Still think so, do ya? Better think again, bub.
It is sometimes impossible to believe that we are just under two months removed from the attempted assassination of Donald Trump — a former President and the Republican nominee to become the President again this year — and we have almost no meaningful information about the incident.
What is not at all impossible to believe is that the media has completely memory-holed the assassination attempt. They simply do not talk about it. Why not? Because discussion of that historic event could help Trump in the election. The media, in their TDS-induced stupor, simply cannot have that.
Fortunately for America, there are still brave people within the Secret Service (not you, Ronald Rowe) who have come forward to shed light on the massive security cock-up on July 13. Thanks to Senator Josh Hawley sharing the testimony of those whistleblowers, we have learned more about the attempt on Trump’s life that we never would have otherwise known.
Last night, Hawley had some shocking new whistleblower testimony that he shared with Jesse Watters on Fox News. It is not hyperbole to say that you are not going to believe what you are about to hear in these four minutes:
Follows, a Twatter video embed, then…
Holy sh*t. Let’s go through the list of what we learned here:
- A local police countersniper — from the ground, not from an elevated position — neutralized the shooter, NOT the Secret Service (though they did fire the shots that killed him);
- Acting USSS Director Rowe lied about this in his recent Congressional testimony;
- Many of the agents assigned to the protective detail on July 13 were not from the Secret Service, but from Homeland Security, which has no experience in protecting a President;
- Those DHS agents were pulled off of their other jobs, like child endangerment investigations, for this posting;
- The DHS agents had NO training other than a single webinar;
- And finally, the webinar didn’t even work for some parts of its two-hour duration.
W … T … A … F!
Is the Secret Service being run by The Three Stooges? Or is that too much of a compliment?
The Secret Service is doing exactly what it’s told, as is the DoJ, FBI, CIA, and all the other appendages of the lumbering Überstadt megalodon. The Twitchy author engages in a smattering of fretful woe-is-we-ing over the prospective reinforcement of “conspiracy theories” and such-like folderol deriving from these shocking—SHOCKING!!!— revelations, as one would expect. But for my money there can be but one conclusion that fits the known facts available to sensible, observant people, to wit:
Each Day that Passes it becomes more
evident that this is an Inside JobNever Forget the attempt on
President Trump’s life
July 13 2024We the People want Accountability 🤛
— Cyndexia America Truther 💯🥂 (@TrutherAmerica)
Eventually, inevitably, poor old Good Time Charlie swallows hard, smooths his hair, squares his weary shoulders, takes a deep, steadying breath, and vaults into the fray with the usual hallucinatory cope.
Are you really going to vote for more of this?
Vote Responsibly! https://t.co/Kfs7W6et2X
— Dave Lalande (@davelalande)
Aw yeah, THAT’ll fix this thing for sure and certain. And if somehow it doesn’t, why, there’s always the next “election,” and the next, and the next, and the next, and the one after that! Each and every last one of them the most critically vitally crucially vitally IMPORTANT© “election” in our lifetimes, quite possibly EVARRR, you betcher!!!
*Le sigh* Pathetic. Pointless. Soporific. And perhaps most of all: embarrassing.
NOTE: Posted this ‘un with MarsEdit, gang. It’s working, it’s working! Sincerest thanks to Mike M of HM/EntirelyDigital for his capable assistance.
Also, my bog-standard sarcastic derogation of the “elections” will o’ the wisp is aimed squarely at US national elections, which I still maintain are pure theatre, nothing more nor less. Local and state contests are a whole ‘nother kettle of fish in my view, or a great many of them at any rate. YMMV.
1
1
- Entries
It is insulting to The Three Stooges. They would have done a much better job, and probably crushed the guy with a piano.
OF COURSE this was an inside job. That much was apparent starting 5 minutes after it happened.
And the FBI riding cover-up wingman for the Secret Stupids is also visible from space, even to Stevie Wonder.
Call me when the judicially-sanctioned waterboardings of all involved commences, followed by the capital trials for conspiracy, murder and treason. Otherwise, don’t trouble me further about this. Everyone alive can recognize when the officials are the assassins, it just troubles them to admit the obvious conclusion.
