They won’t stop.
It’s Inevitable: Trump Will Be Indicted
Americans should prepare for the spectacle of Donald Trump pleading not guilty to charges brought by the Biden Justice Department.It now appears inevitable that the Justice Department will bring criminal charges against the former president. FBI Director Christopher Wray’s stunt at Mar-a-Lago on August 8 is part of creating the optical illusion that Donald Trump is guilty of any number of crimes related to January 6 or the mishandling of secret government documents—or both. On Monday, the Justice Department subpoenaed another Trump White House lawyer as the legal momentum accelerates.
As evidence mounts that Trump supporters cannot get a fair trial in Washington—surveys of prospective jurors conducted by defense counsel show a heavy bias against January 6 protesters—D.C. District Court judges have denied each change of venue motion. Coverage of the January 6 select committee hearings undoubtedly has amplified that bias, especially for high-profile defendants such as members of the Oath Keepers. The committee has focused on the roles of both the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys, airing videos of their conduct that day and attempting to tie these alleged militias to Donald Trump.
A week after a former member of the Oath Keepers testified before a televised hearing in July, defense attorneys representing the Oath Keepers filed another motion to delay the trial and move it out of D.C. “The main point we have to consider is that you have a congressional committee that goes out and paints the Oath Keepers as white supremacists,” one defense attorney explained to Judge Amit Mehta, another Obama appointee.
Ahh, there’s another of those hunnert-and-ten-percent all-American names again, like I mentioned the other night.
Mehta rejected the argument and took umbrage at another attorney’s suggestion the committee’s work was political. “This is not a forum to express your political views or your views about the motivations of the committee,” Mehta scolded. “I don’t think they’re hosting the hearings just to interrupt this trial.”
He denied the motion; the first Oath Keepers trial begins next month. It’s possible the Justice Department will charge Trump for conspiracy for allegedly working with the “militias” to attack the Capitol.
This is the legal and judicial circle of hell now fired up to come for President Trump—a vengeful Justice Department run by Obama loyalists working with a weaponized FBI to bring criminal charges against hundreds of Trump supporters who then face the wrath of enraged judges of both political parties. There is no way out.
And at this point, there’s no way out for
MerrickLavrentiy (FIFYA—M) Garland, either. Democrats have raised expectations that Trump soon will be in handcuffs; failure to do so will result in a harsh backlash by their own voters this fall. After six years of promises, Democrats better deliver the goods on Trump or face intra-party revolt.Americans should prepare for the inevitable—the unprecedented sight of a former president pleading not guilty to crimes he is alleged to have committed by a Justice Department run by his successor and potential rival in the next presidential election.
Fair enough, I suppose, as long as the filthy, fascist Do(In)J is fully awake themselves to the need to prepare for an appropriately, umm, kinetic response when they fit Trump for the shiny chrome bracelets.
Of course, Jules is right, although by pulling up short at “indicted,” she didn’t take the thought quite as far as she should have. At this point, can anybody still seriously imagine that Trump is NOT headed directly to prison, via any stratagem, pretext, or ruse the federal juggernaut can gin up for the purpose? In the immortal words of good ol’ Mike Ness:
The man who was one half of “The Lovers,” as President Trump called them, disgraced FBI investigator Peter Strzok, Mr. Russia Collusion hoax extraordinaire himself, has implored America to trust the FBI on the Mar-a-Lago raid.
Please clap.
Strzok appeared on MSNBC’s Morning Joe program to argue in support of the integrity of the FBI because they really mean it this time.
