Home > Press Two for English > Gathering steam

Gathering steam

March 20th, 2007

Yep, Fred’s my guy alright:

I think its time for a little plain talk to the leaders of Mexico. Something like:

Hey guys, you’re our friends and neighbors and we love you but it’s time you had a little dose of reality. A sovereign nation loses that status if it cannot secure its own borders and we are going to do whatever is necessary to do so, although our policies won’t be as harsh as yours are along your southern border. And criticizing the U.S. for alternately doing too much and too little to stop your illegal activities is not going to set too well with Americans of good will who are trying to figure a way out of the mess that your and our open borders policy has already created.

My friends, it’s also time for a little introspection. Since we all agree that improving Mexico’s economy will help with the illegal-immigration problem, you might want to consider your own left-of-center policies. For example, nationalized industries are not known for enhancing economic growth. Just a thought. But here’s something even more to the point that you might want to think about: What does it say about the leadership of a country when that country’s economy and politics are dependent upon the exportation of its own citizens?

Sure kicks the crap out of that “I’ll work hard to please my Mexican constituents” bushwa RINO George was inanely spouting from south of the “border” last week.

Run, Fred. Run.

Update! John Fund speaks with the man behind the movement. He’s the Juggernaut, bitch!

  • Share/Bookmark
Comments appear entirely at the whim of the guy who pays the bills for this site, and may be deleted, edited, ridiculed, or otherwise pissed over as he in his capricious fancy sees fit. Thank you.
  1. March 20th, 2007 at 16:16 | #1
    I'll shovel coal on the Thompson Express.
    Run, Fred. Run!
  2. March 20th, 2007 at 16:22 | #2
    He could just be the man to bring our side back to life, I think. Only problem I have with him really is his vote for CFR, and he's pretty much disavowed that as a mistake already. Which sets him apart from McCain pretty nicely, if you ask me.
  3. March 20th, 2007 at 16:32 | #3
    We certainly need something to give the Congre-zombies some life. It sure won't be RINO Rudy or McVain.

    I'll settle for a candidate who's serious about the WoT and immigration. That Thompson is better in other areas, too, (re pro-gun) is just icing on the cake.

    Run, Fred. Please?

  4. March 20th, 2007 at 16:55 | #4
    He's playing us like a fiddle. Can't say as I dislike the tune.

    He's not perfect. I'm not going to swoon. But I will say he would be the best candidate for conservative values and for electability if he declared today, IMNAAHO.

  5. March 20th, 2007 at 18:53 | #5
    Re the update with the Fund article: I'm beginning to feel a little swoonage here. Admit it, Al - you are, too.
  6. March 20th, 2007 at 19:16 | #6
    It's more than just that, guys; I know I'm not the only one here who gets a very Reagan-esque whiff of eminent electability off the guy. He's got that plainspoken, no-nonsense, bone-deep patriotic air about him that Reagan had in 1980.

    I still say it's way too early to be bothered much about this stuff; where I am now, it's currently 74 degrees and lovely out. There are beers to be quaffed, songs to be sung, and motorcycle rides to be taken before we get bogged down in election crap.

    But see, that's just it: Fred seems to know that too. And if you think that sensible, ordinary Americans don't pick up on that, and admire it...well, you're probably among those who thought Dukakis had a prayer, or Mondale/Ferraro, too. And you're just as wrong now as you were then.

  7. March 20th, 2007 at 21:10 | #7
    I just hope his sidekick, that lovely Mr. Waterston fellow, runs with him. With all his legal experience, first defending Boo Radley, then prosecuting a Mark Levin-like talk show host in Manhattan... He'd make a great vice president.

    Actually, given the choice and the smoking crater that's going to be the veep's office after the Dems get done with Cheney, I'd just as soon vote for Mariska Hargitay as veep. They say that you vote for pres/veep based in part on who you'd like to see on your TV set every night. Well, especially in light of her bloodlines, Mariska would work for me...

  8. March 20th, 2007 at 21:46 | #8
    Well, by the time the Commiecrats in Congress get done with their current project -- unconstitutionally stripping every last bit of executive power from the executive branch and granting it to themselves, the Green lobby, the unions, and ANSWER, plus anyone else who may have bribed their way into their legislative good graces -- the position of President and Veep both are going to be largely ceremonial anyway.
Comments are closed.