TPTB at DoJ and DHS, top to bottom, are murderers. The state of PA should begin prosecutions of the lot under state law, beyond the protection of federal pardons. Then the rats will jump ship and start singing in earnest.
“OF COURSE this was an inside job.”
Ditto, and it ain’t even close to questionable.
“From a prior post earlier this year:
When people ask why the Russians don’t rise up, throw out their corrupt, dictatorial regime (including Putin and his oligarchs), they need look no farther than into a mirror, because the same sort of tyranny – including mass jailing of political prisoners whose Constitutional rights were and still are being ignored – was enacted here without significant resistance or protest, and for which now no accountability has been imposed (at the very least) and no actions under the criminal laws (which for this abuse of powers should be the norm) have been enacted or even demanded.
Right now, the US remains a turnkey dictatorship: “Understand that if active duty military actually get deployed within the United States, that weapon is not just going to be pointed at other people, other countries, it’s pointed at you. … If you do not get in your house when I tell you to,” Bronson warned, “you become the enemy. Martial law. You know, when your rights get curtailed?” — SSGT Cindy Bronson, US Army
And every law enforcement agency has the duty to protect and serve the government which pays for it – and that duty does not extend, nor has it ever extended, towards the governed.” https://streamfortyseven.substack.com/p/q-who-will-win-the-2024-elections
“…and that duty does not extend, nor has it ever extended, towards the governed.”
Every actual oath to serve in a police force has held the person to the standard of upholding the constitution of the state and of the United States. That is extending the duty to serve and protect the governed. They may ignore it, in fact they do, but they are common criminals in that case.
In general, see https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2592&context=vlr – this is a rather long law review article of case law, which is how courts interpret the Constitution – and in real life, absent specific statutes, this is what the law is. Most people are shocked by this – even attorneys – but if you read the cases, it’s pretty obvious. Police can choose to run away from a riot, like in Minneapolis, and burned-out business owners who sue for negligence will have their cases dismissed and be left with no legal recourse against a government which failed to protect them.
“The US Supreme Court has made it clear that law enforcement agencies are not required to provide protection to the citizens who are forced to pay the police for their “services.” In the cases DeShaney vs. Winnebago and Town of Castle Rock vs. Gonzales, the supreme court has ruled that police agencies are not obligated to provide protection of citizens. In other words, police are well within their rights to pick and choose when to intervene to protect the lives and property of others — even when a threat is apparent. In both of these court cases, clear and repeated threats were made against the safety of children — but government agencies chose to take no action.
A consideration of these facts does not necessarily lead us to the conclusion that law enforcement agencies are somehow on the hook for every violent act committed by private citizens. This reality does belie the often-made claim, however, that police agencies deserve the tax money and obedience of local citizens because the agencies “keep us safe.” Nevertheless, we are told there is an agreement here — a “social contract” — between government agencies and the taxpayers and citizens. And, by the very nature of being a contract, we are meant to believe this is a two-way street. The taxpayers are required to submit to a government monopoly on force, and to pay these agencies taxes. In return, these government agents will provide services. In the case of police agencies, these services are summed up by the phrase “to protect and serve” — a motto that has in recent decades been adopted by numerous police agencies.
But what happens when those police agencies don’t protect and serve? That is, what happens when one party in this alleged social contract doesn’t keep up its end of the bargain. The answer is: very little. The taxpayers will still have to pay their taxes and submit to police agencies as lawful authority. If the agencies or individual agents are forced to pay as a result of lawsuits, it’s the taxpayers who will pay for that too. Oh sure, the senior leadership positions may change, but the enormous agency budgets will remain, the government agents themselves will continue to collect generous salaries and pensions, and no government will surrender its monopoly on the use of force.” https://mises.org/power-market/police-have-no-duty-protect-you-federal-court-affirms-yet-again
OK, no disagreement. My comment was poorly worded as I understand the police not only do not have any requirement to protect, when they do provide protection it is protecting the criminals rather than the law abiding.
My point was intended to be about the constitution which they swear an oath to uphold, and that in that upholding they are serving the public. Of course, as I stated, they fail at that as well.
The laws of gravity have not been suspended, even though law enforcement or the military may pretend otherwise.
There is always a reckoning.