Home > Disasters Near and Far, Life In The O!gulag, Obama Lies, Our Allies, Our Enemies > Ask Not What Obama Will Do for Freedom

Ask Not What Obama Will Do for Freedom

November 4th, 2009

FOR TO ASK IS TO ANSWER

“The first time I met President Reagan I told him this story. I felt free to tell him everything. I told him of the brilliant day when we learned about his Evil Empire speech from an article in Pravda or Izvestia that found its way into the prison. When I said that our whole block burst out into a kind of loud celebration and that the world was about to change, well, then the president, this great tall man, just lit up like a schoolboy. His face lit up and beamed. He jumped out of his seat like a shot and started waving his arms wildly and calling for everyone to come in to hear “this man’s” story. It was really only then that I started to appreciate that it wasn’t just in the Soviet Union that President Reagan must have suffered terrible abuse for this great speech, but that he must have been hurt at home too. It seemed as though our moment of joy was the moment of his own vindication. That the great punishment he had endured for this speech was worth it.”

Q: “Can it really be said that Ronald Reagan was actually responsible for an event as great as the collapse of the Soviet Union?”

A: “Yes.”–Natan Sharansky

Like prisoners of the Soviet Gulag, Iranian students ask:

“Obama, Obama, Are you with the regime or with us?”

An Italian Court asked Obama a similar question:

An Italian judge on Wednesday convicted 23 Americans in absentia of the 2003 kidnapping of an Egyptian cleric from a Milan street, in a landmark case involving the CIA’s extraordinary rendition program in the war on terrorism.

Bob Dole e-mailed, Your Honor. He said you can have those agents back–when Italy gives him back the use of his right arm, which he left at Castel d’Aiano in the Apennines when your Nazi pals shot him in the back, you Mussolini-worshiping spaghetti-spined cognoscenti.

But then, why should an Italian judge show more regard for CIA agents than the President and the Attorney General of the United States? They have repeatedly used CIA agents as a political football as it suited their needs, threatening them even now with prosecution.

That judge was asking Obama the same question as the Iranian students: Are you on the side of freedom or not? And the same answer comes back both times:

“Not”.

By the way, shall we expect the Italian Court’s indictment of these gentlemen for rendition?

Richard Clarke: “The first time I proposed a snatch, in 1993, the White House Counsel, Lloyd Cutler, demanded a meeting with the President to explain how it violated international law. Clinton had seemed to be siding with Cutler until Al Gore belatedly joined the meeting, having just flown overnight from South Africa. Clinton recapped the arguments on both sides for Gore: Lloyd says this. Dick says that. Gore laughed and said, “That’s a no-brainer. Of course it’s a violation of international law, that’s why it’s a covert action. The guy is a terrorist. Go grab his ass.”

E baciare il mio.

  • Share/Bookmark
Comments appear entirely at the whim of the guy who pays the bills for this site, and may be deleted, edited, ridiculed, or otherwise pissed over as he in his capricious fancy sees fit. Thank you.
  1. November 4th, 2009 at 21:50 | #1
    Great post, and one who's only answer is tht the Italian Court won't go after those folk because they have a "D" after their names or worked for someone with a "D" after their name.
  2. Grand Wizard
    November 4th, 2009 at 22:06 | #2
    Of course Sharansky is now a government minister, a man with power who has chosen to exercise his 'freedom' by being in charge of 'encouraging' Palestinians to leave their homes in East Jerusalem and the West Bank, so that, erm, people who are, erm.... well you know, can take their places. In the rest of the world this process has a clear name. Nice to see you still keep 'freedom' burning Natan, well for those who belong to your chosen tribe of course. If not, they are just 'in the way and should go to another Arab country, right'? You honestly couldn't make this stuff up. And how dare the Italians not let the CIA run amok in their country. They'll be saying they are a sovereign nation next and wanting the airbases out etc.
  3. November 4th, 2009 at 22:42 | #3
    It's less a matter of what he's gonna do FOR freedom and more a matter of what he plans to do TO it.
  4. November 5th, 2009 at 00:00 | #4
    Oh, I think we know what he'll do to it, given half a chance.
  5. November 5th, 2009 at 00:38 | #5
    shit! That Algore quote actually makes me kinda respect him
  6. November 5th, 2009 at 09:13 | #6
    You'll get over it, E.--Al did.

    There's a reason it's not called "Arab-rusalem", Grand Kleagle. And the CIA wasn't "running amok"; they worked with the help of Italian authorities, who this judge also convicted. The only one running amok here is Judge Castratti. Like you, he reflexively sides with the PLO in Israel, al Qaeda in Italy and Obama in America.

    When Reagan spoke, political prisoners rejoiced.
    When Obama speaks, their jailers do.

  7. RuthenianCowboy
    November 5th, 2009 at 10:50 | #7
    Wow, I can't beleive Algore showed some cojones. What happened to him?
  8. November 5th, 2009 at 13:14 | #8
    His Dilithium batteries leaked.
Comments are closed.