The usual sewage, from the usual places
This, friends, is one of the professional voices of the self-righteous left. Writing under her own name. On a public forum. Where she freely announced and publicized her credentials and CV. And even posted a bit of her poetry.
Y’know, as much stupid, warrantless, and generally futile crap as we’ve seen Jeff have flung (flang? flinged? uhhhh, tossed? ahem) at him from various mouthbreathers, this just might take the cake. Click on over and grooooove on that Lefty peace, love, and understanding, baby.
Ain’t a thing funny about it, I assure you.
Update! The clearly psychotic Lefty (yeah, I know, I repeat myself) “apologizes” — by putting on the traditional liberal victim’s hair shirt (worn by not-really-contrite liberals who have overstepped the bounds of human decency but still wish to be thought of as morally superior, sort of the converse of the phrase’s usual meaning), and offering up some nasty insinuations about the integrity of the man she so viciously attacked. Pathetic, and very nearly unbelievable…or would be, if it was anything at all atypical of these deranged moonbats. And I almost forgot to mention that you can’t access the link to PW above because of an ongoing DoS attack that’s had his site down for two days now. Gee, wonder if those famously open-minded, tolerant Lefties had anything to do with it…
Updated update! Guess I ought to toss in a link to the moonbat’s vomitous spew — wherein she actually threatens Jeff’s 2 year old child, with perfectly typical Lefty “courage” and strength of character — so you can see for yourselves. Malkin has a small sampling of it, and I do mean small; read it and recoil in disgust from the face of today’s Left, in all its brigandish putrescence. For some reason, Patterico finds the liberal closing of ranks behind their deranged kindred shocking:
Amazing. Liberal commenters on her blog are refusing to condemn her. You might think you’d see comments like this:
I am a leftist and disagree with Goldstein, but threatening a two-year-old child with violence is beyond despicable.
Instead, you have people clapping her on the back, like Liberal Avenger, who (with no hard evidence) concludes that she must be mentally ill, encourages her to unresign and talk to a mental health professional, and says:Ignore the hypocritical wingnuts here who pretend as if what you did was some enormous crime against decency. It wasn’t.
There you have it. The face of the unhinged left, as clear as glass. According to Liberal Avenger, it is not an enormous crime against decency to threaten to shoot an innocent two-year-old child because you dislike his father’s politics.
Well, sure. These people are demented fanatics; politics is their religion, and disagreement with their rigid beliefs is to be treated as any other heresy has ever been by the community of the faithful. As Kos might say, they’re all about winning, and anything they have to do to keep their delusions safe and undisturbed is easily justified, up to and including threatening the children of E-ville™ Republicans. Expect more from them if you like, but you’re always going to wind up surprised and disappointed when you do.
Update to the updated update! When losers attack: The Left-liberal hatefest continues. Well, it’s not like it’s ever going to stop, y’know. It’s what they are, it’s what they do, it’s how they justify their very existence.
Updates, forsooth! When psychopathic, violence-fantasy-prone wimps rationalize: Doubt what I just said about the whining, snivelling self-justification from these frustrated sore losers being self-perpetuating and never-ceasing? Think again, Jack.





Rude, but then those who watch their power rapidly escaping from them like the tide through a sieve, rarely pay attention to these little politenesses.
The Tolerant Left: Goin' Down Hard, and Aimin' For the Day Care Center.
Like, There's No Reason Those Little Tykes Should Be Alive And Happy.
The fact that Robert McClelland commented supporting her says more than I can say. By your friends and enemies you are known. Really.
And then they would get indignant if they were retaliated to in kind. You know, classic bully-boy behavior.
Seriously, correct me if I'm wrong but I can't remember hearing anyone to my political left willing to call our enemies "sub-human" or advocating no holds barred violence against them.
You cut the heads off of prisoners and target civilains? They'll insist you get full Constitutional protection. We must keep the moral high ground, after all.
You disagree with them on policy? Whole different story. For that they're willing to rape and murder your baby.
Cowards. Utter cowards, every last one of them.
..and it makes it difficult to find any "threats" made against her, which was her "justification" for making comments about an uninvolved two year-old.
I was following the threads she was posting in and didn't note any threats made against her. Insults, comments (which proved true, alas) about her sanity, and so on. Oh wait, I forgot: people disagreed with her and that's like a physical threat to members of the Left.
Ohh Boy.
I read her comments on a few threads. This wasn't a "I lost my temper - sorry about that" event, this was going on in a few comment threads. She has been going around in other places trying to josh her way into getting back-up (see Ace of Spades).
What is really telling are all of the people on the left-wing sites who are backing her up and apologizing for her. Jeralyn Merrit at TalkLeft called her actions wrong. The comment thread there was full of people saying, "yeah, that was bad, BUT you know what Jeff G says about..."
Man a-live, this is one of the most character-revealing things to happen in the whole Wonderful World O' Blogs in some time. Where people have decided to place themselves in this fight that doesn't personally involve them in any way at all says a hell of a lot about them. If you find yourself supporting someone who comes strafing in from out of the ether insulting a blogger, then when getting some flak for that threatens that blogger's child, then you really ought to step back and start pondering your values real carefully. And if the answer to "Did I actually give a 'yeah, but' in support of a person who wished death on a two-year-old child?" is "Yes" then you defintiely need help. Lots and lots of spiritual guidance, if not psychological assistance.
Again, what positions people take on this whole incident will tell us all more about the character of themselves and their sites than any poll will ever do.
And I am sitting back and watching with great interest as the bloggers and the commenters are self-sorting themselves.
I just don't have the time or energy for this kind of stupid bullshit any more.