Host Joe Scarborough caused a spit-take when he said in passing that “we never believed” the Steele Dossier “from the start.” But the dossier turd was polished by Scarborough’s own guest and Strzok’s on-the-side honey, FBI Attorney Lisa Page. Joe’s bloviation continued and he eventually got to a question, sort of, with the pronouncement, “the FBI makes mistakes, the church makes mistakes, people make mistakes. Should this be any reason for Americans not trust what the FBI and DOJ are doing now in pursuit of protecting classified documents? [sic]”
Sit down, because you’re not going to believe what Strzok said. “Well, yes, Joe, absolutely the American public should trust what the FBI’s doing.” He continued, conflating the “Midyear Exam” — Hillary Clinton’s email scandal — with “Crossfire Hurricane” — the fake Russia Collusion scam — and the raid on President Donald Trump’s home. “You know, I think back on the year and a half I spent with the team looking at Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server. There was no concern, there was no outrage on behalf of any Republican.” Which brings to mind a question: Why would any Republican be upset about the investigation into the chardonnay-swilling Secretary of State keeping a non-government server on which she did sensitive government business at home? For all the world’s sophisticated spy agencies to read secret State Department files — and, of course, Hillary’s Yoga poses and Chelsea’s wedding plans? In that case, Republicans asked for an investigation, not an invasion.
“We used search warrants and conducted a very invasive investigation…It’s not that the FBI is targeting any one side or the other.” Scarborough sat stone-faced as Strzok went on, “What you see is the FBI going out on a day-in and day-out basis, objectively investigating allegations of law.” Joe never followed up with a query about the FBI raiding Hillary’s Chappaqua manse, which didn’t happen.
“Trust us,” is it? Die in a fucking fire, Government-man. The very fact that you still walk the Earth a free man is a shame and a disgrace, one which befouls the very concept of decency and honor.
1
- Entries
wpDiscuz
A message gets sent tonight. Wyoming is but a microcosm of the US.
It’s rare that I want to move time forward, but gee I wish the next couple of hours would get here 🙂
And with 4% of the vote in, Decision Desk HQ has called the winner, and isn’t Witch Cheney.
Eat shit Dick, and please take your pos daughter hunting tomorrow.
Old fashioned stomping of the witch. 58% of the vote in and the witch is getting beat 2:1
80% in Cheney under 30%. Curb stomped.
Americans are sending a message tonight.
And remember this is WITH vote count inflation from dummycrats crossing over to vote for her.
Even if that only helped by 5% (and it was likely a good bit more) this was a total curb-stomping.
Good riddance to bad rubbish.
I think had every marxist in the state of Wyoming voted for the bitch she still would have been stomped.
Not this isn’t good news, but Cheney is a small cog in the Machine.
Certainly we need to beat back about 200 Cheneys, so it’s a good start.
But the idea that they arrest Trump before the midterms is a bigger worry.
Well, the bitch is one of those leading the arrest bandwagon, so seeing her gone, the face of the Jan 6 fake trial, is a good thing.
The Department of Justice and FBI are now not at all related to justice, but are instead like the NKVD – a political arm.
One suspects that the DoJ might conduct a recount of the vote, and miraculously “FIND” enough additional votes for Cheney to put her over the top. Even if the vote total then exceeds the total population of Wyoming!
IRS is looking for Brownshirts
The FBI is the SS. The “new” IRS will be the globohomo SA.
Not SS. Instead, KGB!
It’s blindingly obvious that yes they want ANY excuse they can find to monkey with and/or preferably outright prevent the vote in November. An actual insurrection (as opposed to that joke they call one) or a civil war would give them that. It’s not a good idea to give them the excuse.
I have no idea how successful they will be, but there are a lot of groups out there trying hard to prevent new fraud. Will they succeed enough to prevent what would be — at least to anyone with two functional brain cells — obviously fraudulent results? Only time will tell.
“It’s not a good idea to give them the excuse.”
You cannot be serious, at this point in history.
1) The reasons for doing so are not merely multiple, they are legion.
2) You think they won’t make up their own excuse, or bootstrap something else entirely to serve in its stead?
3) What’s coming is a foregone conclusion, even now. The only question under consideration is the final tally.
“If you strike at the king, don’t miss.“
“You cannot be serious, at this point in history.”
I’m going to guess that what is meant, is not some small group action that is destined to fail but provide an excuse, needed or not.
There comes a point when certain things are obvious and the solution also obvious. That point is not the same for everyone. Early action is counter productive.
As I wrote elsewhere, this is my gut feeling as well.