Home > Fucking Morons > Why we can’t have nice things — like privacy

Why we can’t have nice things — like privacy

September 18th, 2008

A worthless oxygen thief reveals all:

I read though the emails… ALL OF THEM… before I posted, and what I concluded was anticlimactic, there was nothing there, nothing incriminating, nothing that would derail her campaign as I had hoped, all I saw was personal stuff, some clerical stuff from when she was governor…. And pictures of her family

I then started a topic on /b/, peeps asked for pics or gtfo and I obliged, then it started to get big

Earlier it was just some prank to me, I really wanted to get something incriminating which I was sure there would be, just like all of you anon out there that you think there was some missed opportunity of glory, well there WAS NOTHING, I read everything, every little blackberry confirmation… all the pictures, and there was nothing, and it finally set in, THIS internet was serious business, yes I was behind a proxy, only one, if this shit ever got to the FBI I was fucked, I panicked, i still wanted the stuff out there but I didn’t know how to rapidshit all that stuff, so I posted the pass on /b/, and then promptly deleted everything, and unplugged my internet and just sat there in a comatose state

Then the white knight fucker came along, and did it in for everyone, I trusted /b/ with that email password, I had gotten done what I could do well, then passed the torch , all to be let down by the douchebaggery, good job /b/, this is why we cant have nice things

You won’t have many “nice things” while you’re staring at the grim, grey walls of a federal prison, you piece of shit — unless you consider having easy access to your candy ass traded on the block for cigarettes by your overlarge triple-homicide cellie a nice thing. You and every other felonious Obamadroid involved will hopefully be landing in said prison quite soon, and staying for a good, long while too.

Update! Needless to say, the DNC’s in-house wire service won’t be cooperating with the investigation. Too busy poking around for more state secrets to leak for the purposes of undermining the WOT, one suspects.

(Via Dan)

Updated update! Ace has a pic of the little shit, who happens to be the son of a Tennessee state legislator. Not that there’s any evidence I know of that his old man had anything to do with it, but go ahead and try to guess which party. Go on, I dare ya.

Good luck in prison, shitweasel.

  • Share/Bookmark
Comments appear entirely at the whim of the guy who pays the bills for this site, and may be deleted, edited, ridiculed, or otherwise pissed over as he in his capricious fancy sees fit. Thank you.
  1. apotheosis
    September 18th, 2008 at 10:47 | #1
    I hope it works out that way for this little douchebag, hoss, but I wouldn't hold my breath.

    If a government official can stuff his pants full of classified documents, walk out of the national archives, and get nothing worse than a slap on the wrist...

  2. September 18th, 2008 at 10:47 | #2
    Hmmm, aren't the lefties the HUGE proponents of privacy issues and anti-snooping laws? Aren't they also the people who went into fits of PSH (Pants Shitting Hysteria) over the Mary McFate issue (the alleged NRA "spy" who infiltrated several anti-gun groups)??

    It's nice, but not surprising, to see that they don't practice what they preach...it's also WONDERFUL that they violated any number of laws, published a bunch of e-mail addresses likely causing a HUGE amount of problems for a large group of people and they found abso-fucking-lutely NADA in the way of "incriminating evidence." Beautiful!

    The outcome of the "Yahoo!gate" break-in is definitely a win for McCain-Palin...the swing voters get to see a bunch of hysterical, desperate fanatics commit criminal acts to attempt to secure information to smear Palin with and, lo and behold, her personal and professional correspondence shows that she is an honest and dilligent servant of the people.

    A few ads comparing Yahoo!gate's results to the actions of the Obama campaign to stifle the release of what SHOULD be public information and the organized attempts by Obamaniacs to disrupt journalists looking into Obama's past via legitimate means should do nicely to secure even more swing voters. Can I hear the Obamanauts scream one more time about how Republicans are trampling the Constitution?

  3. angryflower
    September 18th, 2008 at 11:57 | #3
    "unless you consider having easy access to your candy ass traded on the block for cigarettes by your overlarge triple-homicide cellie a nice thing."

    Because rape is funny. Get a life.

    "You and every other felonious Obamadroid"

    What does Obama have to do with this? The perps used computers - YOU use a computer - I bet you're involved!

    "It's nice, but not surprising, to see that they don't practice what they preach"

    Nice job with the selective outrage and attempts to pin this entirely on the "left", its dishonest and slimy and you know it.

    "Too busy poking around for more state secrets to leak for the purposes of undermining the WOT, one suspects."

    "One" is a joke of a human being, sorry. What state secrets do you think Palin would have been in possession of IN A YAHOO ACCOUNT?

    You want this person running things, you lying fools?

  4. September 18th, 2008 at 12:26 | #4
    Shouldn't you be out suppressing free speech someplace, cornflower? Or otherwise doing the bidding of your Lord?

    You would-be-fascist automatons running things is what scares me (FYI, the Vice President doesn't run much of anything). But not very much, because you mouthy twerps are all garden-variety punks deep down. Get yourselves dragged out from behind your internet anonymity and you all fold up like piss-soaked origami.

    In short, go take a flying fuck at the moon, asshole-eyes.

  5. ErikZ
    September 18th, 2008 at 18:31 | #5
    A Yahoo account?

    I have a yahoo mail account. I use it as an email contact for web pages I don't trust. People actually use these things for regular email?

  6. Mikey NTH
    September 18th, 2008 at 20:35 | #6
    apotheosis:

    This guy isn't Sandy Berger. And what he did is something that no elected official - left right up down - wants done to him/herself. This isn't 9/11 documents.

    If it is this kid, he is so toast. He is going to receive a legal-type colonoscopy that no human should receive, except he volunteered for it.

    So go! FBI, Secret Service, Postal Inspectors! Go!

    l33t h/\xor pwned11!1 teh suxor1!!1 lulz!1!!!!! elventy11!!!*

    *Federal Court does not recognize 'cute' as a defense.

  7. Stymphalian Bird
    September 19th, 2008 at 01:23 | #7
    Thats becuase liberals don beleive in pricacy ecept when it comes to drug dealer,child molesters and rapitists
Comments are closed.