Bill expands on a point I also made myself the other day:
And before anybody starts blubbering that I’m betraying the Republican Party, keep in mind that I’m not a Republican. I’m a registered Libertarian. I’m one of those independents the GOP Ruling Class keeps on raving that they have to nominate Mitt in order to attract. Except I’m the sort of independent who isn’t attracted by the likes of Mitt Romney, I’m repulsed.
As I’ve been telling you for years, if you GOP morons want my vote, nominate somebody I want to vote for.
They don’t care about your vote, Bill, or mine; they just assume they own those, thinking we have no place else to go. It’s the liberal “independents” they’re interested in, see. And they’re willing to toss any principle at all aside to woo ‘em and win ‘em. It’s what soulless whores do.
And while we’re at it, this is too priceless to let sit unremarked-upon:
I’m sorry but, on purely tactical grounds, what a bonehead move by the Romney campaign. Negative attacks, especially in a primary, have to be run on a careful cost-benefit analysis, and what exactly is the upside here? That at least Tom Brokaw isn’t Dan Rather?
Well, why not? The entire rationale for the Mittbots is that Romney isn’t Obama–another distinction without a meaningful difference. As long as you’re splitting hairs–and doubling down on a Lefty lie–well, what the heck, anything goes in the pursuit of power, right, Republicrats?
- Entries
2 comments
K T Cat says:
1/29/2012 at 7:44 PM (UTC -5)
Douglas says:
1/29/2012 at 8:31 PM (UTC -5)