Another unmasking, another old-fashioned fisking
S’cuse me, did someone say antipatriotic?
In the recent political battle around the Marine recruiting station in Berkeley there has been much confusion around the concept or slogan of “supporting the troops,” but opposing the unjust wars of the Bush regime. Many who oppose the Bush regime wars also say they “support the troops.” Let me say it straight out—I do not support the troops and neither should you. It is objectively impossible to support the troops of the imperialist military forces of the U.S. and at the same time oppose the wars in which they fight.
The truth, at last. Which ought to put to bed once and for all any Lefty attempt to cloak their anti-Americanism in the fog of their dishonest, Orwellian subterfuge of “support” for our troops.
The United States has over 700 military bases or sites located in over 130 foreign countries. The hundreds of thousands of troops stationed in these countries are not there to preserve or foster freedom and democracy as the Bush regime would like to claim, but to maintain U.S. imperialist domination of the world. The United States now spends more on its military than all the other nations of the world combined.
And in none of those countries do we take an active hand in their actual governance, with the partial exception of Iraq. Which running of things is, y’know, the very damned definition of “imperialism,” along with outright theft of the resources, such as oil, that we are content to purchase at market prices instead. We’re involved in aiding with the security of those places either at their own specific request or by UN mandate, and when asked to leave, we leave — see “Philippines, The” for a little direly-needed schooling on this.
Now get busy redefining “imperialism” to suit your idiotic premise, whydon’tcha. We all know it’s coming; goalposts on wheels has long been the unscrupulous MO of collectivists like this nimrod from Milan to Minsk to Michigan, and some things never change — the predictability and vapid illogic of Lefty argumentation being foremost among ‘em.
As for military expenditures, in the first place, it’s not at all likely that anyone really knows the extent of military expenditures in closed societies like China or Russia — or, realistically, anywhere else, up to and including the US, for that matter. In the second, wouldn’t it be better to compare presumed expenditures as a percentage of GDP rather than just noting raw spending numbers?
No matter on that one, really; I’m sure he’s perfectly correct. And so friggin’ what? Is that something any truly patriotic American ought to be ashamed of? Only a soldier-hating, fearmongering Lefty could possibly be alarmed and discomfited by the very idea that America remains the strongest nation in the world, and as such relatively secure.
Come to think of it, “antipatriotic” might not be a strong enough epithet for these swine.
We need to oppose the recruitment of men and women into the military. We need to support resisters within the military who have realized what they are doing and now choose to resist the role of the U.S. military.
All good Leftists need to support sedition, mutiny, and treason. Gotcha. Just remember down the line that you said it, when some of us occasionally point that telling fact out. No more howling about anyone “questioning your patriotism” — you have none. Some of you cynical, disingenuous moonbats really ought to try to remember that it can be dangerous to try to wrap yourself in a flag you’ve already set the match to — publicly and unashamedly. A pyromaniac, after all, has no right to get upset when attention is called to just who started the conflagration in the first place.
We need to expose that those in the U.S. military are trained to be part of a “killing machine.” While not every member of the military is an individual murderer, they are all part of a system that commits war crimes, including aggressive wars, massacres, rape, and other crimes against humanity, all in the service of U.S. imperialism. The bottom line is that even if these people are relatives or friends, you can not support the troops without also supporting the objective role that these troops play in the imperialist system.
And there you have it: for America-hating Leftists like this weevil, Ideology Trumps All — even family ties and friendship. How perfectly typical of the collectivist mindset.
In 1933 Marine Major General Smedley Butler clarified the role of the U.S. military. He stated, “War is just a racket…It is conducted for the benefit of the very few at the expense of the masses…I spent 33 years and four months in active military service as a member of this country’s most agile military force, the Marine Corps…In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism…”
And right there, I think we’ve uncovered what this treasonous filthbag really opposes. Hey, how are we ever going to realize the liberal/Left utopian dream of World Socialism when the ongoing success of dirty, mean old free-market capitalism keeps undercutting our specious, dishonest arguments?
In the words of another, long-defunct socialist dictatorship: Arbeit macht frei!
And once more it’s shown beyond contradiction that all any of us has to do to discredit these unctuous totalitarian assholes is quote them accurately and tell the truth about them.


"Hundreds of thousands have died as a direct result of the U.S. invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan. Millions are either internal or external refugees. Tens of thousands have been detained in prisons, with thousands of these tortured and scores murdered. Haditha, Iraq where 24 Iraqis were massacred is just the best known of the massacres. Women and children are routinely described as “collateral damage” by military spokespersons when they are murdered in military operations."
Listen to yonder commie riff those numbers like they have actual meaning ... Hundreds of thousands... Millions ... tens of thousands ... 24. We kill them, torture, them, displace them, and then douse them with the final awful Imperialist gravy by calling them collateral damage. I can hardly sleep with myself.
And that 24? We got to be killing more efficiently than that, I mean 24 at a time it's going to take forever to hit that first hundred thou even. I'm too lazy to figure it out--although with my excellent pre-1970 public school education I can do that. But my education didn't have endless silly stories about Squiggy the Swamp-Draining Republican Toad or Rainbow Akbar the Brown Lion of Equality instead of math and geography.
Oh, so that's what I was doing in Haiti and Bosnia? And here I thought that I was helping to support/uphold the legitimate government and bring stability to the conflict-torn region. But then again, I am one of Jon Carry's dummies who got stuck in Irak, so I guess that's par for the course.
I love the quote about "the Bush regime" justifying the presence of US troops overseas. I guess before January 20, 2001, all US troops were inside US borders, which will come as a great surprise to those of us who spent more time on foreign soil under Clinton and his predecessors than we ever did under Bush II.
"Supporting the troops essentially means supporting the illegal war. It seems that us anti-war types have been doing all sorts of mental and philisophical gymnastics to try and work around this. What has emerged is a sort of low impact, mealy-mouthed common wisdom that is palatable to everyone but is ultimately going to allow us to stay in Iraq for years to come."
These guys are the worst.