We are all counterrevolutionaries now

December 31st, 2012

Stupid paranoid gun nuts, thinking all this gun-control hysteria is merely a smokescreen for confiscation and, eventually, suppressing dissidents and incorrect-thinkers and all that tyrannical-tommyrot.

The very first thing we need is national registry. We need to know where the guns are, and who has them. Canada has a national firearms registry. We need to copy their model. We need a law demanding all firearms be registered to a national database. We need to know who has them and where they are. We need to make this as easy as possible for gun owners. The federal government provides the money and technical expertise, and the State police carry it out. Like a funded mandate..

Now we get down to it. The registration period has passed. Now we have criminals without registered guns running around. Probably kooky types that “lost” them on a boat or something.

…I’m not so concerned with the guy who bought that bolt action Mauser a decade ago and doesn’t have anything registered to his name. It’s a pretty good possibility that he sold it, gave it away, or got rid of it somehow. And even if he didn’t, that guy is not who I’m concerned with. I’m concerned that other guy who bought a half dozen assault weapons, registered two hunting rifles, and belongs to the NRA/GOA. He’s the guy who warrants a raid.

“Now we get down to it” indeed. All this despotic daydreaming does make one thing perfectly clear, to swipe one of His Majesty’s favorite muttonheaded verbal tics: gun control is not about crime, or about preventing mass murders, or about making America a safer, less violent, more conciliatory and civilized nation. Like absolutely every other freedom-destroying, Constitution-defying measure “liberals” promote, it is about one thing, and one thing only: control.

You will become one with the big-government Borg. If you resist, well, they haff vays of dealing with you. These people are fascists, plain and simple. Bob Owens paints up a possible scenario which gets more likely with every passing power grab:

Tens of millions of Americans will refuse to comply with an order that is clearly a violation of the explicit intent of the Second Amendment. Among the most ardent opposing these measures will be military veterans, active duty servicemen, and local law enforcement officers. Many of these individuals will refuse to carry out what they view as Constitutionally illegal orders. Perhaps 40-50 million citizens will view such a law as treason. Perhaps ten percent of those, 4-5 million, would support a rebellion in some way, and maybe 40,000-100,000 Americans will form small independently-functioning active resistance cells, or become lone-wolves.

They will be leaderless, stateless, difficult to track, and considering the number of military veterans that would likely be among their number, extremely skilled at sabotage, assassination, and ambush.

After a number of carefully-planned, highly-publicized, and successful raids by the government, one or more will invariably end “badly.” Whether innocents are gunned down, a city block is burned to ash, or especially fierce resistance leads to a disastrously failed raid doesn’t particularly matter. What matters is that when (the) illusion of the government’s invincibility and infallibility is broken, the hunters will become the hunted.

Unnamed citizens and federal agents will be the first to die, and they will die by the dozens and maybe hundreds, but famous politicians will soon join them in a spate of revenge killings, many of which will go unsolved.

While the Secret Service will be able to protect the President in the White House, he will not dare leave his gilded cage except in carefully controlled circumstances. Even then he will be forced to move like a criminal. He will never be seen outdoors in public again. Not in this country.

I can live with that, actually. In fact, out of all the dreadful eventualities in Bob’s scenario, the thought of a steercotted Ogabe skulking and cowering in the White House while he plots ever-more-dictatorial actions that keep blowing up in his face over and over, as his absolute power slowly erodes and the Tinkertoy nation he constructed out of the ashes of America That Was blows away with the breeze, almost makes up for the rest of them. Can’t say I’m quite as sanguine as Bob is about this part, though:

Here, the President will doubtlessly order the activation of National Guard units and the regular military to impose martial law, setting the largest and most powerful military in the world against its own people. Unfortunately, the tighter the President clinches his tyrannical fist, the more rebels he makes.

Military commands and federal agencies will be whittled down as servicemen and agents will desert or defect. Some may leave as individuals, others may join the Rebellion in squad and larger-sized units with all their weapons, tactics, skills, and insider intelligence. The regime will be unable to trust its own people, and because they cannot trust them, they will lose more in a vicious cycle of collapse.

