Cold Fury

Harshing your mellow since 9/01

Buckley Conservatives vs Alt-Right

By George, I think he’s got it.

Ideological movements enter into decline at the same point they turn inward and focus on a narrowing set of doctrines that define the cause. That’s the point they lose faith in the future, their future. They turn their tools to the task of maintaining the status quo, often at the expense of the movement and the benefit of the leaders. Today, Buckley Conservatism is mostly a Reagan Mystery Cult with a gift shop for their books, magazines and television programs.

There is some continuation here with the tradition of Buckley, as far as the war on the people to their Right. That has always been an essential element of Buckley Conservatism. Like Progressives, they hate the people to their Right and curry favor with those on their Left. By casting the people on their Right as unacceptable, so the theory goes, they position themselves as the sensible alternative to the Far Right and the Far Left. Buckley cut his teeth purging Burchers and Randians.

The whole point of Buckley Conservatism was to fight the Soviets so this strategy of self-legitimization made some sense. The Left was hoping to emulate the Bolsheviks, not counter them. In order to prevent that from happening, the Right had to be a legitimate counter argument. So, Bill Buckley was willing to throw anyone over the rail if it made him and his cause look good. A lot of people went over the rail as a result.

The problem for Buckley Conservatives is they have nothing to offer. People see 25 years of failure and naturally begin to look elsewhere for answers. The alt-right has loads of problems and parts of it are a bit like heroin, offering momentary relief at the expense of long term happiness. To the person suffering in the present, however, the momentary high from joining a white identity group, for example, feels like salvation.

The alt-right, in all of its manifestations, is not growing in number and confidence because they made a pact with the devil. There is nothing supernatural at work here. It’s not a coherent intellectual movement, but simply a refuge from the endless assault on ordinary people, who see their traditions, their customs, their ancestors and their progeny being ground up in the meat grinder of technocratic managerialism. The alt-right is not offering anything but shelter from the storm – for now.

When people who have been loyal to conservative causes and conservative politicians their whole life find themselves being called racists and bigots by those people they supported, they start to feel like they have been conned. When ruling class organs publicly argue that vast parts of the culture must be destroyed, that traditional America must be wiped out, people hear a declaration of war. The response is not going to be “yes sir, may I have another.” The response, to quote the late Andrew Breitbart, is going to be “Fuck you. War!”

Hey, I’m okay with that. It was always going to end up like this once enough of us realized that, as with Islam, the people using the rhetoric of war against the Left had no intention of actually fighting them. Their definition of victory has apparently always been “more Republican snouts in the trough” rather than “stopping the Left’s destruction of America That Was, and reversing it.” It’s a recipe for ultimate defeat just as surely as their “bring democracy and freedom to people who are violently and unalterably opposed to both” was.

Share

5 thoughts on “Buckley Conservatives vs Alt-Right

  1. The only difference between the Democrats and the Rove Republicans is whose cronies get to slop at the government trough when THEY are in charge. And in the case of the financial industry, those cronies are identical for BOTH parties.

  2. I am old enough that I was around for the tag end of the Buckley “purges”. I personally consider those who say “The problem with Hitler is, he didn’t get ’em all!’ or “Kill all them niggers, that’ll solve the problem!” (Statements I have heard, not imagined.) to be part of the enemy, not an alternative.

    That said, I think the article and your comments hit the key points. The ultimate achievement of, if you wish to call it that, Buckley conservatism was the defeat of the USSR. That was an historical achievement, but it also removed much of the rationale for the coalition that achieved it. It also coincided with the passing of most of the major figures that formed/lead that coalition. The Islamist threat isn’t the same as the one posed by the Soviets and what defeated the Soviets isn’t going to defeat the Jihad. I tend to think that if the original thinkers, in both senses of the phrase, were still around they might well have seen this and adjusted to it. The follow on position holders haven’t been up to it.

  3. As much as I deplore the way the Birchers got contaminated by white supremacy and anti-semitism, the fact remains that their primary dogma, that the US government was infested with Communists, both Soviet-backed and volunteer, has been proven correct, and even understated, by subsequent events.
    These days, I gotta say, I see Buckley as one of the many reasons we are so totally screwed.
    They may have defeated the Soviets, but they left the home front undefended.

  4. That was by intent, sock_rat_eez. Buckley was a Rove Republican before there was a Rove.

Comments are closed.

Categories

Archives

"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." – Claire Wolfe, 101 Things to Do 'Til the Revolution



Click HERE for great deals on ammo! Using this link helps support CF by getting me credits for ammo too.

Image swiped from The Last Refuge

2016 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

RSS FEED

RSS - entries - Entries
RSS - entries - Comments

E-MAIL


mike at this URL dot com

All e-mails assumed to be legitimate fodder for publication, scorn, ridicule, or other public mockery unless otherwise specified

Boycott the New York Times -- Read the Real News at Larwyn's Linx

All original content © Mike Hendrix