Cold Fury

Harshing your mellow since 9/01

Irreversible revolution

Another great one from Codevilla.

As I explained a year ago, by 2016 the ruling class’s dysfunctions and the rest of the country’s resentment had pushed America over the threshold of a revolution; one in which the only certainty is the near impossibility of returning to the republican self-government of the previous two centuries. The 2016 election is not reversible, because it was but the first stage of a process that no one can control and the end of which no one can foresee.

Donald Trump is not and never has been the issue. With or without Trump, the nightmare of those who resist the 2016 election was, is, and will remain the voters who have chosen and will continue to choose candidates who they believe are committed to reducing the ruling class’s privileges and pretensions.

Let us be clear: the 2016 electorate chose Trump and they saw Trump as the vehicle by which to challenge the ruling class. During the first half of 2017, the Republican Party finished discrediting itself as a possible vehicle for that job. Since this is so, were Donald Trump seriously to bid for the presidency in 2020, it would have to be by leading a new party focused on the identities of anti-ruling class Americans. Carrying the Republican label would be an impossible burden.

Were an energetic, unambiguous, unapologetic Trump to affirm the majority of Americans’ political identity, not all Republicans would follow. Nor does he need them all. By bringing new elements into his following and, yes, by dropping some Republicans from it, Trump would effectively build a new party, with intact credibility. The departure of major corporations from his business council—big business is deeply unpopular on Main Street America—is an example of  how to gain by shedding baggage. At any rate, it was never possible that the entire Republican Party would represent America against the ruling class.

But by the same token, each action taken by anyone who is creating a new movement must speak for itself more loudly and clearly than the words used to explain that action. Democracy does not tolerate pairing big words with small accomplishments. Today, Trump’s role in fulfilling the political marketplace’s demand is up to him even more than it was in 2016. But now as then, America’s open political marketplace invites all. The anti ruling class constituency is bigger than ever. If Trump does not lead it, someone else will.

Precisely. As Glenn Reynolds always says: if you hate and fear Trump and end up succeeding in seeing him thwarted, just wait till you see what we send you next.

Read all of it.


1 thought on “Irreversible revolution

  1. There is an aspect of the anti-Trump idiocy that I don’t see addressed much. The Democrat voters looked like they were also going to choose somebody who could be called an ‘outsider’; Sanders. Whether either Trump OR Sanders is really an outsider in any real sense is immaterial; they branded themselves as such. The Democrat establishment didn’t like the idea of running with Sanders as the candidate, so they used Insider tricks to make sure Her Shrillness got the nomination…and then she tanked. She lost to a candidate that, before the election, the Insiders considered to be a joke. Take out the illegal votes that the Democrats insist don’t exist, but we all know do, and even her claim to have taken the popular vote is in serious question.

    So, the Democrat Insiders insisted on running and Insider candidate, and it was a disaster.

    They don’t really have any insider candidates better than Shrillary for 2020. If the rank and file insist on an ‘outsider’ candidate, and really get behind the idea, the Democrat establishment could be in real trouble.

    Keeping up the scare about Trump, about ‘Fascists’, about just about anything outside the Democrat party might – MIGHT – keep the Democrat voters in line. If it takes down Tump, so much the better. But I really think all the thrashing about stems from a deep seated fear of the Democrat establishment that the voters might insist that since they screwed the pooch in 2016, a different power structure in the party is in order for 2020.

    The Democrat/Liberal/Progressive/Intellectual/Socialist clique fears that its position isn’t secure anymore. Not because of Trump – they’ve weathered populist Republican Presidents before – but because there are real indications that their tame voters aren’t as tame as they should be….and just might be getting as sick of the Democrat power structure as the rest of us are.

Comments are closed.



"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." – Claire Wolfe, 101 Things to Do 'Til the Revolution

Subscribe to CF!
Support options


If you enjoy the site, please consider donating:

Click HERE for great deals on ammo! Using this link helps support CF by getting me credits for ammo too.

Image swiped from The Last Refuge

2016 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards


RSS - entries - Entries
RSS - entries - Comments


mike at this URL dot com

All e-mails assumed to be legitimate fodder for publication, scorn, ridicule, or other public mockery unless otherwise specified

Boycott the New York Times -- Read the Real News at Larwyn's Linx

All original content © Mike Hendrix