Cold Fury

Harshing your mellow since 9/01

On the Coming Unpleasantness

Aesop gets real on the Shit Getting Real, riffing on a VDH column which can be perused here, and sums up thus:

Will America keep dividing and soon resort to open violence, as happened in 1861? Or will Americans reunite and bind up our wounds, as we did following the upheavals of the 1930s Great Depression or after the protests of the 1960s? 

The answer lies within each of us. 

Every day we will either treat each other as fellow Americans, with far more uniting than dividing us, or we will continue on the present path that eventually ends in something like a hate-filled Iraq, Rwanda or the Balkans.

Aesop picks up the ball and runs with it:

Hanson has correctly described a binary outcome:
Either the lunacy will stop, or the country will rend itself.


1, or 0.

And he described it, not to put too fine a point on it, in exactly the terms put forward by Matt Bracken years since:

“Bosnia, times Rwanda”
“we will continue on the present path that eventually ends in something like a hate-filled Iraq, Rwanda or the Balkans.”

Hanson is not an instigator, he’s a historian.

He’s showing, with painful precision, that following the edge of this straight-ruler to its logical end leads to flying off a cliff into an abyss at speed, unless people see that inevitable denouement, and decide within themselves to turn away.

Again, Hanson is not suggesting anything; he’s stating with mathematical precision that either things will be done differently, or there will be a conflagration. He is mathematically correct and precise in this formulation.

Having laid out the consequences, I don’t think he’s in denial about the current state of affairs at all.

When one guy, or five guys on the ‘net say “Civil War”, it may be just Tulipomania. When everyone is starting to sound like a chorus, including Stanford historians, there is beginning to be something to it.

Hanson is telling you the product (just as Matt Bracken has).
You may be worried about plugging in the variables.
You may even have them precisely correct, but the greater point is that it’s immaterial.

When you put enough U-235 in close proximity (64kg, in point of historical fact), you achieve a predictable result.

And, as he goes on to say, ain’t nobody gonna like it. At. All. CA responds with this:

Do you honestly believe you can, let alone should, treat the Americans who intentionally and with malice/political/personal gain who destroyed your California as as “fellow Americans, with far more uniting than dividing us”?

How about the Red academics who not only kicked over the Jenga tower of limited government and the rest of Western Civ but set all against all first behind campus walls, and now in the general society? Can and should they be treated as “as fellow Americans, with far more uniting than dividing us”?

The race pimps – same question?

The first and second gen feminists – same question?

The “my wallet and powerlust before country” politicians over our lifetimes – same question?

Othet post-WW2 miscreants – same question?

Those folks are destroyers, plain and simple.

They are not my fellow Americans.

And that right there is the REAL problem. We already know just how amenable to reason they are: not in the least. Which brings us back to that Walsh material I told you earlier you’d be seeing again.

The Democrats today no longer believe in the very system in which they serve.

But our two-party system can only work if both sides are of good will, in common agreement on fundamental principles, and profess fidelity to the country as founded. In their lust for power and the “fundamental transformation” of the Republic into a leftist tyranny, the Democrats can no longer function within such a framework—just as they couldn’t in 1860-61, declaring war first on Lincoln and then on the United States of America itself. It took four long and bloody years for Ulysses S. Grant and William T. Sherman to show them the error of their ways. And even then, a Democrat murdered the president.

Today’s Republicans are, in the main, made of lesser stuff. More patsies than potentates, they roll over at the first hint of trouble; indeed, the late John McCain (R-Ariz.) made a fetish of what he called “comity,” which in his definition meant surrendering to the Left and poking his finger in the eye of the Right. His love children, Senators Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) and Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), would dearly love to inherit his mantle, but alas for the both of them, they’re self-retired short timers, and nobody cares what they think.

But Democrat memories, while long—they stretch back to Aaron Burr, Jefferson’s vice president, who shot Alexander Hamilton and founded Tammany Hall—are selective. They, like Iago, see themselves as victims, frustrated by the evil Federalists/Whigs/Republicans/conservatives from realizing their political program: free pie (in the sky) for all, but all power to themselves. It never occurs to them that, like Michael Douglas in “Falling Down,” they’re the bad guys.