It’d be nice to think that LE and military types would refuse to follow the orders of the tyrant and defy the chain of command in numbers enough to have any kind of impact, but I dunno. The famous picture of the hapless Muhammad movie-maker surrounded by a sea of klueless koppers perfectly willing, if not eager, to violate his 1A rights and haul him off to the gulag at the politically-motivated whim of Dear Leader would seem to contradict that hope; local LE has grown way too accustomed to their power and comfortable with the militarization of their departments, and they enjoy the urban-assault toys the Federal G has loaded them up with too much to give them up in support of a principle they’ve never been all that attached to or even cognizant of anyway. As for federal agents, I can’t see any but the tiniest handful of them willingly relinquishing their cherished power over us.

ATF agents stepping up for freedom and the Constitution in defiance of their Imperial bossheads? DHS, the FBI, IRS? Think EPA and the Department of Ed SWAT teams are going to abandon their newfound lordship and dry up and blow away, after the Feds have stockpiled literally tons of ammo and equipment for just such an eventuality as this? Umm, sadly, no. My guess is that there would be fairly substantial numbers of lower-level military personnel who would have a problem with executing the orders of the tyrant; higher-ranking officers and the cops, not so much. And they’re–the cops, that is–the ones we’ll be confronting in the crucial, make-or-break early stages of insurrection.

In any event, the gutless liberal-fascist pussies will be relying on others to do their dirty work for them as usual, and I doubt they’ll lack for willing hands in this God-forsaken country. Which doesn’t make standing up for the right any less imperative.

The main thing to realize for now is that this is how the people running “your” government perceive you. Don’t make me repeat the ironclad argument that neo-Nazi pigsties like Daily Kos, DU, Media Mutters, TP Memo, PuffHo, and others have great influence with not only the rest of the liberal media, but our misbegotten government itself. Don’t make me post another list of the many times Democrat Socialist politicians at every level have referred to Constitution-respecting citizens legally and non-violently petitioning the federal tyranny for redress of grievances as dangerous, violence-prone criminals and even terrorists. Don’t make me reiterate that Tea Partiers and others have been placed on more than one Imperial watchlist. Just accept it, and steel yourselves. Because they’re coming, sure enough.

A little reminder from an American who is surely spinning in his grave like a 78 rpm record by now at how the country he helped found and establish has been debased and disgraced: “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.” The line usually appended to this quote, albeit incorrectly, is nonetheless perfectly true too: “The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.” It’s fake, but it’s accurate as hell, now more than ever.

It has been said elsewhere that the NRA, for all the liberal-fascist shrieking about them, isn’t trying to take anything away from anybody. The same cannot be said of the liberal-fascists. We know what they are; we know what they hope to do. Molon labe, motherfuckers.

(Jawalink via Maet)

Comments appear entirely at the whim of the guy who pays the bills for this site, and may be deleted, edited, ridiculed, or otherwise pissed over as he in his capricious fancy sees fit. Thank you.
  1. December 31st, 2012 at 05:25 | #1
    Salami tactics have worked very well for the Left; they have no reason to think they won't continue to work. The Kossacks, etc., appear to be more aware of this than many in the Right. But this slice of our rights -- national firearms registration -- is the point of no return. Confiscation always comes next, and once the "authorities" know who's armed, mass violence is inevitable.

    For my part, bring it on. If they want a fight, let's give 'em a real one: one they can't win by stealing a few hundred thousand votes. Yes, blood will flow. Yes, there will be a great deal of disorder and destruction. But this is the crux, the point on which freedom ultimately depends: the retention of the means of resistance to tyrants. If we go gently into that good night, it's all over, possibly for centuries to come.

  2. Jaynie59
    December 31st, 2012 at 07:54 | #2
    It's nice to read one conservative blogger who doesn't have his head up his ass when it comes to cops. The blind support and defense of LE no matter what fascist crap it pulls is pretty disgusting. But heaven forbid you make an honest statement about the average cop and you're attacked as a left wing loon. Conservative bloggers love stories about kids and their lemonade stands being shut down, or 11 year old girls being fined for saving a woodpecker, but they never seem to make the connection to WHO actually carries out orders like that. The notion that masses of soldiers and LE officers will refuse to follow orders when it comes to imposing any regulation, much less law, is laughable. I mean, seriously, just think back to junior high school. Give an average "good" kid a vest, make him or her a hall monitor or crossing guard and watch the little Hitler come out.
  3. BillyB
    December 31st, 2012 at 11:38 | #3
    Mike and Jaynie59,

    Exactly right. I've seen comments elsewhere with people talking about defending themselves against ATF or other federal agents.

