Third Time\u2019s a Charm For Merrick Garland<\/strong><\/a> Of course he would’ve. As I’ve said till I’m blue in the face, the Swamp will hound and persecute Trump until they can finally get him behind bars, the better to close out the books on him by Epsteining the poor schlub shortly thereafter.<\/p>\n Sure, this will be the\u00a0third<\/i>\u00a0special counsel assigned to harass Donald Trump, the most investigated American president in history. It would be nice if Garland could lure Robert Mueller out from his\u00a0Golden Pond<\/a>\u00a0activities to take on the attack against the once and possibly future president once more. I suspect, though, that Mueller is too deep in Bidenesque (or Fettermanesque) mental twilight to mount that steed again. Maybe Garland can harness up the despicable Andrew Weissmann, Mueller\u2019s brain and primary dogsbody in the now thoroughly discredited \u201cRussian collusion\u201d delusion.<\/p>\n The predicates for the new special counsel are not too promising. One has to do with Trump\u2019s actions on January 6, 2021, when some of his supporters, along with\u00a0lots<\/i>\u00a0of FBI plants masquerading as Trump supporters, marched on the U.S. Capitol. The other has to do with what classified documents Trump may have sequestered at his Mar-a-Lago estate after leaving the presidency.<\/p>\n The first is unpromising because, notwithstanding the exertions of loopy Liz Cheney to demonstrate his culpability for the January 6 jamboree, Trump had nothing to do with the almost entirely peaceful Capitol breach. His\u00a0last two tweets\u00a0<\/a>that day (just a day or two before he got thrown off the platform) cannot have pleased the future CNN or MSNBC hostess Cheney:<\/p>\n I am asking for everyone at the U.S. Capitol to remain peaceful. No violence! Remember, WE are the Party of Law & Order\u2014respect the Law and our great men and women in Blue. Thank you!<\/em><\/p>\n Please support our Capitol Police and Law Enforcement. They are truly on the side of our Country. Stay peaceful!<\/em><\/p>\n Not much to work with there, Liz, but as a\u00a0famous Russian<\/a>\u00a0once said, \u201cShow me the man and I will find you the crime.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n “Unpromising,” Kimball says, as if AG Lavrentiy Garland cared one whit about what’s true and what is demonstrably not<\/em>. As if the “American” “Justice” Dept had anything whatever to do with anything even remotely resembling<\/em> justice. As if the FUSA still had any kind of “rule of law” in place to check such evil skullduggery. I have to believe that, deep down, Kimball knows all this.<\/p>\n We do know, however, that when it comes to government harassment, \u201cthe process is the punishment.\u201d The state has unlimited resources with which to torment people it doesn\u2019t like, and on that list of people it doesn\u2019t like, Donald J. Trump gets star billing.<\/p>\n It has long been clear that America now operates under a two-tier judicial system. Notice that I did not say a \u201ctwo-tier system of justice.\u201d Absent the virtue of impartiality, there is no justice. There is a flagrant absence of impartiality in the contemporary American judiciary. How else could Joe Biden, who obviously profited from his family\u2019s foreign connections in China, Ukraine, and elsewhere, go uninvestigated? How else could Hunter Biden escape\u00a0any<\/i>\u00a0serious scrutiny? You can add Hillary Clinton and a large cast of Democratic apparatchiks from the FBI and our intelligence services to that list.<\/p>\n But let\u2019s say you were wandering around the grounds of the Capitol on January 6, 2021: Pow! you are caught up in a nationwide dragnet and tossed into a Washington gulag for many months before you are treated to a biased trial. If you are Steve Bannon and you refuse a congressional subpoena, you are indicted, convicted, and given jail time. If you are Eric Holder, Barack Obama\u2019s \u201cwingman\u201d and attorney general, exactly\u00a0nothing happens to you<\/a>.<\/p>\n The establishment hates Donald Trump for many good reasons. He did a lot to wreck their concessions during his first term and, should he again win the presidency, the gloves would be off and their gravy train would be over.<\/p>\n I suspect that Michael Anton is right:\u00a0They can\u2019t let him back in<\/a>\u00a0because Trump\u2019s attack on the regulatory \u201cdeep state\u201d with all its globalist affiliations would bring their elitist party to an abrupt end. \u201cThe people who really run the United States of America,\u201d Anton wrote, \u201chave made it clear that they can\u2019t, and won\u2019t, if they can help it, allow Donald Trump to be president again.