Working-class hero attacked by drooltards for daring to question The One
They’re all for Joe Sixpack — except when they ain’t:
Some idiot liberal bloggers are saying there is a big scandal because Joe the Plumber doesn’t make $250,000 and would (GASP) actually get a tax cut under Obama’s plan! I could not make the case against their liberal socialist plan any better than they themselves are. Hey, rocket scientists, here is what Joe said: “I’m getting ready to buy a company that makes about 250, 270 – 80 thousand dollars a year, your new tax plan is going to tax me more isn’t it? I’m getting taxed more and more for fulfilling the American dream.” Got that? He didn’t say he makes that now. You should have gotten the clue when he said “I am getting ready to buy a company.” Evidently the Obama talking points went out saying Joe doesn’t make $250,000 and the idiot lib bloggers ate it up and didn’t bother watching the actual comment Joe the Plumber made, but rather reported this fact as some big Republican lie.
Brace yourself, Joe. The Obama Thugocracy is gunning for you.
Yep. Shouting down dissenting voices is what liberal fascists are best at, after all. Meanwhile, Joe sets knucklehead “journalist” Diane Sawyer straight with some more of that good old American common sense, a quality newsrooms and other bastions of liberal “thought” are utterly bereft of:
Sawyer: “Well if people making $250,000 should not be taxed additionally — by the way, it’s 3% from 36% to 39% under Senator Obama’s plan. If those people should not be taxed additionally, even though they’re in the top 5% of America, what about people who make $1 million? Or $5 million?”
Wurzelbacher: “Well, I mean, quite honestly, why should they be penalized for being successful. I mean, that’s what you’re telling me. That’s what it sounds like you’re saying. That’s wrong. Because you’re successful, you have to pay more than everybody else? We all live in this country. It’s a basic right. And Obama wants to take that basic right and penalize me for it, is what it comes down to. That’s a very socialist view and it’s incredibly wrong. I mean, $250,000 now. What if he decides, well you know $150,000, you’re pretty rich too. Let’s go ahead and lower it again. You know it’s a slippery slope. When’s it going to stop?”
Easy, Joe: when the socialist bastards have dragged us all down to an equal level of mediocrity and futility, that’s when. And not a moment before. After all, the parasites and leeches are so much smarterer than you, you know. Time to go John Galt? I’d say so, yeah. Let’s see how well socialist Democrat tyrants can conjure jobs, money, and prosperity out of big-government thin air. They can only keep buggering us for as long as we consent to bend over for it.
(Via Malkin)
Update! And of course he’s a RACIST. As currently defined, I mean. Which definition runs like this: anyone opposed to the impending fraudulent takeover of the government by a bunch of rank socialists, and has the outrageous temerity to say so publicly, in terms unapproved of by our soon-to-be overlords.
Just so’s you know, there are NO approved-of terms. You will all be assimilated. You will all become one with the Borg.
- Entries
In case anyone was wondering where "the line" is, it's just on this side of that comment.
If you can hate the lying Marxist asshat and his politics without feeding the left's righteously indignant frothing, I'm sure we'd all appreciate it.
He earns $40,000, owes taxes and probably other debts. As indicated by experts of virtually every stripe, he gets far more tax cuts under Obama than McCain. That relieves the current financial pressure on him and puts him in a better financial state to realize his dream. The increase in the purchasing power occasioned by that tax cut means more home owners can now afford to fix their homes, translating to more work for Joe, and potentially higher salary. The company he works for now makes (according to him) $250,000 which means - if this goes to only one person - no tax increase. Even if it makes $300,000, the additional tax is $1,500! How such an additional tax will affect a business's employment decision beats me; or why Joe should kill his ambition just because the country - at a time whem Republicans have saddled us with a $10 Trillion debt and a costly unneccessary war - asks those who can afford it to pay a little more beats me!
Now, let's look at the history of tax cuts. Reagan came into office with a simmilar mantra of tax cuts and he did cut taxes. Then, he realised his folly that you don't cut taxes while embarking on ambitious military expansion (or like now, senseless Iraq war and debilitating debt), and before the end of his two terms, he raised taxes SIX TIMES! Read my lips I wont raise taxes, said Bush 1. Then when he realised the mess already caused by Reagan's tax cut (before Reagan reversed himself), he abandoned his promise and raised taxes to combat a devastated economy. Clinton came, and realising that uncontrollable budget deficit is harmful to the economy, he raised taxes somemore and balanced the budget, ushering in a period of unprecedented business expansion, wealth creation and prosperity.
