You guys know you can always count on me to say it straight and pull no punches, I’ll just say that much for myself.
Useful idiots update! Michael Moynihan asks what would have to be just about the easiest question in the world:
It’s a thought experiment I often present to the Western Chavista, one that usually ends up demonstrating that sympathizers of the regime, both in this country and in Europe, have something of a colonialist attitude towards Venezuela. Because one wonders the reaction of these faux progressives if Prime Minister David Cameron, President Barack Obama, Chancellor Angela Merkel–pick your the imperialist lackey!–arrested an opposition leader who had organized peaceful street protests? Or if the CIA shut off the internet in politically restive cities like Berkeley and Brooklyn; blocked Twitter traffic it found politically suspect; and took over PBS, forcing it to broadcast only pro-administration agitprop, never allowing the opposition party to traduce the government across public airwaves? Or if the president forced the removal of BBC America from all cable providers for being too anti-American?
Perhaps reactions would be muted if motorcycle gangs loyal to President George W. Bush circled anti-Iraq War protests physically attacking–and occasionally murdering–demonstrators. How about if a judge ruled against President Obama’s domestic spying apparatus and, in return, the White House ordered that judge thrown in prison? How long would an American president be allowed to run up massive inflation, despite massive oil revenues coming into government coffers? How long would it be considered reasonable–and not the president’s responsibility–to preside over 23,000 murders in a country of just under 30 million people, a rate that would horrify the average resident of Baghdad? How long could supermarket shelves remain bare of basic staples like bread and milk before The Nation or The Guardian would gleefully decide that America was a failed, kleptocratic state? Or if Bush or Obama’s economic policies meant that toilet paper could no longer be found on the open market?
So I ask a rather straight-forward question to those who pretend to care about the Venezuelan people (much like those who miraculously lost interest in the Vietnamese people after 1975 or the Nicaraguan people after 1990), those who care so deeply for the poor and destitute in Latin America: Why the double standard?
A: because they’re Leftists, and without hypocrisy, double standards, delusion, and dishonesty, their ideology would of necessity cease to exist, and they themselves would shrivel up and blow away. Right after their heads exploded, natch. As for the answers to his questions in the second paragraph, we’ll be finding out soon enough, unfortunately.
Via Ace, who says:
The chilling thing that separates, in my mind, the leftist from the liberal is the former’s “By any means necessary” ethic. They are willing to defend — and perpetrate themselves — true evil because, they assert, their mission is so intrinsically good that its accomplishment will redeem all sins (including the sin of murder).
It’s a scary mentality. Anyone who has convinced himself that a little bit of murder in the service of preferred politics is excusable should proudly accept membership in the club which he has joined. And that club includes Stalin, Mao, Osama bin Ladin, and, yes, Hitler.
It is indeed scary, to say the least. Considering how many millions their evil ideology has already put in the ground, they’re truly scary bastards, damn them all to Hell. Hence the importance of calling them what they actually are, not allowing them to hide behind euphemisms or a phony “civility,” and not flinching from the truth about them. Them, and their damnably foolish celebrity enablers right along with them.