Home > The Loony Left > Bye-bye, NOLA

Bye-bye, NOLA

January 17th, 2006

Y’know, I used to love New Orleans, and was even halfway entertaining the notion of trying to get down to either Mardi Gras or Jazzfest this spring. But not now:

NEW ORLEANS, Jan. 16 — Mayor C. Ray Nagin suggested Monday that hurricanes Katrina and Rita and other storms were a sign that “God is mad at America” — and at black communities, too, for tearing themselves apart with violence and political infighting.

“Surely God is mad at America. He sent us hurricane after hurricane after hurricane, and it’s destroyed and put stress on this country,” Nagin said as he and other city leaders marked Martin Luther King Jr. Day.

“Surely he doesn’t approve of us being in Iraq under false pretenses. But surely he is upset at black America also. We’re not taking care of ourselves.”

Nagin, who is African American, also promised that New Orleans will be a “chocolate” city again. Many of the city’s black neighborhoods were heavily damaged by Katrina.

Many of the city’s white neighborhoods were too, of course; in fact, the proportion was just about equal. But the WaPo, eager to bend over and kiss the ass of this raving racist lunatic, obviously feels the need to perpetuate and bolster its original lying narrative about racial injustice in America, so there you go. Pure, unashamed propaganda, in the service of a race-baiting incompetent who desperately hopes to deflect attention from the fact that if any one person is to blame for the loss of life, black or white, in Katrina’s wake, it’s Ray Nagin. Thank your friends at the WaPo, Ray; in the finest liberal tradition, they’re doing their best to save you from your own irresponsibility and blank stupidity.

“It’s time for us to come together. It’s time for us to rebuild New Orleans — the one that should be a chocolate New Orleans,” the mayor said. “This city will be a majority-African American city. It’s the way God wants it to be. You can’t have New Orleans no other way. It wouldn’t be New Orleans.”

Sorry, but that tears it. Not one more dime of my money will be spent in New Orleans as long as this bum is mayor. If he can get away with making insane Pat Robertson-like proclamations like this one without one censurious peep from the Left/MSM/Dem axis about it in objection — and he will — then I can surely be forgiven for saying that if my white ass ain’t welcome in NOLA, I’ll damned sure keep it the hell out, and I’ll also gladly advocate for cutting NOLA off from any of Uncle Sugar’s tax-dollar largesse, too.

But this being New Orleans Chocolate City and all, I find the WaPo’s positioning of this at the end of Nagin’s religio-flake diatribe utterly hilarious:

A day earlier, gunfire erupted at a parade to commemorate King’s birthday. Three people were wounded in the daylight shooting amid a throng of mostly black spectators, but police said there were no immediate suspects or witnesses.

And suddenly, I don’t feel as if by boycotting Chocolate City USA (formerly known as Murderville) I’ll really be missing much. Keep your sinking ghetto metropolis, Ray(cist) Nagin. And keep your thieving hands out of my pocket, too. Not one more federal dime for you and the dissolute self-seeking fools who elected you. Not one more dime from me. Next time you need bailing out (literally) from your own pathetic folly, you might try going and pissing up a rope, or taking a flying fuck at a rolling donut.

Let ‘em sink for all me.

Update! Nagin shoulda just let the media do its usual thing and pretend it never happened:

Pressed later to explain his comments, Nagin, who is black, told CNN affiliate WDSU-TV that he was referring to creation of a racially diverse city in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, insisting that his remarks were not divisive.

“How do you make chocolate? You take dark chocolate, you mix it with white milk, and it becomes a delicious drink. That is the chocolate I am talking about,” he said.

“New Orleans was a chocolate city before Katrina. It is going to be a chocolate city after. How is that divisive? It is white and black working together, coming together and making something special.”

Oh, please. What an insult. We’re all used to seeing some very shifty squirming and writhing around when some liberal politician or other gets caught letting his true self be seen from behind the usual mask, but this is pretty damned inept weaseling even for Nagin. I admit, though, that with this feeble attempt, the whole contretemps just devolved into something a lot more humorous than it is anything else.

How long can these damned fool Democrats keep this sort of thing up? Seems like every time one of them opens his yap these days, on just about any topic, he ends up with both left feet firmly implanted in it.

(Via Balloon Juice)

  • Share/Bookmark
Comments appear entirely at the whim of the guy who pays the bills for this site, and may be deleted, edited, ridiculed, or otherwise pissed over as he in his capricious fancy sees fit. Thank you.
  1. January 17th, 2006 at 16:24 | #1
    I went down to the Steel Pony Express show some years back down there. I do believe I'll be giving it a miss in future.
  2. Ric Locke
    January 17th, 2006 at 19:58 | #2
    I have no brief whatever for Ray Nagin, but in this case I think you (and a lot of folks 'round the blogosphere) are giving him a bad rap. True, he had a Chirac moment (i.e., he missed a golden opportunity to keep his mouth shut) but it isn't as bad as it sounds.

