It’s beginning to look that way, yeah.
The nudist ex-lover of the man who attacked Paul Pelosi is a pedophile who attempted to kidnap a 14-year-old boy and allegedly bought sex dolls for her sons to use.
Oxane ‘Gypsy’ Taub, 53, the former lover of David DePape who is charged with attacking Pelosi in his San Francisco home, was convicted in 2021 for child abuse.
Prosecutors said Taub, who once protested naked in front of San Francisco City Hall, had been stalking the boy, sending him emails and messages and trying to lure him to secretly meet with her.
Following his attack on Pelosi, DePape has been accused by his daughter of sexually assaulting his three children when they were kids.
Y’all may remember Paul Pelosi’s arrest a few months back for nearly killing a girl while driving drunk—on which charges this rich-boy child of extreme privilege skated without doing a single day in jail, after not even bothering to show up in court for his “sentencing”—but I bet you didn’t know this carefully-excised part of the story:
It’s been a rumor for years in SF that Paul Pelosi is gay. David Depape is said to be a Castro Nudist. “The lunatic who allegedly assaulted Paul Pelosi is a Berkeley resident and a ‘Former Castro Nudist Protester’ and hemp ‘jewelry maker’ …sounds totally MAGA Republican to me. 🤣🤣” this from Twitter.
When Paul Pelosi was busted for drunk driving accident earlier in the year, he had a young man with him, and that too was covered up by the police and the press.
Bold mine, and every bit as hinky as the rest of this loony-bin shit-circus is. EXPLAINER: this “Castro Nudist” thing is basically a small group of gay male prostitutes with a penchant for parading around the streets of SF wearing nothing but maybe a cock-ring, not that there’s anything wrong with that.
So okay, yeah, obviously all of the reprobates in the Pelosi Skull Cracking cast of characters are not merely ordinary, everyday weirdos, but are truly, deeply depraved. Back to the revelations from DePape’s nekkid former lover.
SAN FRANCISCO (KGO) — The former partner of the man accused of violently attacking Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband at their San Francisco home on Friday is revealing new details about the suspect.
“Hello this is Gypsy Taub. I am the ex-life partner of David DePape and the mother of his children,” said Oxane Taub, calling from the Californian Institution For Women in Corona, California.
“He is mentally ill. He has been mentally ill for a long time,” said Taub, who last year was found guilty on 20 counts, including the attempted abduction of a 14-year-old boy near his Berkeley high school.
She described a time DePape returned home after disappearing for a year.
“He came back in very bad shape. He thought he was Jesus. He was constantly paranoid, thinking people were after him,” Taub said. “And it took a good year or two to get back to, you know, being halfway normal.”
Tara Campbell: “Did he ever show any aggression towards politicians, were his political beliefs extreme in your opinion?”
Taub: “Well when I met him, he was only 20 years old, and he didn’t have any experience in politics, and he was very much in alignment with my views and I’ve always been very progressive. I absolutely admire Nancy Pelosi.”
Uh oh; there goes the Usual Suspects’ hastily cobbled-together narrative, that DePape was a violent Rightwing Extremist MAGA Nazi, looks like.
3
3
- Entries
Hmmm, wonder what the surveillance videos show? Oh, rumor is that the Pelosi folks won’t release them. Hmmm.
We can expect those right after the Jan 6 video’s…
Can we send a request to Mr Putin and ask if he would include Berkeley, San Fran, and the Napa wine area in his eventual nuke threat on DC? It would save so much time and effort of us survivors to eliminate the perversion?
🙂
And to answer the headline question:
YES
But you knew that.
This should be the pilot
The BETTER question:
Is EVERYBODY in San Francisco a sicko degenerate?
And you know the answer to that question!
A mentally ill person is calling him mentally ill. Do these combine like adding negatives, meaning he’s really bad, or like multiplying negatives, meaning he’s probably ok?
I’m going with addition…
Never forget that maths be rasicts!
🙂
https://youtu.be/Lvl5Gan69Wo
I wouldn’t bother watching your little u tube video. Provide the GM stockholder list that shows Shanghai Motors as an owner of GM stock in that amount of 1/3 or it’s a lie. It’s public information, asshole.
I gave you that opportunity, and then I put up the links showing the majority owners of GM, starting with Blackstock, and who owns Blackstock.
You keep lying and now try to enlist the aid of other liars. it’s what every marxist does.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) estimates a total collective dose of 600,000 person-Sieverts over 50 years from Chernobyl fallout (IAEA Bulletin, Vol.38, No.1, 1996). A standard risk estimate from the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) is 0.05 fatal cancers per Sievert. Multiply those figures and we get an estimated 30,000 fatal cancers.
Now let’s recall that, according to the BEIR report, the LNT model may overstate risks or understate them by a factor of two. Thus the estimated death toll ranges from something less than 30,000 and up to 60,000.
A number of studies apply that basic methodology — based on collective radiation doses and risk estimates — and come up with results varying from 9,000 to 93,000 deaths.
That 10-fold difference seems significant, but it is easily enough explained by the differing approaches and assumptions used in the various studies. For example, whether they consider radiation exposure across Europe or just in the most heavily contaminated countries of Eastern Europe.
And of course that 10-fold difference is peanuts compared with the many orders of magnitude separating Monbiot’s 43 and Caldicott’s 985,000.
To briefly note some of the most important studies:
Reports by the UN Chernobyl Forum and the World Health Organisation in 2005-06 estimated up to 4000 eventual deaths among the higher-exposed Chernobyl populations and an additional 5000 deaths among populations exposed to lower doses in Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine.
A study by Cardis et al. reported in the International Journal of Cancer estimates 16,000 deaths.
British radiation scientists Dr Ian Fairlie and Dr David Sumner estimate 30,000 to 60,000 deaths.
A 2006 report, commissioned by Greenpeace and involving 52 scientists, estimates a death toll of about 93,000.
And there you have it, just as I have said. “Jaybo” is just another marxist liar, now using Greenpeace, the UN, and the WHO as his source.
There is an easy way out of mistakes, you just tell the truth. Liars just keep lying.