Home > The Loony Left > What’s wrong with you people?

What’s wrong with you people?

September 11th, 2008

The Dems are indeed terrified; they’re right to be, because it’s looking more and more like ‘04 all over again:

Polls showing John McCain tied or even ahead of Barack Obama are stirring angst and second-guessing among some of the Democratic Party’s most experienced operatives, who worry that Obama squandered opportunities over the summer and may still be underestimating his challenges this fall.

“It’s more than an increased anxiety,” said Doug Schoen, who worked as one of Bill Clinton’s lead pollsters during his 1996 reelection and has worked for both Democrats and independents in recent years. “It’s a palpable frustration. Deep-seated unease in the sense that the message has gotten away from them.”

“They were set up to run ‘experience versus change,’ what they had run [against Hillary] Clinton,” Trippi said. “And I think Palin clearly moved that to be change [and] reform, versus change. They are adjusting to that and that threw them off balance a little bit.”

A major Democratic fundraiser described it a good bit more starkly after digesting the polls of recent days: “I’m so depressed. It’s happening again. It’s a nightmare.”

Delicious, and so good for you.

Lake joined other Democratic veterans, some speaking not for attribution, in emphasizing a classic liberal woe: that the Democrat let the Republican define him.

“Obama needed to define himself,” Lake said.

See, that’s your problem. He already has, and Americans don’t necessarily like what they see. Because what they see is a callow hack, a typical machine politician mouthing meaningless platitudes about “hope” and “change,” without anything behind them except the promise of more taxes, more spending, and more intrusive government. They see a guy who willingly associates with terrorists and bigots, and they know you don’t hang out with America-hating scumbags for all those years without having at least some sympathy for their views. They know Obama is the most extreme Left candidate ever to get as close as he has to the Presidency. In short, they know he’s just another statist, weak-on-defense, shallow liberal.

They see him as another in a long, long line of condescending elitist scolds who don’t respect or understand the values and standards most Americans live by. They’re tired of being preached at about America’s faults and failures, by people who think it’s not only acceptable but entirely just for America to assume the second-class power status most of Europe resigned itself to long ago. They see America not as the source of the world’s ills, but the only real hope for coping with them. And until Democrats understand that we’re not just going to sit back and meekly accept their finger-wagging lectures, they’re going to keep right on scratching their heads and wondering why it is we don’t want them running our government and our lives.

You can put all the lipstick on that pig you want, but it’s still a stinking, rotten fish, to mix a couple of slightly-used metaphors.

Update! As good a definition of political elitism as you’ll find anywhere:

Elitism is a sense that the hoi polloi are simply incapable of governing themselves, let alone a nation, and that a small group of “experts” have to take control of everything they do. That goes far beyond mere matters of state. Elitists see people getting more obese and believe that government has to intervene to remove food choices from individuals, as one rather timely example, as in New York City. They believe that removing personal choices will keep people from making bad decisions, because they — in all their wisdom — will make the right choices for them.

This describes perfectly the policy direction of the Democratic Party, and perhaps even a part of the Republican Party as well.

It does indeed. And it also explains why, about this time every four years, Democrats find themselves frantically waving their arms around and plaintively wailing, as in my title, “what’s WRONG with you people?”

  • Share/Bookmark
Comments appear entirely at the whim of the guy who pays the bills for this site, and may be deleted, edited, ridiculed, or otherwise pissed over as he in his capricious fancy sees fit. Thank you.
  1. Martin
    September 11th, 2008 at 09:47 | #1
    Once again the liberals have realized that screaming in our faces isn't working and so the solution must be .... to grab us by the collar and scream even louder!

    It hasn't occurred to them that we understand their message just fine.

    IOW, we are "reading them 5x5," to use an old military term. We get the message, alright, we just don't agree with it and that's what they can't seem to fathom.

  2. kbiel
    September 11th, 2008 at 10:28 | #2
    Chin up Democrats! Here's a spoonful of sugar for your bitter medicine. At least we will have the first woman elected to VP for the next 4-8 years and then we're likely to have the first woman elected as President for the 4-8 years following that. Y'all have long been lecturing us on bringing more diversity to Washington and now you're finally getting it. Oh wait, I forgot that she can't be a woman since she is pro-life and uses guns and eats meat and...worst of all...actually has babies.
  3. teqjack
    September 11th, 2008 at 12:49 | #3
    “Obama needed to define himself,” Lake said.

    Well, golly, he's only been running for about one and a half years. And written TWO autobiograhies. Give him time!

    OTOH, the more time he is allowed the less we seem to know. Except that no mistakes can be attributed to him: mentors, associates, staff, supporters, even grandmothers... but not him. Like voting to keep that Stevens earmark for a bridge to connect a city with its airport when Congress decided to allocate the money but drop specifying that it must be spent on said bridge - obviously that was the fault of some advisor.

Comments are closed.