    The "chocolate city" meme isn't new, and it's always meant just what Nagin said in his explanation -- neither black nor white, but a mixture better than either alone. Race relations in NO are quite different from those elsewhere in the country, a subject much larger than a blog comment; but, in many ways, Nagin is right -- New Orleans was/is a black city in which whites are adjuncts, rather than the other way 'round as elsewhere.

    And you appear to have glossed over "We’re not taking care of ourselves." The country in general would be better off if more blacks had that attitude.

    Regards,
    Ric

  3. A Recovering Liberal
    January 17th, 2006 at 20:22 | #3
    Mayor Nagin might be able to soft-shoe his "chocolate city" comments tonight, but how can he tap-dance around the remarks about God? The man consistently comes across as a nitwit.
  4. January 18th, 2006 at 07:31 | #4
    Mayor Nagin is an incompetent bone-head whose inaction probably cost lives. His blaming it on good is true to form. He cannot face the fact he bolloxed thing up on a monumental scale.
  5. Al-Bu\’ush Front
    January 18th, 2006 at 16:00 | #5
    50 Cent also said that Katrina was "an act of God" and that it "was meant to happen". He made these remarks as a reaction against Kanye West. I just get SO MAD when people talk that way... no one is saying the hurricane itself was directly Bush's fault, but rather the federal response to it.

    Of course Nagin and Blanco should also get the blame, but I'd like to see some more disaster preparedness if we're handing the Bush federal government all that freakin money. We have FEMA for a lot of good reasons. Maybe Michael Brown was not able to respect that, but true it remains.

  6. Steve Skubinna
    January 18th, 2006 at 16:17 | #6
    Ric, your explanation of what Nagin really meant by "chocolate city" is belied by his second statement, that it would be a majority African-American city.

    Face it, he made some extraordinarily stupid remarks, even by the standards of political demagogery.

  7. Al-Bu’ush Front
    January 18th, 2006 at 16:45 | #7
    Nagin was basically trying to say that he wants the Blacks who got pushed out by Katrina to be able to return.

    But he expressed that using what are, in my opinion, very stupid Southern racial categories. We non-Southerners sort of cock our heads to the side when people are referred to as "chocolate".

    But I do that with Southern folks a lot on all kinds of things, anyway. They have some weeeeird little obsessions in their heads.

  8. January 18th, 2006 at 16:54 | #8
    As a Southerner who recently married a Northerner and lived in the capital of Yankeeland (NYC) for a few years myself, I can state categorically that we Southerners got nothing on y'all whatever for overall weird obsesssions.

    But hey, that could be the mint juleps talkin', I admit it.

  9. Al-Bu’ush Front
    January 18th, 2006 at 17:25 | #9
    Most Northerners and Southerners aren't all that different to me, anyway. Oftentimes provincial as all get out.

    I had this one guy from Philly try to tell me that this one other person from Baltimore was bad because she was from Baltimore! It just SOUNDS stupid, and is.

    Really, it's a matter of them not being good Yankees. They're the ones who found this country, held it together through our murderous Civil War, led it through the trials of the Great Depression and the fight against fascism, brought forth hope for nationwide civil rights, defended democracy during the Cold War, and did other great things. Yankeeism has been, and should be, an ideal to which people aspire.

    In return, the South has basically used great Yankee leaders for target shooting practice - when not busy burning down each other's churches, casually throwing around the n-word, and pimping for the Confederacy. It's an embarrassment.

  10. January 18th, 2006 at 17:49 | #10
    *walks away quickly, whistling and looking furtively back over shoulder*
  11. Al-Bu’ush Front
    January 18th, 2006 at 17:54 | #11
    Huh? You're actually scared by what I said?

    (Yawn.) It's nice to get proven right so quickly.

  12. January 18th, 2006 at 17:58 | #12
    Scared? Moi? Not hardly, Skippy. I just figured I'd leave the room and let some other reader take a stab at the light work this time.
  13. Al-Bu’ush Front
    January 18th, 2006 at 18:02 | #13
    Light work? Is that a reference to me?
  14. January 18th, 2006 at 18:09 | #14
    Well, to your transparent troll attempt, more accurately.
  15. Al-Bu’ush Front
    January 18th, 2006 at 18:22 | #15
    It was a discussion. You're welcome to start responding, that's fine. If, however, you think someone is attempting to troll you should be a touch more upfront about it rather than walking off and whistling.

    I noticed a link to "Confederate Yankee" on this blogroll, was that your doing? Talk about comforting the enemy!

