Home > Where Do We Go from Here? > How’s that taste to ya?

How’s that taste to ya?

November 12th, 2006

Steyn rubs our noses in it:

The enemy aren’t a bunch of simpleton Pushtun yakherds, but relatively sophisticated at least in their understanding of us. We’re all infidels, but not all infidels crack the same way. If they’d done a Spain — blown up a bunch of subway cars in New York or vaporized the Empire State Building — they’d have re-awoken the primal anger of September 2001. With another mound of corpses piled sky-high, the electorate would have stampeded into the Republican column and demanded the U.S. fly somewhere and bomb someone.

The jihad crowd know that. So instead they employed a craftier strategy. Their view of America is roughly that of the British historian Niall Ferguson — that the Great Satan is the first superpower with ADHD. They reasoned that if you could subject Americans to the drip-drip-drip of remorseless water torture in the deserts of Mesopotamia — a couple of deaths here, a market bombing there, cars burning, smoke over the city on the evening news, day after day after day, and ratcheted up a notch or two for the weeks before the election — you could grind down enough of the electorate and persuade them to vote like Spaniards, without even realizing it. And it worked. You can rationalize what happened on Tuesday in the context of previous sixth-year elections — 1986, 1958, 1938, yada yada — but that’s not how it was seen around the world, either in the chancelleries of Europe, where they’re dancing conga lines, or in the caves of the Hindu Kush, where they would also be dancing conga lines if Mullah Omar hadn’t made it a beheading offense. And, as if to confirm that Tuesday wasn’t merely 1986 or 1938, the president responded to the results by firing the Cabinet officer most closely identified with the prosecution of the war and replacing him with a man associated with James Baker, Brent Scowcroft and the other “stability” fetishists of the unreal realpolitik crowd.

Whether or not Rumsfeld should have been tossed overboard long ago, he certainly shouldn’t have been tossed on Wednesday morning. For one thing, it’s a startlingly brazen confirmation of the politicization of the war, and a particularly unworthy one: It’s difficult to conceive of any more public diminution of a noble cause than to make its leadership contingent on Lincoln Chafee’s Senate seat. The president’s firing of Rumsfeld was small and graceless.

Still, we are all Spaniards now.

So it would seem.

Update! Here, have another bite:

“These Colors Don’t Run” is a fine T-shirt slogan, but in reality these colors have spent 40 years running from the jungles of Southeast Asia, the helicopters in the Persian desert, the streets of Mogadishu. … To add the sands of Mesopotamia to the list will be an act of weakness from which America will never recover.

Yum, yum! Choke it down, folks — that righteous, burning anger it stokes is all we have left to fight with.

  • Share/Bookmark
Comments appear entirely at the whim of the guy who pays the bills for this site, and may be deleted, edited, ridiculed, or otherwise pissed over as he in his capricious fancy sees fit. Thank you.
  1. Scott
    November 13th, 2006 at 12:47 | #1
    With respect, Steyn credits AQ Inc with more cunning than they actually have; the reason it changed from "KABOOM" to "drip-drip-drip" is because we got more serious about catching and stopping terrorists; so ironically it was the national security party's relative success at redressing the failures of 9/11 that set it up for a good chunk of its drubbing last week.

    People don't have the attention span for a true occupation - haven't since soldiering became a volunteer job and which was eclipsed by better paying ones in the private sector.

    The real problem with Iraq is that Bush won't (can't) admit that the closest model to an effective Iraq occupation looks more like Japan or West Germany than the neighborhood renovation plan a lot of the contemporary armchair generals and basic morons of today are hoping for, and until Bush fesses up to that, Iraq war critics are going to continue pretending that there could have been an effective occupation run on a specific timetable.

    And I hate to admit this but a large number of the morons I refer to above are otherwise staunch conservatives; as with the Foley mess at least half the damage was self-inflicted.

    People need to wake the f-k up and learn to think.

Comments are closed.