Home > The Loony Left > More Lefty love & tolerance

More Lefty love & tolerance

July 10th, 2006

A small handful of people, not at all representative of the so-called “mainstream”? As Allah says, it’d be nice to think so, but…I don’t. And neither does the Commissar.

Update! Jeff’s site is back up, at least until another free-speech lovin’ Lefty kills it temporarily again:

Frisch is a liar. She should have let this go. And those sites who are repeating her libels should probably reconsider and issue corrections. Because up until now, I haven’t really been pissed. But that’s beginning to change.

Maybe that’s what it’s going to take to be rid of the liars and their mindless-drone followers. Maybe the way to nullify these Lefty zombies is to get good and righteously pissed at their dishonesty and manipulation, and take whatever action that anger warrants. Maybe it really is going to come down to violence against these people in the end.

It’s going to be a sad day for our country when it happens. But it’s damned obvious where the blame for this needs to be laid. And with every next rabid attack from the Left for the “hate crime” of daring to disagree with them, followed by another sniveling, cowardly, and melodramatic claim to truthiness-speaking martyrdom, it becomes more so.

Updated update! Another roundup of hateful lunacy, along with an uncharacteristic smattering of reasoned decency, at Confederate Yankee’s joint.

Updated update! Looks like poor Amanda Marcotte*, in model hysteric-moral-cripple Lefty fashion, has difficulty seeing the difference between a somewhat rueful observation and a directly and unequivocally expressed wish to see a two year old physically harmed or even killed.

She also demonstrates once more the Lefty inability to address the actual point with anything less blunt than a cudgel, but I suppose after the examples we’ve seen set the last few days of the Left’s subtlety, sophistication, and nuance, no one should be particularly surprised by that.

*Misspelled before — sorry ’bout that

  • Share/Bookmark
Comments appear entirely at the whim of the guy who pays the bills for this site, and may be deleted, edited, ridiculed, or otherwise pissed over as he in his capricious fancy sees fit. Thank you.
  1. logic_man
    July 10th, 2006 at 16:53 | #1
    Why do we have to respond to threats of violence with threats of violence? Maybe we should all turn down the talk of actually assaulting each other.
  2. July 10th, 2006 at 16:56 | #2
    "Why do we have to respond to threats of violence with threats of violence?"

    Because some people do not understand any other language but force. Before slinging around the accusations, spend sometime briefing yourself on this issue, and you will find that Ms. Frisch precipitated matters and her supporters upped the ante considerably.

    The threats of force you hear here are responses.

  3. July 10th, 2006 at 17:03 | #3
    Actually, there have been no threats of violence here, or at least none that I'm aware of. Noting that a thing might be coming in the future -- with regret -- is hardly the same thing as advocating it. It's just this type of conflation of one occurence or moral conundrum with another unrelated or otherwise not really comparable one that is the essential flaw in so much of what passes for Left/liberal thought. Every slope is slippery, every drizzle a flood, every minor setback a catastrophe, every disagreement a war.
  4. logic_man
    July 10th, 2006 at 17:07 | #4
    MikeyNTH, surely you can see how two wrongs don't make a right, though, yeah? They say "hurt kids," we come back by slamming them hard verbally, which we did. And it worked. But saying we should hurt her or other lefties physically isn't the answer, really. It's just more violence.

    Mike, I guess you could read your post that way but saying "Maybe it really is going to come down to violence against these people in the end" can sure be taken as a call to arms, IMHO. I'm just saying...

  5. July 10th, 2006 at 17:12 | #5
    Nah, I really didn't mean it that way at all. Maybe I just put it badly -- a not infrequent problem around here. ;)
  6. logic_man
    July 10th, 2006 at 17:17 | #6
    Cool, thanks for the clarification, Mike.

    Do you really think this woman was talking for most 'bats? Is that why you think it'll come down to that? Most of the leftists I encounter are overly chilled out, if anything. Hardly the "attack someone's kid" type. You know what I mean, with all the anti-war stuff, etc...

  7. July 10th, 2006 at 20:34 | #7
    I've thought about it a lot, logic, and though it does indeed pain me to say so, I have to say that I'm more pessimistic about our chances of avoiding widespread civil strife over the next ten or twelve years than I've ever been in my life -- and I was alive during the 60s and early 70s. Worse, I'm slowly coming to the conclusion that some sort of semi-cataclysmic struggle between collectivist/progressivists and more strictly Constitutionalist Americans might not only be inevitable but necessary, if this country is going to avoid walking the disastrous road to nowhere that Old Europe is now well along on.

    The Left is well on its way to making the defense of this nation against vicious and implacable enemies a practical impossibility. The Right isn't going to stand for that institutionalization of supine weakness. And as the Left goes further and more irretrievably around the bend of sanity and reason, I begin to wonder...well, about a lot of things. And that's about as close to an endorsement of violence as I ever hope to come -- which is still a hell of a lot closer than I'd like to be. This tide can still be turned, and I hope it will be, but I'm damned if I'll countenance knuckling under to terrorists of any stripe (and that's exactly what the vermin sabotaging Jeff's site are, albeit on a more trivial level than those we usually reserve the term for) for even one moment.

  8. James Felix
    July 10th, 2006 at 22:04 | #8
    Worse, I’m slowly coming to the conclusion that some sort of semi-cataclysmic struggle between collectivist/progressivists and more strictly Constitutionalist Americans might not only be inevitable but necessary...

    As depressing a thought as that is Mike, I take some comfort in this:

    I come from a cop family, did a stretch in the military and target shoot for recreation. Although it's certainly possible that there are some left-wing cops, soldiers and private gun owners out there, I've certainly never met one. Have you?

    So any such conflict would probably boil down to disciplined professionals fighting disorganized, grabastic pieces of shit with improvised weapons. Sort of like the violence at a WTO summit writ large.

    Destructive and tragic, yes, but ultimately we Men of the West would stomp the assorted orcs and goblins into oblivion.

  9. July 11th, 2006 at 07:02 | #9
    Who ever said I was advocating hurting her, logicman? Have I, in any of my postings or comments ever advocated assaulting anyone or proclaimed a wish that anyone was dead? (The Zarqawi's of this world don't count.) Since when was I advocating assaults? The only threats of force you've heard here have been statements that force will be met by force.

    Aggression has to be met in the only language it understands - force. That is the way of this world. And if you don't think threats and aggression have been used, again, I invite you to peruse the history of this incident.

  10. July 11th, 2006 at 09:43 | #10
    "Destructive and tragic, yes, but ultimately we Men of the West would stomp the assorted orcs and goblins into oblivion."

    That pretty well sums it up, James. I don't eagerly anticipate it, I don't advocate it -- neither do I quake with fear over the prospect. If the Left keeps pushing for a real fight, sooner or later they're going to get one. And I'm quite clear in my own mind about who'll start it...and who'll finish it.

  11. joss
    July 11th, 2006 at 10:32 | #11
    Do any of you guys see a correlation between "red/blue states" fighting in congress and the entire slave/free state fighting in congress that led up to the civil war?

    I do fear it's inevitable that violence will come out of this. I do take comfort in what James said, though. . . at least we have all the guns.

Comments are closed.