Those who are brainwashed by the insidious, hate-stoking, Republican propaganda machine need to read economic history and reject these liars and self-serving hate-mongers.
Hey, wait a sec -- you're serious, aren't you?
Guess that whole "brainwashing" thing you blather about is why the scumbags on your side feel the need to utterly destroy an ordinary citizen who committed the crime against The People of merely asking a question of your communist Messiah, right? After all, the reaming Joe the Plumber is getting from your goon squad is for his own good, right? And if he wasn't "brainwashed," he'd know that. So you dimestore dictators will just have to explain it to him -- via electrodes attached to his scrotum in some dank Ogulag, if necessary.
Up your ass sideways with that left-wing horseshit. The only one who's been brainwashed is you. And I'll say it again: one of the principle differences between us and you is that if you want to live in a socialist "utopia," we don't care. Take on off; do it today. There are any number of places where you can enjoy the tyranny of mediocrity, with all the government health care, gun control, PC speech codes, and faltering economies you desire. These include most of Europe, Canada, Cuba, and plenty of others. Leave. No one from my side of the aisle will do anything harsher to you than wave bye-bye.
But no, that's not good enough for you. You insist on subjugating freedom-loving Americans to your statist ambitions, forcing us to live in the kind of mucked-up, bass-ackward society you think best. And if we dare to disagree, you'll do all you can to silence that disagreement and keep us in line. We're seeing how you people operate right now, as your beloved Messiah moves to shut down any questioning of him at all.
Well, fuck you, and him, and everybody who "thinks" like you, right in the heart. Leave. Go away. May your chains rest lightly upon you, and may history forget you were ever our countrymen. Leave liberty-minded, Constitution-respecting Americans one place in all the wide world where we can live as we choose, and pursue our dreams without your fascist-thug compatriots looking over our shoulders, vetting our very thoughts for any sign of "false consciousness," and picking our pockets.
Alternatively, you can keep right on pushing us until we finally have our backs against the wall. Then you're going to find out how badly you've miscalculated the ferocity unleashed whenever anyone, be he man or animal, gets backed into a corner. And you'll deserve what you get.
...idiot.
Myth: BUSTED!
Sure as hell affected mine, and my combined household income is considerably less than $250,000.
But you hang in there, hoss. Show up every day, work hard, save your excess, and someday you too can move on up to middle class.
Why on earth did Obama make him his official campaign artist? Obama actually sent Shepard a letter praising his career and his illegal activity, like putting Obama stickers on stop signs! So does that mean that Obama supports illegal activity that cost tax payers billions per year in city clean up? Why is the media not pointing this out? Obama refuses donations from Rezko but accepts $400,000 in donations from Obama merchandise from this thug?
Shepard Fairey has made images of the White House burning in the past and images that depict President Bush being taken down. How is that not negative for this country? Better question, why does Obama praise Shepard's career when it is been based on attacking this country and the government with visual rhetoric that is overly violent? Because he is a socialist. That is why. That is why Shepard keeps saying his work is more “positive” now. Bullocks!
Shepard Fairey's original HOPE image of Obama is not 'original'. It is based off of a poster that another artist made of Che in the 60s. Shepard Fairey is a copyright violator and petty criminal. Look up Rene Mederos and the work that Shepard stole from him. He does not give anyone credit unless he is caught, or "busted" as he puts it. The only copyright Shepard Fairey acknowledges is his own.
Obama has said great things about the arts and how he will fund art education and programs, but at what cost? His actions by hand picking Shepard Fairey to reperesent his campaign visually proves that he does not care about the rights of artists. Either that or he is too lazy to do a simple search for ’Shepard Fairey’ online in order to find out who exactly this art thief and criminal is. The fact that Obama does not answer his artist supporters about his thoughts on the oprhan works bill also shows that he does not care about the rights of artists. He cares about art, but not about the rights of those who create it! That is socialism my friends!