disrupting classes, threatening teachers, and harassing the kids who are actually trying to learn–and that their insolence and aggression is tolerated at all is the real outrage here. And it is in no way the fault of the cops. Instead of being ashamed of herself for what happened in that video, she’ll instead wind up celebrated as a hero by not only her worthless, indolent peers but by other fools who can’t or won’t see the damage they’re doing–not just to her, but to the schools generally, and to society at large. The cop will lose his job and become a pariah who’ll have a hard time getting a graveyard shift job as a convenience-store security guard. And brilliant “liberals” will scratch their heads and wonder how it came to pass that they don’t dare leave their gated communities after dark, and will continue to demand gun control to curb the violence in the lawless ghettos their policies have created.

Oct 28

Jubilee!

Talk about killjoys.

We have all read the stories about fraternities being punished for ethnically themed parties, or Miley Cyrus and Iggy Azalea appropriating black music and dance. We have seen screeds against racist Halloween costumes. On a more serious note, the Gilbert and Sullivan operetta “The Mikado” has been attacked for this. Earlier this year, the New York Gilbert and Sullivan Society cancelled its performance of the classic work, amid criticism that its cast was too white.

But in America there is one culture that anyone and everyone is free to appropriate. White culture, be it classical music, the novel, or the business suit, is never the subject of claims of appropriation. Last week, a perfect example of this disparity was on display in an announcement from the theater world. Howlround, a website that describes itself as a theater commons and has a strong influence on the theater community, announced its call for 2020 to be a Jubilee year to promote diversity in theater.

What form will this Jubilee take? Well, it’s a doozy: “We declare the year 2020 the year of Jubilee. For the 2020–2021 season, all performances produced in the United States of America will be by women, people of color, artists of varied physical and cognitive abilities, and LBGTQA artists. Every theatre large and small is included in the vision…This is also a time for straight, white men to rejoice, to witness, to listen, and to be fed for one year by the stories they’ve also been denied. “

On its face, this is absurd nonsense.

Yeah, it would seem to be at first glance. Also at second, third, fourth, and fifth glances. At the sixth, it starts to look more like horseshit on stilts.

The idea that any American artists would seek to officially prohibit—in other words, ban—any artist’s work on the basis of his or her race or gender is mind-numbing. It is also quite likely that any theater company without an ethnically based mission that officially signed onto this plan would be breaking the law. Finally, it’s obviously not going to happen. But for all its preening silliness, this Jubilee fiasco tells us something interesting about cultural appropriation.

Theater as we know it—its customs, forms, and practices—has a distinct and traceable cultural legacy. From the Greeks to the Romans to Shakespeare and Stanislavsky, theater was unquestionably primarily developed by white people. And because theater is thousands of years old, most of those white people were men.

Howlround is not only asking that everyone be able to participate in this white cultural legacy, a noble goal, but they are going so far as to ban participation by the very people who have the greatest claim to ownership of the art form. Of course, no white person has any special ownership of theater. Nobody would ever claim that they do. That being the case, how can minorities have special ownership of their culture’s customs, forms, and practices?

Because, that’s why. And that’s about all the logic, rationality, or depth you’ll ever get from the miserable, juiceless twits.

This amalgamation of cultural appropriation and privilege theory creates a situation in which white culture is open-source and minority culture is proprietary. Nobody gets upset when Yo-Yo Ma plays the hell out of Bach. Nobody asks him to pay homage or royalties to white culture. As a result, white culture is open to everyone. It is the cultural lingua franca that binds together Americans’ understanding of the world.

The proponents of privilege theory and the concept of cultural appropriation seek to decentralize whiteness but, ironically, they are doing precisely the opposite. They are guaranteeing the central role that white culture plays by insisting it is the only culture that belongs to all of us. The price of this proprietary power play is steep. It encourages division and denies all of us the full flower of our shared human cultural history.

There is not a white person alive who invented the novel, there is not a black person alive who invented jazz, there is not a Japanese person alive who invented Kabuki. So no person alive can claim or assign ownership of the products of any culture.

None but a childish, arrogant “liberal” would even dream of trying. Or would care in the first place. I especially like the closing line to this post, which you’ll have to click on through to read.

Older posts «