Home > Fucking Morons, Guardians Of Freedom > King Obama takes it to the enemy, kicks ass, takes names, puts them in their place

King Obama takes it to the enemy, kicks ass, takes names, puts them in their place

December 4th, 2009

I know Noel already mentioned this one, but I can’t resist the opportunity to sling a little more invective at the appalling retard (no, not Noel, smartypants):

When President Obama spoke to troops at Alaska’s Elmendorf Air Force Base last month, the unit there parked a shiny new F-22 fighter plane in the hangar. But according to multiple sources, White House aides demanded the plane be changed to an older F-15 fighter because they didn’t want Obama speaking in front of the F-22, a controversial program he fought hard to end.

“White House aides actually made them remove the F-22-said they would not allow POTUS to be pictured with the F-22 in any way, shape, or form,” one source close to the unit relayed.

The airmen there took offense to the Obama aides’ demand, sources told The Cable, seeing it as a slight to the folks who are operating the F-22 proudly every day.

Hey, who cares what you bloodthirsty, knuckledragging losers think? Certainly not your Commander In Thief. Why, most of you didn’t even vote for Him.

Good to see Osama Obama courageously standing firm, even when he’s in the enemy’s camp. Good, too, to see how he wins over people and inspires new respect, and re-establishes our tattered credibility everywhere he goes, with his suave charm, superior intellect, all-around competence — and complete drooling-moonbat cluelessness. And here’s another one that deserves a second mention here:

During the Senate Armed Services hearing today, Defense Secretary Robert Gates was pressed by Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. on whether the July 2011 date for beginning to withdrawal troops is “locked in.”

It was a point of contention at the White House briefing today – I asked White House spokesman Robert Gibbs if senators were incorrect calling the date a “target.”

After the briefing, Gibbs went to the president for clarification. Gibbs then called me to his office to relate what the president said. The president told him it IS locked in – there is no flexibility. Troops WILL start coming home in July 2011. Period. It’s etched in stone. Gibbs said he even had the chisel.

And once again, for all you righties and “moderates” who so desperately sought hope in this blackguard’s vacuous speech the other night, the lesson is yours to learn: when our so-called president tries to pander to the middle, he’s lying. When he’s tacking hard Left, you can take whatever he says to the bank.

He’s going to send a bunch of our soldiers to Afghanistan, have them sit around with bullseyes on their backs for a few months, and then turn tail and run just in time to shore up his anti-American lunatic base for the 2012 election.

Anybody who buys anything reasonably centrist this O-bomination says is a fool. He’s playing politics with war; playing politics with soldiers’ lives; playing politics with national security; and playing politics with America’s future. It’s all he does, because it’s all he is; he has absolutely no experience doing anything other than being a manipulative, deceitful, self-serving political hack whose core beliefs are entirely Leftist, contra-Constitutional, and authoritarian. As I’ve said many times already, and will no doubt have occasion to say again and again over the next three agonizing years, he is beneath contempt.

Our so-called president is an America- and military-hating dick with ears, and that’s the simple truth. Full stop, end of story.

Update! A clear-eyed view from the People’s Republic of Obamachusetts:

America is not Massachusetts. Most Americans believe our military has been a force for good, and that we have used our strength to make the world a better place. And millions of people liberated from Hitler, Soviet Communism and Saddam Hussein happen to agree.

But Massachusetts does represent the base of Obama’s party, and that base must be appeased. And so we get “Defeat Through Strength.” He sends in troops, and their combat instructions are “don’t bother to unpack.”

For 18 months we’ll pretend to fight a war. Some 100 or so soldiers and Marines will be killed – not for a military objective, but for a political one. To protect Obama and his party from the consequences of their Afghanistan policy.

Exactly. And, to turn one of their own pet phrases back on them, who wants to be the last to die for a Democrat Socialist lie?

  • Share/Bookmark
Comments appear entirely at the whim of the guy who pays the bills for this site, and may be deleted, edited, ridiculed, or otherwise pissed over as he in his capricious fancy sees fit. Thank you.
  1. December 4th, 2009 at 09:20 | #1
    Goldfarb:

    What Do the Dalai Lama and the F-22 Have in Common?

    Answer: Obama won't pose for a picture with either of them

    This president wants to "Free Tibet!"--as long as it doesn't involve F-22s, the Dalai Lama or offending China.

    What possible damage could have been done by the President of the United States standing in front of the nation's most advanced aircraft -- a feat of American technology -- while speaking to Air Force personnel. It suggests that this administration's opposition to the F-22 program was not entirely rational, and that American national security may have suffered as a result of some bizarre hostility within this administration toward...a fighter plane.

    Maybe we could cancel the F-15, too. We'll take the Enola Gay out of mothballs and use that instead (with the Japanese emperor's permission, of course!).

    Then Obama can say he achieved Gays in the Military, too!

Comments are closed.
Credit Counseling - Credit Consolidation - Credit Card Consolidation - United Specialties