    That's not (at least, initially) who will be coming for your guns. It will be the county sherriff or the local cop you went to highschool with.

    Many LEOs will say they would never do such a thing. However, in the cold light of day when they're given a choice between following an unlawful order or ... quitting and losing their job, their career, their income, their livelihood, their pension, their retirement, their economic security for themselves and their family, and possibly losing their homes & families altogether; ... well, then many will come up with all sorts of justifications and rationalizations about how what they're doing isn't what they're doing. Or, that it's just a little thing; or, it's just temporary; or, that the "law abiding" aren't really being denied their rights; or, whatever.

    And that's aside from the ones that think this is all long overdue, and those who'll follow any order provided they get to keep putting on their jackboots in the morning,one foot at a time, and kicking in doors ... and heads.

    All of which will probably be beside the point, as those who refuse unlawful gun-grabbing orders will get canned and quickly be replaced with the jackbooted kind.

    Are "law & order" conservatives really willing to become "cop-killers" to defend their rights. Because that's what it might take.

  4. BillyB
    December 31st, 2012 at 11:58 | #4
    I'm not sure what the percentages are for cops of the one kind, and cops of the other kind; but I don't think that the good kind are in such great proportion that it's reasonable to assume that police, generally, will be "on our side" against the national government.

    I think the percentage of those who won't obey unlawful orders is higher among the military. But, our men in uniform are being, and will continue to be, sent various places to die. Not to fight & die; not to defend America & die; but just ... to die. Why else are we still in Afghanistan? And with the R.O.E.'s that they're given? I mean, other than to also keep them out of elections here at home.

    The military is overseas, handcuffed, and dying in unwarranted numbers. And that's just how Obammy likes it.

    Besides, you don't use an apache helicopter or Abrams tank to confiscate someone's deer rifle. And, if you did need them, the police are getting more & more equipment more suited to the military than to civilian law enforcement. (remember, a little while back, the "tank" sent to take a woman's child from her on CPS say-so?)

    As for "Federal" law enforcement? ..... ppfffffttt! They're already committed to this. And so am I (you know, in the opposite direction).

  5. HempRopeAndStreetlight
    December 31st, 2012 at 15:52 | #5
    I strongly recommend people start noting where your local LEO's live, where their family works, and where their children go to school.

    Just in case.

    They need to absolutely understand in no uncertain terms, that, 2:30 am "no-knock" raids are not a sport restricted to one side in this nasty little game.

  6. SDN
    January 1st, 2013 at 08:19 | #6

    Are "law & order" conservatives really willing to become "cop-killers" to defend their rights. Because that's what it might take.

    Don't know about anyone else, but being a "law and order" conservative presupposes there's a "law" to follow. At that point, there won't be.

  7. Celebrate Homogeneity
    January 1st, 2013 at 09:41 | #7

    The military is overseas, handcuffed, and dying in unwarranted numbers. And that's just how Obammy likes it.

    It has been this way since Truman and before. It is not something exclusive to the Kenyan Muslim.

    As for the cops? I went to school with kids whose parents survived Germany's little experiment with the New World Order. More than one of those parents told me it will be the police to come for you first. "Last week, they smiled and greeted you on the street. Last week, they ate in your restaurant. Last week, they brought in their radio sets to your shop to have them mended. This week? This week they are screaming "raus! raus!" and pushing you into the trucks at the point of a bayonet. And yes, children, it can, and WILL happen here, if they are given the slightest chance!"

    Oath-Keepers will be right in there with them.

  8. Americana banana
    January 1st, 2013 at 13:00 | #8
    Speaking of Germany, everyone should read this story: http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/2012/12/america-dont-let-freedom-slip-away-by.html?m=1
Comments are closed.
Home > Counterrevolution, Death to Liberty!, Life In The O!gulag, Our Enemies > We are all counterrevolutionaries now
British Virgin Islands - Guitar Lessons - Costa Rica - Renegade Motorhome