Devious stratagem
Glenn links to this moderately amusing piece on an attack campaign against Our Lord and Savior, but that ain’t what grabbed me, since any election involving the Clinton smear machine is going to be rife with this sort of thing. No, what grabbed me was this:
Kerry’s note was titled “Swiftboating” — a reference to Kerry’s own presidential campaign in 2004, which was famously sunk by falsities spread by the lobbying group Swift Boat Veterans for the Truth. Many politicos believe that Kerry’s decision not to “dignify” the rumors and fight them aggressively contributed to his campaign’s defeat in the general election.
“Falsities.” Not one of which was ever actually, y’know, proven to be any such thing.
Goebbels was right, as “journalists” like this one prove every day of their parasitic existences: disseminate a lie often and adamantly enough, and it will eventually become a misshapen sort of “truth.” They’ve managed to gull the gullible with the Bush AWOL lie, the Sixteen SOTU Words lie, and now the Swiftvets lie — and that is by no means an even remotely complete list. Those are just the ones that immediately come to mind.
Left mediabots: ask yourselves why we don’t trust you. Although a far more apposite question would be: why on earth would we?





And believe me, if Obama or Clinton get in the White House, it'll be a disaster that's not been seen since Jimmy Carter. It pretty much guarantees a Republican in the White House for 8, if not 12 years after that.
But the Democrats have to win the White House first.
I looked to see if that item was from the wire services, as it smelled like AP work, but it seems to have been a bit of home-grown propaganda.
Our liberal totalitarians will never admit that "Swiftboating" means, in the hackneyed phrase, "speaking truth to power," or at any rate speaking truth to Kerry.
If it were based on actual events, it would refer to a situation in which a politician makes claims about the past and is publicly fisked by the people who share that past. But since that sort of thing really hasn't happened to anyone else but Kerry, it must follow that "swiftboating" is based on some unprovable innuendo regarding the SwiftVets rather than provable observed history. I will have to research.
willingeager accomplices in the ever-helpful MSM. And to the extent that it doesn't elicit gales of sardonic laughter so loud and plentiful as to sound hurricane sirens every time it's brought up, I'd say it's been pretty damned successful so far, more's the pity.Finally, the POWs brought it all home by pointing out how Kerry's speech was used by the NVA torturers. All Kerry needed to refute that was to have _one_ POW out of the hundreds of returnees back him up.
It didn't happen. Even the "Peace Committee" -- the handful of Garwood-type traitors who flipped while in prison, and who escaped trial for political reasons -- and the early-release collaborators didn't flock to Kerry's support. Or if they did, Kerry's media surrogates didn't write about it.
The celebrated lawsuit against Carlton Sherwood by Kerry surrogates petered out after the election -- after it had done its job, keeping the anti-Kerry film Stolen Honor off the air. The cronies couldn't stand up to discovery, so when the suit got that far, they folded their tent. But nobody ever sued the authors of Unfit to Command, despite many threats from Kerry and various Kerry footmen and coatholders.
But it's an article of faith in the press, most of whom have never met a serving soldier, that the Swifties were discredited and Kerry -- who to this day has not released his records to the public -- proven true. When the exact opposite is the case.
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html
What a goof.
"And believe me, if Obama or Clinton get in the White House, it'll be a disaster that's not been seen since Jimmy Carter. It pretty much guarantees a Republican in the White House for 8, if not 12 years after that."
In your dreams. A Democrat victory in 2008 guarantees Democrat wins forever. The Democrats will enact a whole raft of laws and changes to stack the decks in their favor. Millions of recent immigrants (legal and illegal) will be naturalized en masse, with government-funded activist groups instructing them how to vote. The laws disfranchising convicted felons will be struck down. The 2010 Census will be 'adjusted' for supposed undercounts of the urban poor, blacks, hispanics, etc, insuring that more electoral votes go to 'blue states' and more black/hispanic representatives are elected. The "fairness law" for media will be revived to shut down conservative talk radio. Bloggers will be subjected to "campaign finance" laws. Laws against vote fraud will be eviscerated. Businesses, big and small, will be punished if they donate to Republicans or fail to donate to Democrats. Labor unions will funnel billions to the Democrats. (Expect unionization by "card-check" to be enacted quickly.) Conservative activists and NGOs will be hit with IRS audits and FBI investigations.
After all that, U.S. elections will be like Mexican elections in the heyday of the PRI.
It took INCREDIBLE gall to campaign as a "war hero" after that, especially since (as, again, everyone agrees) he took 3 Purple Hearts for minor injuries and used them to get sent home early. Hard to blame those he left behind and then slandered for being angry with him.
It's also odd that "Swiftboating" is the malediction associated with falsity, as opposed to "Dan Rathering." After all, Rather's attack was clearly based on crudely forged documents, while the 255 Swift Vets forced Kerry to retract several claims, such as the Christmas in Cambodia story.
But the left still controls the MSM, so their delusions get spun into fact, as in the Wired story.
read To Set The Record Straight by one of the SBVT insiders. This book just came out and details the Vietnam veteran movement that arose against Kerry. It debunks the media myths and tells a chilling story of how far the media and the Kerry machine went to suppress the truth. I was involved in the vet effort and everything in the book I had knowledge of is presented accurately.
You can find a review here.
I've seen that book mentioned here and there, and it sounds good. Gotta see if I can't get a copy of that one myself, if ever I get my hands on a spare dime.
Sweet Jesus, but you've got a talent for understatement.
The Democrats only consented as far as it was profitable for their careers. Otherwise, they fucking loved Communism. From FDR, who referred to Stalin affectionately as "Uncle Joe" and ignored all evidence of Communist infiltration of our government, flatly blocking all efforts to end it, to today's Democrat Party controlled by socialists, the Democrat's have a long history of loving that totalitarian nonsense.
Fuck them, right in the heart.