Home > Drill now! > Dare to (not) drill

Dare to (not) drill

July 18th, 2008

David Harsanyi on Envirocrat energy obstructionism:

Don’t worry, though, congressional Democrats have a bold plan. Hold on for 10 or 15 years and they’ll have a bounty of energy options. They promise. But no oil shale. No clean coal. No nuclear power. And definitely no more oil.

They will not enable your revolting, inefficient lifestyle. In the short-term, offshore drilling, especially, is a pie-in-the-sky fairy tale. Unlike, say, pond scum and hydrogen fuel packs.

On the bright side, it seems that reality is beginning to overtake fantasy. This week, Newt Gingrich’s American Solutions for Winning the Future group delivered 1.3 million signatures to Congress, demanding that Washington allow more drilling. A recent Zogby International polls shows 74 percent of likely voters support offshore drilling in U.S. coastal waters, and 59 percent favor drilling for oil in the tundra of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

There are few issues in America that offer this kind of impressive “unity.” But apparently when unity doesn’t align with left-wing orthodoxy, we need more “leadership” to explain why we’re wrong.

But of course. They’re smarterer than us, see.

(Via Malkin)

Update! Dianne Feinstein: eat cake, prole losers!

There is no quick fix to $4.50-a-gallon gas, no way to provide instant relief to consumers we know are hurting. Yet President Bush and others continue to push the false promise of offshore oil drilling.

Just this week, the president lifted the executive order banning drilling that George H.W. Bush put in place in 1990. And he’s asked Congress to lift its own moratorium on oil exploration on the outer continental shelf — which includes coastal waters as close as three miles from shore.

This would be a terrible mistake. It would put our nation’s precious coastlines in jeopardy and wouldn’t begin to fix the underlying energy-supply problem. And it surely wouldn’t ease gas prices any time in the near future.

Uh-huh. So what does this lying liberal weasel think will do the trick?

We need to forge a long-term energy strategy that takes these factors into account, moves our nation away from fossil fuels and invests in renewable energy resources. We need to promote conservation and develop clean technologies and clean fuels — like cellulosic ethanol. We need to continue to raise fuel economy standards for vehicles and improve the energy efficiency of our buildings by 50%.

It’s also time to crack down on excessive speculation in critical energy markets. In May, Congress took a first step by closing the “Enron loophole,” which brought more energy trading under federal oversight. Congress now needs to eliminate other loopholes and to get serious with large institutional investors who are trading energy futures with no speculation limits.

Give up on oil, idly fantasize about decades-off new technologies and alternative fuels, mandate higher fuel-efficiency standards beyond any realistic expectation of attainment, and — above all — punish the evil capitalists by any and all means at the federal G’s disposal — the Democrat “solution” to damned near everything.

Which has been proved by recent events not to work. Which has never produced one drop of oil, never lowered gas prices, and never will. Which is an unyieldingly reactionary prescription for more of the same do-nothingism that is directly responsible for the untenable situation we now find ourselves in. But hey, Democrat “solutions” certainly do get results, of a particular sort:




Shorter Feinstein: NO, WE CAN’T! These Dem idiots deserve proper thanks for all they’re doing to save us from ourselves, and for their slavish devotion to their environut masters.

Tar. Feathers. Rails. Torches.

Updated update! Via Glenn, alternate-energy ruminations from…Steven Den Beste!

The problems facing “alternate energy” are fundamental, deep, and are show-stoppers. They are not things that will be surmounted by one lone incremental improvement in one small area, announced breathlessly by a startup which is trying to drum up funding.

The way you can tell that a fan of “alternate energy” is a religious cultist is to ask them this question: If your preferred alternate source of energy is practical, why isn’t it already in use?

Why not? Because of The Conspiracy™. The big oil companies don’t want it to happen, and have been suppressing all this live-saving green people’s energy all this time for their own nefarious purposes.

As soon as you hear any reference to The Conspiracy™, you know you’re talking to someone who is living in a morality play.

Y’know, I do miss the ol’ USS Clueless. Nice to see Steven revisiting this topic.

  • Share/Bookmark
Comments appear entirely at the whim of the guy who pays the bills for this site, and may be deleted, edited, ridiculed, or otherwise pissed over as he in his capricious fancy sees fit. Thank you.
  1. Martin
    July 18th, 2008 at 11:02 | #1
    DiFi said:

    This would be a terrible mistake. It would put our nation’s precious coastlines in jeopardy and wouldn’t begin to fix the underlying energy-supply problem. And it surely wouldn’t ease gas prices any time in the near future.

    Mike, dude, you've got to learn to read between the lines.

    I think what DiFi is really saying is that if they allowed drilling off shore, then gas prices would drop.

    And then you redneck rubes from Nebraskansaw or some other Gaia-forsaken hillbilly hellhole flyover country pig farm could actually afford to drive your rusty Model-A pickup (with granny's rocker tied to the chicken coop on the roof) to the coastline, where the sight of your pasty fat lard butts and mullet hairstyles, and the sound of your twangy country music would grossly offend the tender sensibilities of our patrician class.

    So, you see, she really does care about keeping our coastlines beautiful, by keeping you slack-jawed red-state troglodytes from getting anywhere near them.

  2. teqjack
    July 18th, 2008 at 12:39 | #2
    BHO was a bit more explicit a few days ago when he claimed starting to drill now would take ten years to start pumping more oil so there would be no immediate effect, but he had an answer: if he became president, he would put more money into research in the hope® that technology would change® enough that alternatives could be practical enough (on a mass scale) to start building them in nine years - and presumably be on-line in a mere seven additional years.

    Not only starting with a false premise (admittedly some enviro groups would have to be made to prove their arguments rather than force every else to prove theirs) since a new well takes about fifteen months (not counting some already in place, but capped off because of enviro court challenges, which could start producing in three months), but not noticing (OK, actually expecting noone else to notice) his "immediate" fix will take decades longer to take effect...

  3. July 18th, 2008 at 18:31 | #3
    This is the time to replace any elected official that will not vote to drill offshore, in ANWR or develop shale oil fields in the western US.

    Liberal environmentalists such as Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Diane Feinstein, Barbara Boxer, John Murtha, Ted Kennedy, Richard Durbin, Chuck Schurmer, and any Liberals must be defeated and denied a seat on Congress. No Senator or Representative must be allowed to put his/her own interests ahead of the interests of the American public!

    When they say, "Use the 68 million acres that are already leased out to gain oil," the answer is, 'Sure, just as soon as you stop catering to Environmentalist Lobbies that try to block production by naming each and every find as a danger to 'pristine areas."

    Get these bums out of Congress...NOW!

  4. July 22nd, 2008 at 20:37 | #4
    This reliance on stuff that doesn't exist-and may not for years to come- reminds me of a term from my computer programming days: vaporware. I swear to God that I want to slap people awake when I hear this kind of crap. I deal with power generation and the reality is that the electricity fairy does not come and wave her magic wand to make the lights in your house turn on.
Comments are closed.