Any movement of the type and magnitude capable of staving off a Civil War-type conflagration of necessity MUST come from their side, towards us. There is no nonviolent way to bridge this gulf otherwise. Having spent decades moving Left themselves, Real Americans already know well enough how that ends up: with further demands, further petulance and threats, further nervous breakdowns, and of late, further violent assaults against them. The Left has no desire to reason with anybody, or debate anybody, or meet anybody halfway. They desire—they intend—to rule. No more, no less.

There is no happy ending to all this, not that I can see. They will not stop; they will have to BE stopped. They will either win, or the real Americans they loathe and despise will. Horrible as it all is, it’s the plain truth, unless an inconceivable tide of profound awakening and enlightenment suddenly washes over them somehow. It’d be awfully nice if such a thing happened, but all the evidence so far says it is NOT the way to bet.


5 thoughts on “On the Coming Unpleasantness

  1. Another conflict coming is between the identity blocs within the powerhungry left. The policy of encouraging people to stay within their respective tribal groups could make for an ugly racial war. In my little (mainly Democrat) neighborhood, one of the few Hmong-majority areas in Minnesota, all the racial tribes keep to themselves. Hmong don’t mix with Somalis, who have nothing to do with the Hispanics that stay away from the Blacks. There are simmering resentments that aren’t difficult to see. I have never seen anyone from any of the groups, including the kids, hang out with any but their own ethnic kind. Nobody even seems to acknowledge the existence of those other groups. When the civil conflagration comes, there could very well be a bloodbath between some of the left’s pet ethnicities.

  2. I would only note that this ALL is going on, not because of the Democrats and the Koch-sucking Rove Republicans, but because of the Only Ones.

    On their own, neither the Democrats nor the Rove Republicans do anything more than talk. It is instead their Blue Wall who rob, rape, and murder at their command.


    When the festivities start, start with THEM. And their families.

  3. What is the possibility that at least some of TPTB want this open violence and think they will be immune? What are the odds that globalists are licking their chops over a divided and weakened US that will be (they think) easier to rope into a one world gov. Presumably they also think the effects could be contained to the US or North America at least. Unfortunately once the dogs of war are let loose they are damned hard to kennel again.

  4. “It’d be awfully nice if such a thing happened, but all the evidence so far says it is NOT the way to bet.” – Mike

    There’s really two and only two probabilities here at this point:

    1) Everything goes sideways at some point in the not too distant future, and it ends in blood and gunsmoke and an American Pinochet and short helicopter rides for Those Who Are Not Our Countrymen – probably also with Prog enablers in the media hanged from overpasses and politcians and bureaucrats impaled and/or crucified along the highways.

    2) Thanks to Trump, we get enough of a breather that the can gets kicked down the road far enough that it goes sideways and hot at some point after those like Mike and myself are too dead or too old and decrepit to have to worry about it – and it ends in blood and gunsmoke and our kids, godkids, and grandkids get to deal with it.

    I see no option where things end peacefully and we all reconcile with the Left and come together in bipartisan harmony. Because the Left isn’t interested in coexistence with us.

    And we cannot coexist with them.

  5. There will be no moment of enlightenment for them. The reason is that they are CRAZY. I don’t mean that in the figurative sense but the literal sense. I know a number of progressive lefties – and I can’t think of a single one that doesn’t have some sort of a diagnosed mental illness. Depression, bipolar, borderline personality disorder, you name it. That means that they cannot control their thoughts and emotions, which explains the meltdowns in the face of adversity. Personally I do not think that someone with a diagnosed mental illness should be allowed to vote.

Comments are closed.



"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." – Claire Wolfe, 101 Things to Do 'Til the Revolution

Subscribe to CF!
Support options


If you enjoy the site, please consider donating:

Click HERE for great deals on ammo! Using this link helps support CF by getting me credits for ammo too.

Image swiped from The Last Refuge

2016 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards


RSS - entries - Entries
RSS - entries - Comments


mike at this URL dot com

All e-mails assumed to be legitimate fodder for publication, scorn, ridicule, or other public mockery unless otherwise specified

Boycott the New York Times -- Read the Real News at Larwyn's Linx

All original content © Mike Hendrix