Makes sense. Australia put in tyrannical gun-grab laws almost 30 years ago, virtually guaranteeing that the law-abiding subjects will be disarmed and wholly dependent on the police to protect them.
Right. There are pictures of at least two (female) Australian police officers standing with their hands up near the massacre and one of a (probably female) Australian police office hiding during the shooting.
So of course the tyrants sing the same note as always: we need to crack down even harder on guns!
And of course there is no word of expelling the demographic which is by far the most likely to perpetrate massacres (and rapes and one-off murders).
Australia’s leaders are either too stupid to understand crime statistics or they are deliberately inflicting the invasion on their disarmed populace.
If they’re stupid, then they should not be allowed to manage their own finances or other adult decisions.
If they’re doing it deliberately, then they’re traitors and should be executed.
- Entries
Somebody elsewhere, can’t recollect where, laid out the sequence of events: first they strip you of the means of self-defense; then they make self-defense actually, literally against the law; then they hire a bunch of cowards to provide for your “defense.” Gee, thanks a pantload, fucktards.
The new twist is to defund the police, get rid of any good ones, then later hire cowards and thugs that they need to get that end result or to intimidate law abiding citizens.