Acting in a counterintuitive way is not much of a strategy for fighting Muslim terrorism.
Obama initially tried to defeat ISIS by ignoring it. This cunning approach allowed ISIS to seize large chunks of Iraq and Syria. He tried calling ISIS a J.V. team in line with his claim that, â€œWe defeat them in part by saying you are not strong, you are weakâ€. Unimpressed, ISIS seized Mosul. It was still attached to the old-fashioned way of proving it was strong by actually winning land and wars.
Europe and the United States decided to prove that we were not at war with Islam by taking in as many Muslims as we could. Instead of leading to less terrorism, taking in more Muslims led to more terrorism.
Every single counterintuitive strategy for defeating Islamic terrorism has been tried. And it has failed. Overthrowing â€œdictatorsâ€ turned entire countries into terrorist training camps. Bringing Islamists to power in Egypt, Libya and Tunisia led directly to attacks on American diplomatic facilities. The Muslim Brotherhood showed no gratitude to its State Department allies. Instead its militias and forces either aided the attackers or stood by and watched while taking bets on the outcome.
Islamic terrorism has followed an intuitive pattern of cause and effect. Thereâ€™s a reason that the counterintuitive strategies for fighting Islamic terrorism by not fighting Islamic terrorism donâ€™t work. They make no sense. Instead they all depend on convincing Muslims, from the local Imam to Jihadist organizations, to aid us instead of attack us by showing what nice people we are. Meanwhile they also insist that we canâ€™t use the words â€œIslamic terrorismâ€ because Muslims are ticking time bombs who will join Al Qaeda and ISIS the moment we associate terrorism with the I-word.
There are contradictions there that you can drive a tank through.
The counterintuitive strategy assumes that Islamic terrorism will only exist if we use the I-word, that totalitarian Jihadist movements want democracy and that our best allies for fighting Islamic terrorism are people from the same places where Islamic terrorism is a runaway success. And that we should duplicate the demographics of the countries where Islamic terrorism thrives in order to defeat it.
The Westâ€™s counterterrorism strategy makes less sense than the ravings of most mental patients.
You could say the same about socialism too, but the Obamas of the world would still cling as fiercely to it.
If you believe the experts, then Islamic terrorists want us to stop them from entering Europe, America, Canada and Australia. They crave having their terrorists profiled by law enforcement on the way to their latest attack. And they wish we would just carpet bomb them as hard as we can right now.
When ISIS shoots up Paris or Brussels, itâ€™s not really trying to kill infidels for Allah. Instead itâ€™s setting a cunning trap for us. If we react by ending the flow of migrants and preventing the next attack, ISIS wins. If we police Muslim no-go zones, then ISIS also wins. If we deport potential terrorists, ISIS still wins.
ISIS wins no matter what, it’s beginning to look like, until we rediscover 1) our spines, and 2) our self-respect. I’d like to excerpt more of it; it’s chock full of good, solid analysis supported by well-turned phrases, which is just par for the usual course with Daniel. You won’t go wrong by reading all of it. I do have to include this bit, though:
After the San Bernardino shootings, Obama insisted that, â€œOur success wonâ€™t depend on tough talk or abandoning our values… Thatâ€™s what groups like ISIL are hoping for.â€ But ISIS does not care whether Obama talks tough, even if itâ€™s only his version of tough talk in which he puffs out his chest and says things like, â€You are not strong, you are weak.â€ It is not interested in Obamaâ€™s â€œright side of historyâ€ distortion of American values either.
Actually, they want those values–both the true American/Western/Judeo-Christian ones, and Obama’s ahistorical perversion of them–wiped from the earth and replaced with Muslim ones.
Like I said, read all of it. His last line is particularly dead on.