If you aren’t, and particularly if you’re a Dad, get ready to be.
Sophie, an 11 year old girl, was abducted by her dad because of a “bitter custody dispute.” They were eventually found in Mexico, and police successfully reunited the girl with her mother and her mother’s new fiancé. The father is facing felony charges and will get up to 3 years in prison, if convicted.
But he told DailyMail.com, in an exclusive interview that took place the day before the warrant was issued, that the only way he will return to court and bring his daughter home is if he is allowed to put his case before a jury.
OK, well that’s his right. Don’t we all have a right to a jury trial? Not so fast.
Ex-wife Kelly Long opposed the jury trial in a motion and asked for Long to be summarily jailed for 18 months plus an extra year on one count of hiding Sophie and another for failing to hand her over.
Michael was ordered in July to pay $20,000 to cover the cost of reunification therapy for Sophie and her mother, as well as therapy for her two brothers, his sons.
That’s the story, but it’s also a lie. Watch this video to understand why the father wanted to hide his daughter from her mother…
Police dismissed the ‘patently false’ information about her. Egged on by mom’s attorney, they called it part of Trump’s quest for power, and part of the “QAnon” plot. They even got the dad’s gofund me shut down as being “fraud.”
Sophie claimed she was sexually abused by her mother’s fiancée Jacob Bellington and was diagnosed with a vaginal infection after being taken to the hospital last summer. That didn’t matter.
She was also interviewed by a specialist nurse with her father outside the room and repeated the claims to her. That didn’t matter.
The courts then took custody away from the father, and banned him from having visitation. So, realizing that his ex-wife and her new Swedish boyfriend were going to continue raping his daughter, did what anyone would do—he grabbed her and took off.
Of course, the ex-wife paints all of this as being a custody stunt, and the courts believed her. They have painted him as a “fraudster” who “coached his daughter to lie” about her mother and mother’s new fiancé.
This is how our courts work. Any man who has been through a divorce, especially one involving custody, can tell you how it works. If the woman wants “her kids,” the courts take her side. She gets the kids, she gets child support, the (now ex)-husband has to pay her legal tab. The assumption is that children belong with their mother. End of story. The only thing Dad is good for, is paying the bills.
It’s nothing more than a shakedown, aided and assisted by our courts. That’s why so many men are realizing the truth—marriage is largely a losing game, and the only winning move is to not play at all. The MSM, as well as women’s magazines are all in an uproar, trying to figure out why men don’t want to get married any more. They blame easy access to sex, and they are all wrong.
There’s so much wrong here it’s difficult to know where to even begin cataloging it. But, as DM says, any Dad who has ever been involved in a bitter custody dispute with an ex can tell you right quick what our rotten-to-the-core “justice” system is, and is not.
3
- Entries
It would have been much cheaper for the dad to have the mom and “new dad” killed. Men, take note.
Women, you should take note. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: You’ve created a system in which it is safer and easier to kill you than it is to risk a false claim of date rape, risk a divorce in which kids and decades of accumulated wealth will be taken, risk a false claim of sexual harassment in the workplace. I think that before long, many women will come to regret their words and actions over the years.
There’s no doubt divorce sucks and custody battles are horrible. I’d also say there’s no way our judicial system could get more corrupt but I’m sure they’d go indict Trump for spitting on the sidewalk just to prove me wrong.
That said, the answer isn’t to give up and take your dick home and just jerk off for the rest of your life. Giving up and quitting has never solved any problem. Perhaps try being a bit more discerning first. Don’t look at women from cities, never date a Democrat or a vegan, make sure she’s a genuinely happy person and still has friends that she’s known from grade school.
Also, marriage failure is not always the woman’s fault. If you believe that “marriage is largely a losing game, and the only winning move is to not play at all” then you’d probably be a lousy husband and you should not get married.
But lets take this advice out to its logical conclusion. So, if the men aren’t going to get married, do they still want to reproduce? Because if they think they won’t have to pay child support to their baby mamas then they’re delusional. And if they think a non-married man would have any more influence over what the baby mama does with the baby, well that’s just retarded. So, married or not married, still gotta pay money for the baby and still have no say in what happens to the baby.
That leaves not getting married and not reproducing. Is it really that hard to see where this leads? The brilliant advice from this genius is basically telling white men not to reproduce and just let their race die out. Personally, I think this is just insanely dumb. But, you know, if white men really are this pussified now, maybe the world would be a better place without such cowardly losers.
A better option than checking out of the gene pool is to do your best to stay married after you get married. Its really not all that hard unless you chose poorly to begin with.
I lack the time and desire to write a full refutation of your nonsense, so I’ll simply suggest that you look at the divorce statistics and in particular which side predominantly files for divorce, the female delusion calculator, domestic violence statistics — the real ones, not the FBI numbers –, infidelity rates by gender, paternity fraud numbers, and so on. You might also compare what you wrote here with what Joe Rogan had been saying until his divorce.
As the old saw goes: there are three sides to every story–his side her side, and the truth. Always liked that one, although anyone who thinks that men can reasonably expect a fair shake in divorce court given the shit-circus the American system of “justice” has become is fooling himself.
Or is, y’know, single, therefore needn’t trouble himself about it.
Oh, and full disclosure: when my parents split back in ’79 or so, even though my mom was at fault in the strictly legal, technical sense, it was after she’d endured twenty-odd years of mental cruelty and abuse from my dad, who was a wonderful father but a pretty lousy husband. Much of that abuse I witnessed myself, only coming to understand what was going on when I had reached my teenage years; when they sat me and my brother down to tell us they were divorcing, I can’t honestly say it came as much of a surprise, although me and my brother wound up staying with my dad when my mom moved out, a choice I’ve never regretted even slightly. Take all that for whatever it might be worth.
With 80% of divorces in the US being filed by women, it beggars the imagination to think that all are the long-suffering victims of abusive or worthless husbands.
Ref the old saw about anecdotes and data. But if we’re tossing anecdotes around, I was one of the minority of men who filed for divorce, about 25 years ago. My wife had moved out (because she wasn’t happy, and justified with claims I was abusive and controlling and all the rest of the litany, including that I was flirting with her former students — and note that she had been a middle school teacher before being fired from four jobs in a row, so her former students were just a bit younger than I was interested in) but didn’t want to get divorced because it would be shameful in her family’s eyes and so she could keep spending my money. I wanted to get on with my life and be separated from her spending and her debts. (New York was formerly a community property state, so she could open credit cards in her name and the companies would come after me for payment.)
Moreover, note that the times, they are a-changin’. The dating, marital, and divorce landscape now is nothing like it was forty or fifty years ago. From tales I hear from people in their thirties and older who are dating, dating is not like it was five or ten years ago. (Take that last with a grain of salt as I’m not dating and haven’t seen it myself, plus anecdotes versus data.)