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n He most certainly will NOT be. And even if Trump somehow miraculously manages to slip by them as in 2016, he will be stymied exactly as he was the first time out. By many of the very same people who put the arm on back then, actually.<\/p>\n There IS a bright side to all this, however, even if it won’t be a lot of help to one Donald John Trump in the interim: martyring him could well prove to be the proverbial spark that sets off a long-smoldering powderkeg of righteous rage and retribution at long, long last, leading to a potential grassroots uprising that would make the phonus-balonus J6 FBInsurrection look like the debutante’s cotillion it so truly was. In which case, scoundrels like Garland and the rest of the Swamp rats might finally get what’s coming to them, and Justice will finally be visited upon them.<\/p>\n Update!<\/span> As should come as no surprise to anyone familiar with his reliably brilliant work, I couldn’t resist a look at the Mike Anton piece linked above by Kimball, which had somehow gotten by me when it first appeared back in July<\/a>.<\/p>\n Love him or hate him, during Trump\u2019s presidency, the economy was strong, markets were up, inflation was under control, gas prices were low, illegal border crossings were down, crime was lower, trade deals were renegotiated, ISIS was defeated, NATO allies were stepping up, and China was stepping back (a little). Deny all that if you want to. The point here is that something like 100 million Americans believe it, strongly, and are bewildered and angered by elite hatred for the man they think delivered it.<\/p>\n Nor was Trump\u2019s record all that radical\u2014much less so than that of Joe Biden, who is using\u00a0school-lunch funding<\/a>\u00a0to push gender ideology on poor kids, to cite but one example. Trump\u2019s core agenda\u2014border protection, trade balance, foreign restraint\u2014was quite moderate, both intrinsically and in comparison to past Republican\u00a0and<\/em>\u00a0Democratic precedent. And that\u2019s before we even get to the fact that Trump neglected much of his own agenda in favor of the old Chamber of Commerce, fusionist, Reaganite, Conservatism, Inc., agenda. Corporate tax cuts, deregulation, and bombing Syria: These are all things Trump\u2019s base doesn\u2019t want, but the oligarchs desperately do, which Trump gave them. And still they try to destroy him.<\/p>\n Again, why? I think it\u2019s because, while Trump\u2019s core MAGA agenda is decidedly not outside the historic bipartisan mainstream, it is well outside the present regime\u2019s core interests. Our rulers\u2019 wealth and power rise with open borders, trade giveaways, and endless war. Trump, at least in principle, and often in practice, threatens all three. The old America\u2014the one in which Republicans cared about the heartland and weren\u2019t solely valets to corporate power, Democrats were pro-worker and anti-war, and Bill Clinton and The<\/em>\u00a0New York Times<\/em> could advocate border security\u2014is in the process of being replaced, if it hasn\u2019t already been, by one in which there is only one acceptable opinion on not just these, but all other issues.<\/p>\n Anti-Trump hysteria is in the final analysis not about Trump. The regime can\u2019t allow Trump to be president not because of who he is (although that grates), but because of who his followers are. That class\u2014Angelo Codevilla\u2019s \u201ccountry class<\/a>\u201d\u2014must not be allowed representation by candidates who might implement their preferences, which also, and above all, must not be allowed. The rubes have no legitimate standing to affect the outcome of any political process, because of who they are, but mostly because of what they want.<\/p>\n Complaints about the nature of Trump are just proxies for objections to the nature of his base. It doesn\u2019t help stabilize our already twitchy situation that those who bleat the loudest about democracy are also audibly and visibly determined to deny a real choice to half the country. \u201cNo matter how you vote, you will not get X\u201d\u2014whether X is a candidate or a policy\u2014is guaranteed to increase discontent with the present regime.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Yep, Anton is bang on point yet again. From there, he rolls up his sleeves to delve right into the real nitty-gritty of the whole shebang, and as usual, it’s a wonder to behold.<\/p>\n
\nWould Merrick Garland have wheeled out the old special counsel wheeze absent Trump\u2019s announcement that he was running for president again?<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n![](\"https:\/\/coldfury.com\/wp\/wp-content\/plugins\/remoji\/data\/emoji\/1f44d.svg\")
3<\/span><\/div>