Home > Fucking Morons, Life In The O!gulag > How’s that Hopeychange working out for you morons?

How’s that Hopeychange working out for you morons?

March 3rd, 2010

It’s certainly the change you idiots voted for, and now we’re all gonna get it — good and hard:

To meet the Obama administration’s targets for cutting greenhouse gas emissions, some researchers say, Americans may have to experience a sobering reality: gas at $7 a gallon.

To reduce carbon dioxide emissions in the transportation sector 14 percent from 2005 levels by 2020, the cost of driving must simply increase, according to a forthcoming report by researchers at Harvard’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.

The 14 percent target was set in the Environmental Protection Agency’sbudget for fiscal 2010.

Tell me the fairy tale again about how Obamachrist’s intention isn’t to destroy what little is left of the capitalist, free-market economy with his scorched-earth socialism, and replace it with a top-down, command-and-control one. That one’s my favorite.

I do admit, it’s gonna be funny as hell to see big-city Obamasuckers whining about paying seventy dollars a pound for trucked-in fresh arugula, and the food riots that will eventually ensue. But hey, they’ll be fine; liberals don’t need cheap gas, since they all ride the bus anyway.

  • Share/Bookmark
Comments appear entirely at the whim of the guy who pays the bills for this site, and may be deleted, edited, ridiculed, or otherwise pissed over as he in his capricious fancy sees fit. Thank you.
  1. teresa
    March 3rd, 2010 at 11:49 | #1
    Yes, it will be funny to see the libtards whine about the price of produce, but I fear they are too stupid to get the connection between gas prices and transporting food to them. They will also, no matter how many times you show them the tax, insist it is big oil screwing them. They are only loyal to the one who is indeed screwing them.
  2. Sigivald
    March 3rd, 2010 at 13:01 | #2
    It won't happen.

    If they try it (which might well be dubious, what with the "CO2 is a pollutant!" decision being based on the IPCC reports, which are now widely known to be exceedingly dubious as science and thus challengeable), Congress will amend the Environmental Protection Act to stop them.

    (Assuming that the EPA can mandate a tax on fuel, which I'm not sure it can.)

    It's too unpopular for Congress to allow, period. They'd all lose their precious jobs.

  3. March 3rd, 2010 at 14:15 | #3
    I'm afraid I can't be as sanguine as you are, Sig, about relying on Congress to do anything honest, Constitutionally correct, or sensible. Look what they're getting ready to do with the health-care takeover, after all. And I have yet to see any indication of the Obama Regency or its wet-brained supporters backing off of the AGW scam one iota; he still has his liberal-media propaganda apparatus covering for him on that one, and seems determined to keep right on running with it as long as he does.
  4. Mark A. Flacy
    March 3rd, 2010 at 14:21 | #4
    Yeah.

    The funny thing is that it's always a *bleeping* tax. If they want $7/gal gasoline, they could also simply mandate that the minimum price a company can charge per gallon is $7.

Comments are closed.
Nevis Hotel - Credit Card Consolidation - Credit Counseling - Nevis Hotel