Home > Second Coming > The light at the end of the tunnel

The light at the end of the tunnel

December 13th, 2008

For anyone who still gives a damn about individual liberty, freedom of speech, the Constitution, and a future for the US that even passingly resembles something the Founders wouldn’t rise up and spit on, this might be the most chilling thing you read all day:

Obama was quite serious when he said he was going to change the world. And now he has a national crisis, a personal mandate, a pliant Congress, a desperate public — and, at his disposal, the greatest pot of money in galactic history. (I include here the extrasolar planets.)

It begins with a near $1 trillion stimulus package. This is where Obama will show himself ideologically. It is his one great opportunity to plant the seeds for everything he cares about: a new green economy, universal health care, a labor resurgence, government as benevolent private-sector “partner.” The first hint came yesterday, when Obama claimed, “If we want to overcome our economic challenges, we must also finally address our health care challenge” — the perfect non sequitur that gives carte blanche to whatever health-care reform and spending the Obama team dreams up. It is the community organizer’s ultimate dream.

Ironically, when the economy tanked in mid-September, it was assumed that both presidential candidates could simply forget about their domestic agendas because with $700 billion drained by financial system rescues, not a penny would be left to spend on anything else.

On the contrary. With the country clamoring for action and with all psychological barriers to government intervention obliterated (by the conservative party, no less), the stage is set for a young, ambitious, supremely confident president — who sees himself as a world-historical figure before even having been sworn in — to begin a restructuring of the American economy and the forging of a new relationship between government and people.

No, a further intensifying of the eternal one, between fucker and fuckee.

Update! Okay, the Krauthammer piece might not be the most chilling thing you read all day after all. This is.

(Via Glenn and Ross Douthat)

  • Share/Bookmark
Comments appear entirely at the whim of the guy who pays the bills for this site, and may be deleted, edited, ridiculed, or otherwise pissed over as he in his capricious fancy sees fit. Thank you.
  1. December 13th, 2008 at 11:53 | #1
    The Krauthammer piece is unnerving. The one under the update...if only because, especially in the past 20 years or so, you could plainly see the change from "office politics" (yes, we had our own version of that in the military) to "political animal" to some degree at the upper level of senior enlisted...but most glaringly at the senior officer corps. To their defense, some of that had to happen because of their dealings with Congress and other political animals, just to get or keep funding (be it for individual programs/projects, or overall budgets in general)

    Beware the "man with a mission or a mandate". That will be the one who has the greatest chance of becoming "Gen Brutis". I like the author's notion this will happen about four or more years from now. This will remove (for the most part) the chance this individual would have come up through the ranks starting in or at the end of Viet Nam. That would break the ties with any of the old guard from back in the Korea or WWII days. And tie into the more socially engineered military which came into being starting in the early 70's (remember Z grams anyone?).

    Yeah this kinda thing gives me the willies...and I'm fearless.

  2. wolfwalker
    December 13th, 2008 at 19:48 | #2
    That second one is a joke, for one simple reason: any military coup in the USA would require junior officers to follow illegal orders. But members of our armed forces at all levels are taught that they must never obey an illegal order.
  3. apotheosis
    December 14th, 2008 at 02:32 | #3
    The "coup" scenario might be borderline silly (and not very well executed), but it's not really the main thrust of the article. Set it aside. The author makes some rational and valid points about the proper role of the modern military that are very much worth reading.
Comments are closed.