With only 9 months of reporting data, NOAA was already able to announce “Hottest Year Ever.” But to be fair, they knew well in advance that their data would show 2023 to be the hottest year ever, not only because NOAA “adjusts” much of the data they gather, but even more shockingly, because they fabricate much of the rest of the data inputs from decommissioned stations!
Meteorologist John Shewchuk has been researching NOAA’s hundreds of “ghost stations.” These are climate stations that were once in operation, but aren’t any longer. They might have been removed, or maybe they just quit operating and were never repaired, but NOAA continues to fabricate estimate temperature data for these formerly operational stations.
It gets even worse. As I’ll show in just a moment, aside from the fabricated reports from the USHCN ghost stations, NOAA adjusts the actual readings from stations that are still functioning, to support the climate hoax.
The table immediately below from the Belle Glade station is much simpler to read than it looks, and it reveals both types of fraud that NOAA is committing: 1) the adjustment of temperature data; and 2) the fabrication of temperature data.
In blue is the actual Raw data produced by the Belle Glade station until it went dark in 2005. Each row represents a year, for instance the first year is 2000. The 12 numbers that follow are the 12 average monthly temperatures for that station, shown as Celsius x 100. Therefore, the average temperature in January 2000 was 25.12° Celsius. In February 2000 the average temperature was 25.50° Celsius. (-9999 means that no reading was recorded.)
Below that table in red is the official NOAA temperature data, where two things stand out.
1) NOAA has adjusted the actual Raw data. That 25.12°C temperature for January 2000 was warmed up to 25.21°C. February 2000 was similarly adjusted from 25.50°C to 25.60°C.
2) Despite Belle Glade going offline in 2005, NOAA continues to report temperature data for that imaginary station. The “E” by the temperature indicates that this is an estimated temperature, however, that estimate is still included in the official temperature record.
With NOAA’s history of anti-scientific fraud, it should be assumed at this point that any data NOAA publishes is a fabrication.
My previous documentation of NOAA’s fraud was the progenitor of a commenter’s quote that gave birth to Throckmorton’s Razor and Minuteman’s Corollary:
Throckmorton’s Razor: “Assume that any authority which has previously provided false data is always acting dishonestly.”
Minuteman’s Corollary: “Discount everything a liar says in his argument, even if it may support your position.”
NOAA has so thoroughly compromised its integrity with its pattern of politically motivated fraud, that not only do I not believe its reporting of temperatures or tropical storm wind speeds any longer, but I don’t even trust it to accurately report the dew point. Every piece of weather data produced by NOAA should be assumed to be fraudulent.
It most certainly should, right along with any and every other syllable shat forth from any and every FederalGovCo “scientist,” “expert,” or spokescritter’s filthy maw. It’s a sad, sorry state of affairs, and an awful fix for Real Americans to find themselves in, but it also happens to be the plain and simple truth.
3
2
- Entries
Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus.
“Every piece of weather data produced by NOAA should be assumed to be fraudulent.”
And that is because it is all fraudulent. Every damn bit of it.
Someone should Project Veritas their shenanigans.
1) Without telling them, erect actual weather stations at any number of the sites of their “ghost stations”, for which they put out bullshit imaginary data.
2) At the end of the year compile the actual data.
3) Then publish the real data alongside the figures NOAA pulls out of its own ass.
4) Once the fudge factor is reliably estimated, revise NOAA’s bullshit numbers back to reality, and leave them standing there with their pants around their own ankles and their lying asscheeks flapping in the breeze, and to a metaphysical certainty, prove that the whole Climastrology Cult is nothing but a huge mountain of unicorn shit in service of pimping for tax dollars while crippling the Western world, exactly as designed.
It might be worth doing but it’s not going to change any minds. By this point, anyone still believing in the climate castostrophe has his ego bound up in it and no science, facts, logic, or evidence of fraud is going to get him to admit that he was wrong.
See also: “January 6 was an insurrection”, “Republicans commit vote fraud more than Democrats do”, etc.
“…but it’s not going to change any minds.”
I disagree. It might not change all of them, but it might change a few. I’ve heard some people of reasonable intelligence say things that make me realize they just don’t pay attention and have no idea they are being lied to.
Exactly so.
This is a zero-sum game, and everyone who flips now without any bloodshed, doesn’t need waterboarding or woodchipping come the days of deliverance.
Victims, even of their own lazy stupidity, are generally worth an attempt to save. Volunteers, not so much.