  16. January 18th, 2006 at 18:39 | #16
    For all I know, you may be sincere in thinking what you were doing was a discussion, but saying some fairly insulting and inflammatory things about where I'm pleased and proud to hail from and then claiming I'm "scared" to respond looks a lot more like an attempt to bait me from here, dude. As for the "walks away whistling" thing, that was just my attempt at humor, nothing more. Sorry if I got a little prickly and misunderstood you, but as I said, it looked like trolling to me, and I've dealt with way too much of that sort of thing over the years to be bothered much by it now.
  17. Al-Bu’ush Front
    January 18th, 2006 at 21:01 | #17
    Not responding to the stuff I said which upset you looks like a total attempt to avoid a discussion. If you think my views on the South are inaccurate, say so. If you think the facts I pointed out are inaccurate, especially that series of claims I made about Yankees, you can discuss that as well. But flippant, vague humor isn't going to cut it.

    Southern arrogance has been infuriating me for some time. Hearing it called "The War of Northern Aggression" makes me want to snap with rage. Seeing the Stars and Bars next to a Support Our Troops sticker on someone's car causes a lot of pain inside me. I've already mentioned the racial stuff. I mostly laugh it off, since the scumbags who do this are a minority, but the problem is the rest of us must kowtow to them or else we're "elitists" who are offending their wounded, precious pride. And then I come to this site with its link to a Rebel scum blog.

    I can say as a non-Southerner, observing as something of an outsider, that this stuff has roots in Southern culture which persist to this day. I was never, ever, ever brought up to coddle America's enemies like the Redcoats, the Nazis, the Imperial Japanese, the Communists, etc. but then I see people defending the Confederacy and flying that flag... unbelievable. Such things do not give a good impression, and it's NOT because I'm some stuck up Yankee.

  18. January 18th, 2006 at 21:18 | #18
    Actually, given the increasing Latino population in Austin, I think you could make a good case for "Salsaville."
  19. January 18th, 2006 at 21:24 | #19
    Uhh, dude, first off, calm down.

    Second, calm down.

    Third, I'm not running this site to be at the beck and call of every Johnny-come-lately who comes through the door with a chip on his shoulder and thinks if I don't make time to talk about what he wants to talk about, then I'm "avoiding discussion."

    Did it ever occur to you to search through the archives here to see if the topic you want to discuss has already been covered? In this particular case (North vs. South, Civil War history, at least some of which you're dead wrong about, and that's all I'm going to say about that), it has been, more than once. LARGE CAVEAT: some of the oldest archives here were lost when I transitioned from Grey Matter to Movable Type a few years ago; whether the discussion you're looking for is among 'em, I can't say. I don't much care, honestly.

    But the bottom line is, as I've said 'til I'm blue in the face, this is MY site, I run it the way I want, and I post about what I want to post about. I may or may not respond to commenters, depending on caprice, whim, mood, and whether I even have time to do justice to what I want to say; I consider the post itself my comment, and often as not I don't have much more to say about a given subject than what I put on the main page.

    If I feel a topic has been adequately covered in the past here, I'm not going to go over it all again just because you weren't hanging around the first time out. If I don't have much interest in a certain topic, I'm not going to burn the limited time I have to play around with this site to talk about it. And I don't care if it harelips every cannibal in the Congo.

    I assure you that, now that I know a bit more about your mindset (and its apparent rigid, closed, and near-hysterical nature), you're wasting your time around here. You aren't going to agree with much that I have to say, and having been where you are back in my college days (ie, well left of center), I won't agree with you either. Neither of us is going to bend much, there is no common ground to be found between us, and since I already made a polite and even friendly overture to you once, only to have it rebuffed with a dismissive, arrogant statement about what "isn't going to cut it" -- as if you had any say-so whatsoever about what "cuts it" and what doesn't around here -- I'd suggest that you go find another sandbox to play in.

  20. Al-Bu’ush Front
    January 19th, 2006 at 01:08 | #20
    Mike, who owns this site or doesn't is not even relevant. Accusing me of trolling via some sarcastic comment is ridiculous no matter who I'm dealing with.

    No, I never thought about searching through archives because 1) this topic was already related anyway and 2) I was looking for a current post that other people would likely be reading. Oh well, one out of two isn't bad!

    How cute you adopt a patronizing tone when talking about your college days. University students should look at you as a cautionary tale more than anything else. Besides, how committed of a leftist were you if you're not one now? That stuff is about as believable as those chain emails from "lifelong liberal Democrats" who suddenly morph into Republicans. Uh-huh.

    I'm hysterical! I'm crazy! I ignore what people say in posts and scream about owning websites! I make jokes about African cannibals getting harelips! Yeah, dude, I must need some of Rush's calming drugs.

    Anyway, since you're almost completely ignoring my posts, this discussion is over, and you're still wrong, and so is any piece of filth human being who sides with the Confederacy. The South would do well to hang its head in shame and learn from its Yankee betters, but that's not happening, obviously.

  21. January 19th, 2006 at 22:00 | #21
    Mike, if you want to drop the hammer on this flaming piece of troll shit, I'm certainly not going to whine about it.

    Shit, at least Zorro is polite.

Comments are closed.
Arizona Landscaping - Bingo - United Specialties - Renegade Motorhomes