Home > General > What a Tangled Webb…

What a Tangled Webb…

October 26th, 2006

Hey, look on the bright side of these revelations that Jim Webb (D-Nowhere) wrote some pretty weird sex scenes into his novels, including some homosexual pederastic behavior and some locker room talk that is really, really misogynistic… Oh, who am I kidding. There’s no bright side to it. I don’t care if it helps Allen, it’s kind of gross to even be made aware of this stuff; some of it has nearly the same recoil value as the Foley IM’s.

The inevitable, straight up partisan defenses (‘it’s just sex’ and ‘this invasion of Mr. Webb’s privacy is indecent…’) will necessarily ignore the fact that Webb put this stuff out there in novels, which were apparently published if not always widely read. (Fields of Fire was in fact widely read, and I have a copy of it on a bookshelf about three feet from where I am sitting). Not all the stuff Drudge gets excited about is really filthy, some of it is just good ol’ fashioned fictionalized sex, and I think it’s prudish and stupid to get worked up about a lot of the stuff that Drudge has printed. Yeah, some of it reads a little misogynistic, but you know, so do a lot of 20 year old military guys, and that’s who Webb frequently writes about.

Some of Webb’s fictionalization is pretty grotesque, however, and I think it’s fair to ask, (1) How the hell did you ever come up with that stuff, Jimbo?, and, (2) What ever possessed you to put it down on paper, sell it to the public, then after that to go into politics again and expect you wouldn’t get it thrown in your face? It’s true, Allen is lame for attacking Webb based on fictional works that Webb wrote… but then Webb is pretty lame for publishing some of that stuff and then apparently expecting a free pass when he ran for office. Now don’t go below the fold unless you want some grossout material.

The lowlight? This passage cited by Drudge:

– Lost Soldiers: “A shirtless man walked toward them along a mud pathway. His muscles were young and hard, but his face was devastated with wrinkles. His eyes were so red that they appeared to be burned by fire. A naked boy ran happily toward him from a little plot of dirt. The man grabbed his young son in his arms, turned him upside down, and put the boy’s penis in his mouth.”

Bantam Books, NY, 1st Edition, 2001, (hard cover), page 333.
Quote is from para. 10,.Chap. 34.

Whoa. Ick.

(Please forgive my breathlessly hysterical commentary, which is the kind of hateful, vicious, ranting gay bashing you’d expect from one of us socially conservative Republican Party kool-aid drinkers).

The horse race metaphor fails in the Virginia senate race. It is more like a demolition derby between a couple jackasses that ride the short horse trailer, rather than a horse race.

I don’t often say I’m grateful to live in Maryland but I will tonight. I despise Ben Cardin’s politics, but I’m not ashamed of his behavior and think at heart he is a reasonably decent and honorable man. I like Michael Steele’s politics, and likewise, am not ashamed of his behavior and believe he is similarly decent. Neither one seems likely to embarass Maryland voters. Virginia voters can’t say the same about Allen and Webb, whose campaigns have bounced from embarassment to embarassment the way a basketball bounces from hand to floor and back again, and with about the same frequency. Were there an encyclopedia section on “having to hold your nose to vote,” a photo of these two would suffice in place of actual words.

[

Update

: A front page Kossack says that Webb must respond by saying he witnessed this stuff in the "hellhole of Vietnam." Hey, that's a pretty good idea. You think it's true? I mean, were I writing the post, I'd say "if he saw this stuff in VietNam, then he should say..." and so on. I'm not sure I'd come out and just say, "It's true and he needs to tell us that." Ahh, nevermind. Doesn't matter. He just needs to say it's true. That'll work just fine for the Kossacks. If he says it's true often enough, that will make it true. Hey, maybe later we can Googlebomb George Allen so searches on his name turn up a gay porn site...]

  • Share/Bookmark
Comments appear entirely at the whim of the guy who pays the bills for this site, and may be deleted, edited, ridiculed, or otherwise pissed over as he in his capricious fancy sees fit. Thank you.
  1. dervin
    October 27th, 2006 at 02:59 | #1
    So what you are saying, that a party who gladly takes the endorsement of a convicted racist, several wife/girlfriend beaters, a half-dozen peodphiles and their enablers are more moral than a guy who writes naughty words.
  2. October 27th, 2006 at 06:46 | #2
    a party who gladly takes the endorsement of a convicted racist, several wife/girlfriend beaters, a half-dozen peodphiles and their enablers

    Which party are you referring to? Seems like it could be either one.

  3. Veeshir
    October 27th, 2006 at 07:18 | #3
    I'm just curious who's the convicted racist? I mean, can you be convicted for that?
    If so, when do the Revs Al and Jesse go on trial?

    I used to really like Piers Anthony. I was a little creeped out by the sexual overtones in his Xanth novels, they were directed toward younger readers after all, but then I read Firefly. I never bought another book by him again. He has a graphic, very graphic, sex scene with a 6 year old girl and an older man.

    The race in VA has nothing to do with policy anymore, but it appeared the Dems started it with the stupid allegations about Allen being a racist that even the Wash Post has stopped pushing as they're just ridiculous. Like the guy who claimed Allen gave him the nickname "Wizard" because he had the same name as a KKKer. The only problem? The guy's other teammates say that he had the nickname before Allen met him and he got it because he was a wizard of a receiver.

    I was waiting for the memos from the 70s, written by Allen, in Word 97, proving, PROVING!!!!!, that he's a racist.

    They called down the thunder, well now they've got it.

    I am depressed that this race has absolutely nothing to do with policy, but that might be inevitable as the Dems refuse to say what their policies would be. Except for raising taxes, impeachment and hearings, hearings, hearings.

  4. October 27th, 2006 at 09:39 | #4
    Dervin is a liberal, V. So no, you can't be convicted of being a racist....yet. But he's doing all he can, fighting hard for CHANGE.
  5. October 27th, 2006 at 12:02 | #5
    I've only briefly looked at the passages myself, but there seems to be enough narrative distance that not much of a case can be made for whether or not Webb gets off on this stuff...
  6. October 27th, 2006 at 18:05 | #6
    Are you talking about the Kennedy's, Dervin? They're Democrats.
Comments are closed.