Home > General > Oh. Ouch. That Hurts… Stop…

Oh. Ouch. That Hurts… Stop…

February 17th, 2006

Well, the police reports on the Cheney hunting accident are in. The victim insists nobody was drinking. That means… Lawrence O’Donnell, who insisted Cheney must be drunk because Republicans drink, you know, is an idiot.

Don’t take it from me. Take it from Cathy Seipp.

CAVEAT: Don’t go there unless you want to see a serious rhetorical ass-whuppin’. It’s really just sort of personal, mindless abuse. Very funny, personal, mindless abuse. Quite good, really… but still just mindless abuse. Consider it my gift to you, a cherry on top of the sherbert of the Senate adding some bits to FISA to make sure that the “NSA FISA scandal domestic spying program” is covered and permissible under FISA. It seems that the more the senators know, the less they really want to put a stop to this program. What is it they’ve found out in the last week of closed door briefings? I don’t know, but if a politician has something to capitalize on, he or she will do so, without question. That many of our Senatorial solons have gotten off their high horse in the last week, tells you something. What it is, I’m not sure – other than the Kossacks lose, again.

Once again, Chimperor Shrubitler wins, his enemies flee the battlefield in headlong retreat, screaming that they aren’t retreating, they’re just attacking in another direction…

  • Share/Bookmark
Comments appear entirely at the whim of the guy who pays the bills for this site, and may be deleted, edited, ridiculed, or otherwise pissed over as he in his capricious fancy sees fit. Thank you.
  1. Mikey (Not the Host)
    February 17th, 2006 at 09:02 | #1
    The story truly wasn't about the accident. The story was about the story of the accident. (Do I get my Mr. Obvious Award now?)

    The big boys of the press ended up getting scooped by a small paper, which is mortifying to highly developed egos. What was also mortifying was the blast of reality they received. The administration does not consider it important to inform them or suck up to them. They could stand being hated by the administration - heck it seems most of them work to get the title of "person the government fears/hates". What they can't stand is being treated with indifference.

    It isn't containment. It isn't detente. They're being ignored, and like any prissy prima donna, they will not be ignored, attention must be paid to me me me! or they will throw the hissy fit to end all hissy fits.

    And so the hissy fit was thrown. And so they reaped the reaction any adult gets when he acts like a two year old. Utter contempt.

    Enjoy fellas. You earned it.

  2. Al Maviva
    February 17th, 2006 at 09:47 | #2
    Mikey NTH, Why didn't you tell me this sooner? Why didn't you say this?

    No, you had a duty to the American People, and to the readers of this blog, to tell us this sooner. Why did you delay?

    It's not that the media was angry about this, that is the problem. It's that you didn't tell us about it sooner.

    Frankly, I'm experiencing a real loss of faith in you as a blog commenter, as a result of your withholding this information. As usual, it's not the story about the coverup of the non-coverup that is the story, rather it's the story about the non-coverup of the coverup story about the coverup of the non-coverup that gets you into trouble.

    Ooops, pardon me for making that squelching noise. It was the sound of several meta-narratives imploding at once.

    ;-D

  3. February 17th, 2006 at 10:45 | #3
    God, but it must suck to be a liberal nowadays.
  4. Mikey (Not The Host)
    February 17th, 2006 at 10:56 | #4
    Sorry, Al. I was busy, um...doing something that...um...

    Look! A three-headed man on a donkey!

    (MikeyNTH turns and dashes out of the room).

  5. Sean Bannion
    February 17th, 2006 at 12:26 | #5
    Attacking in another direction worked for Chesty Puller, why wouldn't it work for libs?

    Ummmm...wait, don't answer that question. Sun Tzu would turn over in his grave.

  6. Al Maviva
    February 17th, 2006 at 12:48 | #6
    I dunno Sean. Maybe because Chesty Puller wasn't at heart a big fat pussy?
  7. Mikey (Not the Host)
    February 17th, 2006 at 13:13 | #7
    Sean, I don't think it mattered what direction Chesty was attacking in. "We're surrounded! They can't get away now!"

    Anyway, I would worry less about Sun Tzu rolling in his grave and worry more about Chesty rearing up out of his and getting you.

  8. Sean Bannion
    February 17th, 2006 at 14:16 | #8
    Good point, Al.

    See? I'm always forgetting the little details like that.

  9. Mikey (Not the Host)
    February 17th, 2006 at 19:49 | #9
    An historical tidbit. In 1934 Chester Nimitz was captain of the heavy cruiser USS Augusta on the China Station. A marine fell asleep on watch and was brought up before the captain. As usual, Nimitz asked his commander if he had anything to say. Lieutenant Lewis Puller said, "I certainly do, Captain. Get rid of the son of a bitch. He's not a marine if he goes to sleep on watch. I never want to see him again."

    The marine was then court-martialed.
    Lt.Puller won high praise from Nimitz. "The work of Lieutenant Puller on board this vessel has been excellent."
    Puller was the third marine commander, the other two being deemed by Nimitz to be unsatisfactory.*

    *Nimitz, E.B. Potter, Naval Institute Press, 1976, p. 160.

  10. Al Maviva
    February 18th, 2006 at 09:19 | #10
    Interesting. Puller's work as a sergeant/brevet captain in putting down the Haitian rebellion was really incredible stuff. While that story about working with Nimitz was an interesting insight into Puller's ethos, the way he drove his men to destroy the Haitian insurgency nearly nine years earlier, as a sergeant in charge of a company, may be even more informative. There are good lessons for today's counterinsurgency fighters, if any have the time to study Puller's early career. I believe a number of other bright lights in the Marine firmament in WWII and Korea learned the art of war in Haiti and the other brushfire campaigns between the World Wars.
  11. Sean Bannion
    February 20th, 2006 at 10:53 | #11
    They all learned from the same playbook which was finally formalized in 1939. It's called the "Small Wars Manual." You can find it online in .pdf form. Just Google "Marine, "small wars.""

    I went to the Naval War College in 1998 and this was the first time I had ever heard about the book. Lessons from that 1939 draft are still applicable today. (OK, maybe not the chapter on how to pack a mule for mountain fighting. No kiddin' it's in there.)

Comments are closed.