Home > Domestic Disputes > Jeff G, exposed

Jeff G, exposed

March 9th, 2009

At Hot Air. Go read it all. I’ll have more to say on it when I get time, I assure you. But for now, suffice to say that I couldn’t agree more. The time for tailoring our words out of significant concern over whether our enemies might be able to distort them is past; they will find a way, always, and there’s absolutely no reason to think otherwise. The discussion going forward, it seems to me, ought to be about how we’re going to go around the liars and speak directly to honest people of good will — while revealing, every chance we get, the craven dishonesty the shameless Left has no qualms about employing as a political tactic.

  • Share/Bookmark
Comments appear entirely at the whim of the guy who pays the bills for this site, and may be deleted, edited, ridiculed, or otherwise pissed over as he in his capricious fancy sees fit. Thank you.
  1. March 9th, 2009 at 16:24 | #1
    Jeff Goldstein literally has changed how I view language. I feel his pain, though, because I've tried to have this conversation with smart, right leaning people and CANNOT get through their head.

    My intent is the only thing that is important when I say something. You can argue what I intended to say and be logically consistent. What you cannot say is "I know you didn't mean X, but since someone might misconstrue X, you should have said something else".

    It's dishonest and illogical.

    I wish PW was only JG. I like the other people, but only enjoy reading Jeff.

  2. March 9th, 2009 at 16:36 | #2
    Mark me down as an Outlaw.
  3. N. O’Brain
    March 9th, 2009 at 18:40 | #3
    Start with this: they aren't "progressives", they are reactionary leftists.
  4. March 9th, 2009 at 19:01 | #4
    No, straight up socialists. It's just a matter of time before they start openly calling themselves such.
  5. Michelle
    March 9th, 2009 at 20:48 | #5
    JG is a mordern snakeoil salesman and a little one at that.

    This is all so inside baseball. It won't have any effect on anything. It just keeps the participants busy while they try to figure out what to do with their lives.

  6. March 10th, 2009 at 11:03 | #6
    Michelle, is there an actual argument against Jeff's stance on intentionalism or is ad hominem attacks all we can expect?
Comments are closed.