You didn’t think for a moment they had any intention of trying to bring them down any, did you?
Shell Oil Company has announced it must scrap efforts to drill for oil this summer in the Arctic Ocean off the northern coast of Alaska. The decision comes following a ruling by the EPA’s Environmental Appeals Board to withhold critical air permits. The move has angered some in Congress and triggered a flurry of legislation aimed at stripping the EPA of its oil drilling oversight.
Shell has spent five years and nearly $4 billion dollars on plans to explore for oil in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas. The leases alone cost $2.2 billion. Shell Vice President Pete Slaiby says obtaining similar air permits for a drilling operation in the Gulf of Mexico would take about 45 days. He’s especially frustrated over the appeal board’s suggestion that the Arctic drill would somehow be hazardous for the people who live in the area. “We think the issues were really not major,” Slaiby said, “and clearly not impactful for the communities we work in.”
The closest village to where Shell proposed to drill is Kaktovik, Alaska. It is one of the most remote places in the United States. According to the latest census, the population is 245 and nearly all of the residents are Alaska natives. The village, which is 1 square mile, sits right along the shores of the Beaufort Sea, 70 miles away from the proposed off-shore drill site.
The EPA’s appeals board ruled that Shell had not taken into consideration emissions from an ice-breaking vessel when calculating overall greenhouse gas emissions from the project. Environmental groups were thrilled by the ruling.
“What the modeling showed was in communities like Kaktovik, Shell’s drilling would increase air pollution levels close to air quality standards,” said Eric Grafe, Earthjustice’s lead attorney on the case. Earthjustice was joined by Center for Biological Diversity and the Alaska Wilderness League in challenging the air permits.
At stake is an estimated 27 billion barrels of oil. That’s how much the U. S. Geological Survey believes is in the U.S. portion of the Arctic Ocean. For perspective, that represents two and a half times more oil than has flowed down the Trans Alaska pipeline throughout its 30-year history. That pipeline is getting dangerously low on oil. At 660,000 barrels a day, it’s carrying only one-third its capacity.
Production on the North Slope of Alaska is declining at a rate of about 7 percent a year. If the volume gets much lower, pipeline officials say they will have to shut it down. Alaska officials are blasting the Environmental Protection Agency.
“It’s driving investment and production overseas,” said Alaska’s DNR Commissioner Dan Sullivan. “That doesn’t help the United States in any way, shape or form.”The EPA did not return repeated calls and e-mails.
Why would they? They owe the serfs they rule with an iron fist no explanations, and no apologies. In a tyranny such as this one, czars, minions, and toadies are accountable to no one but the King.
Credit where due update! Via Glenn, a GREAT idea. Exercise your freedom to express your disgust with this malignant idiot and his despotic bureaucracy while you still can, folks.



2 comments
JC says:
4/25/2011 at 8:55 PM (UTC -5)
That is to say that Shell got officially fucked as a matter of policy. They paid for the rights to explore and develop those fields from the sovereign power, which then revoked those rights.
So, does Shell get a refund? If it were BP there would be no question, but Royal Dutch Shell - must be monarchists and not heavy campaign contributers.
miami harold says:
4/26/2011 at 12:53 PM (UTC -5)
Are the taxes we pay at the gas pump for each gallon of gasoline that we buy levied as a "percentage" of the product price or a flat "x" cents per gallon. (There is really an x, y, and probably z of taxes from federal, state, and local government).
If it is a percentage, the government has a vested interest in keeping the price high as long as the quantity sold doesn't fall below a certain level.
If the levying governments wanted to ease some of the pain of the high price, they could reduce or eliminate the taxes. Yeah, right..... that will be a cold day in hell. I suspect the amount charged in taxes exceeds the profit margin of the retailer, wholesaler, and refinery put together. But nobody talks about the greedy government.