Home > The Loony Left > Confused, much?

Confused, much?

April 12th, 2007

Well, of course Don Imus is a conservative now. I mean, racists can’t be liberal, and liberals can’t be racist. Right?

As noted racist liberal T-Bagg says: whatever.

(Via Insty)

Update! Snoop explains about dem nappy-headed ho’s, yo. It’d be funny, if it all weren’t completely, idiotically pathetic.

Updated update! Glenn finds the silver lining.

  • Share/Bookmark
Comments appear entirely at the whim of the guy who pays the bills for this site, and may be deleted, edited, ridiculed, or otherwise pissed over as he in his capricious fancy sees fit. Thank you.
  1. three legged bunny
    April 12th, 2007 at 14:46 | #1
    You should be worried that via Imus' stupidity Al fucking Sharpton has become the arbiter of right and wrong on the airwaves.

    Known mainly as a noisy hustler, Sharpton can't even get into the same area code with the truth, or anybody's best interests but his own.

    But Imus went to Al and took a knee in surrender. It did nothing for his case at all, he's still boned massively. King Al did not deign to grant yonder jock a boon. So, boned and humiliated, Imus stands alone. But as a final insult, inadvertent or not, Imus' genuflection managed to raise the architect of the Tawana Brawley hoax up a notch on whatever scale is used to measure these things.

  2. April 12th, 2007 at 16:26 | #2
    S'truth. It continually amazes me to see how, after repeated demonstrations, some people just refuse to learn the lesson that appeasement never works -- in any context. Imus should've said "fuck you, it was a joke," and let the race-baiters seethe themselves blue in the face.
  3. April 12th, 2007 at 18:44 | #3
    It's interesting how CBS, under pressure from Sharpton, et al, moved so quickly to fire Imus. On the other hand, ABC execs turn a deaf ear to Rosie every time she goes into one of her rants. Anybody remember the "ching, chang, chong" chant?
  4. April 12th, 2007 at 19:33 | #4
    Apologizing to Sharpton for race issues is like apologizing to John Dillinger for writing bad checks. It's like apologizing to a Kennedy for driving drunk. It's like apologizing to Bubba for pawing the hired help. It's like...well, you get it.

    Al Sharpton should have been charged with manslaughter for the people he got killed in his race riots. Sadly, the DA was mau-mau-ed. At least Imus never got anybody killed, unlike the oh so "Reverend" Krist-Al-nacht Sharpton, the only "civil rights" leader to conduct his own pogroms.

    I'm with J-Pod: "a rampantly infectious venereal disease that masquerades as a man".

    And I'm really, really with this guy:

    "I don’t listen or watch Imus’ show regularly. Has he at any point glorified selling crack cocaine to black women? Has he celebrated black men shooting each other randomly? Has he suggested in any way that it’s cool to be a baby-daddy rather than a husband and a parent? Does he tell his listeners that they’re suckers for pursuing education and that they’re selling out their race if they do?

    When Imus does any of that, call me and I’ll get upset. Until then, he is what he is — a washed-up shock jock who is very easy to ignore when you’re not looking to be made a victim.

    No. We all know where the real battleground is. We know that the gangsta rappers and their followers in the athletic world have far bigger platforms to negatively define us than some old white man with a bad radio show. There’s no money and lots of danger in that battle, so Jesse and Al are going to sit it out."

  5. three legged bunny
    April 12th, 2007 at 23:22 | #5
    Noel, you can connect Sharpton to innocent deaths more directly than riots--two people he smeared committed suicide during the Tawana Brawley Hoax. (I love to write that, I think it ought to be the mandatory explainer every time his name is mentioned in a story: "Al Sharpton, chief lying ballbag of the Tawana Brawley Hoax said today....") Al and his odious duo of henchmen character-assassinated everybody white so violently that two people took their own lives. And since there was no crime, no assault, no nothing but a process-headed glutton lipping off, figure it out for yourself. He has never been held accountable for anything he said or did during that time including massively obstructing an investigation.

    He had to obstruct, of course. Even the most plodding police interview would have disclosed that no crime happened, and hence, there was nobody to blame and the pretty TV lights would go away. Al could not have that. Al needs pretty TV lights.

  6. April 13th, 2007 at 07:58 | #6
    CBS and the BBC partners in cowardice
  7. Mikes Mom In Law
    April 13th, 2007 at 11:02 | #7
    Firing Don Imus for doing what's he done for 30 years is one of the most hypocritical things ever. I'm an old 60's style NY liberal feminist (sorry, Mike ; ) who's listened to him all that time, was thrilled when the show went on MSNBC so I could watch from various hotels as I travel on business. Can't say his sidekicks haven't made me wince on occasion, but he is actually intelligent and really funny. Rare.

    This is one of the worst "politically correct" pieces of crap Ive seen. No more is more demeaning to black women than their own rappers. So, all you people who wanted Imus fired, clean up your own backyard, as Elvis sang. Why didn't you 'fire' Sharpton for Tawana Brawley? Jesse Jackson for calling NYC Hymietown? You support lowlife rappers by paying for their CDs that spew far worse on the air. Won't even mention Howard Stern, who is foul and generally not funny.

    May Sirius get on the ball here.

    NOTE from Mike: this comment was sent to me via e-mail; I registered and posted it for her myself, and the registration form doesn't allow apostrophes in usernames. So, just in case anyone might've thought my mother-in-law didn't know the proper spelling of her own username, well, think again, chump -- I assure you she's smarter than any of us. ;)

Comments are closed.